Stories of Rainbow and Lucky: Up the River

This is the fifth and final book in the Stories of Rainbow and Lucky series. I’ve already covering the rest of the books this series, and I have to do all five books in a row because the series is set up like a mini-series. That is, none of the books in the series can stand alone; they are all installments of one, longer story. They only make sense together.

It’s an unusual series from the mid-19th century, written on the eve of the American Civil War, by a white author with a young black hero. Rainbow is a teenage black boy who, in the previous installments of the story, is hired by a young carpenter, Handie, who is just a few years older than he is, to help him with a job in another town, working on renovating a farm house that Handie has inherited. The rest of the series follows the two young men, particularly Rainbow, through their adventures leaving their small town for the first time, learning life lessons, getting new jobs, and even dealing with difficult topics like racism. Lucky is a horse who used to belong to a neighbor of Handie’s new farm. Rainbow befriended him, and in the previous book in the series, he managed to buy Lucky on credit. Because he now owns a horse, he is able to take a new job, delivering mail. This final story in the series follows Rainbow as he begins his new job.

The story is unusual for this time period because it was uncommon for black people to be the heroes of books and for topics like racism to be discussed directly. I wouldn’t say that racism is the main focus of the series. It’s mainly a slice of life and coming of age story for Rainbow as he and Handie both set out in life and begin building careers for themselves, and it’s meant to be educational for young readers. However, racism and racist comments are sprinkled throughout the story, with the author calling attention to the fact that these are not good ways to behave or polite ways of speaking, for the benefit of its original audience of 19th century children. It’s also important to point out that our black hero is not a slave, he is not enslaved at any point in the series, and the series has a happy ending for him. People don’t always treat him right, but he does have friends and allies, and he manages to deal with the adversity he faces and builds a future for himself. 

This particular installment in the series focuses on Rainbow’s new job. It has its hardships and adventures, but it sets up a bright future for Rainbow. Keep in mind along the way that there are a lot of pun names in this series and that people’s names are often clues to their characters.

This book is easily available to read online in your browser through NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN CHILDREN & WHAT THEY READ, I’m going to do a detailed summary below. If you’d rather read it yourself before you read my review, you can go ahead, but some people might want to know what it’s like in more detail.

This story picks up where the previous book in the series left off, with Rainbow back in his home town with his horse, Lucky. He has just accepted the job of delivering mail. The first characters we see are Thomas and Jerry, two teenage boys working in the stable that belongs to the local tavern. Jerry is younger than Thomas and has only just started working there. He is disgruntled because Thomas won’t let him handle some tasks without supervising him closely. Thomas says that he needs to see how Jerry works before he will trust him to work unsupervised. Jerry thinks that Thomas is implying that he’s incapable of doing the work, which is insulting. Thomas says that his own job depends on his ability to make sure that everything is done correctly in the stables, and as a new employee, Jerry is his responsibility, so Thomas needs to make sure that he knows what he’s doing and does a good job.

Rainbow is boarding Lucky at the stable, and the boys talk about the horse and about Rainbow’s new job. Thomas is a little envious of Rainbow for getting the job of delivering mail, but he couldn’t apply for it himself because he doesn’t have a horse of his own, like Rainbow does. Jerry asks how Rainbow was able to afford a horse, and Thomas explains that he bought it on credit. Making a major purchase on credit involves finding someone who is willing to supply the loan, and Thomas is also a little envious that Rainbow managed to do that because he can’t think of anyone who would trust him enough to loan him that amount of money. Jerry says that he’s surprised that a black boy got the job because the black boys he’s known are so “saucy” (meaning flippant or impudent). However, Thomas says that Rainbow isn’t like that and that he’s smart and a good worker. In spite of the fact that Thomas wishes he was in Rainbow’s position, he admits that Rainbow got to this position because he’s a good worker, and employers trust him because he has demonstrated that he is scrupulous in fulfilling his duties to them. That’s how Rainbow finds people willing to hire him and loan him money.

Rainbow comes to the stable to give Lucky a brushing and take him out for a run. He tells Lucky that he’s been able to have fun up to this point, but soon, they will have to seriously begin their work of carrying the mail. They will have to follow a 24-mile route up the river, traveling in all kinds of weather with a heavy mail sack, and there will be a fine to pay if they don’t stick to the route and arrive on time. However, the work will pay off, and Rainbow says that he will see to it that Lucky has a nice, warm stable and good food. Lucky, being a horse, is unconcerned and is mainly interested in neighing at another horse he sees nearby.

When Rainbow and Lucky return to the stable, Jerry tells Rainbow that Trigget is waiting in the tavern to talk to him. Rainbow goes to see Trigget, and Trigget says that he is there to draw up the contract for Rainbow’s new job. They discuss the job requirements and the pay, and Trigget offers Rainbow advice about how fast his horse can travel and how he can make his mail run on time. Because Lucky is still a young horse, Trigget cautions Rainbow not to run him too hard and risk injury. Traveling the full length of his route at a good pace will take about 8 or 9 hours, so Rainbow should plan accordingly. During periods when the weather is bad and traveling will be slower, Rainbow will have to leave earlier in the morning to make sure that he finishes the route at the proper time.

Trigget also tells him that, even though he’s sure that Rainbow will do his best to be on time with his deliveries, there will be times when he will be late despite his best efforts. Sometimes, the weather will be bad, and there’s always the risk of accidents. Because there are government fines for being late with the mail, Rainbow’s pay includes the option to accept extra money that he can use to pay up to four fines per year, if Rainbow chooses to pay his fines himself rather than having the company pay on his behalf. It’s a bit of a gamble to accept this option because, if Rainbow is late more than four times during the year, he will have to cover the additional late fines himself and will lose money. However, if Rainbow is late less than three times during the year, he can keep whatever is left over from that extra money. Rainbow decides to accept this option because he is confident that he won’t be late very often. With the terms settled, Rainbow signs his contract with Trigget and begins his job.

Rainbow and Lucky set off on their route on the morning of November 1. The book explains that the post office in their town is in a small building next to the tavern, and Rainbow enters from the tavern, using a special key kept on a hook. The postmaster prepared mail bag the night before, so it is ready to go. Rainbow just needs to pick it up.

Rainbow and Lucky ride about 5 miles before they reach the first post office on their route. The postmaster there takes the mail bag from Rainbow, removes the mail meant for his office, and returns the bag to Rainbow. Everything goes according to routine at the first stop, and Rainbow and Lucky continue on their way.

Rainbow begins to consider his new schedule as they travel. They will be traveling for most of the week with a stop at post office No. 5 for a couple of days. The stop at No. 5 would be a good time for Lucky to rest, but Rainbow wonders what he’s going to do there for a couple of days himself. He considers whether he could find any side jobs to do there, like carpenter work or hauling wood.

As they continue on their way, Rainbow talks to Lucky about the countryside, the river, and the bridges, noting how high the water under them can get. About every four or five miles, they stop at another post office. As they keep going up river, the post offices become more primitive. One of them is just in a log cabin with a sign written in chalk to designate it as the post office.

At a place called Mix’s Corner, a man named Mix has a farm and a saw mill. His house also serves as the post office and tavern for the few travelers who come that way. Mrs. Mix handles the mail and gives Rainbow some food while her young son, Ephraim, puts Lucky in the barn, where Rainbow can give him some oats. Rainbow offers to make a whistle for Ephraim, but then, he remembers that it’s better to make whistles in the spring, when the barn is easier to separate from a willow or poplar stem. (There is a detailed explanation here about how that works because the new layer of wood formed in the spring, the alburnum, is softer then. After it has matured, it becomes harder, and it’s more difficult to remove. The author/narrator says that Rainbow doesn’t fully understand the scientific principles behind this process, but he knows from hands-on experience that these wooden stems are easier to work with in the spring. “So much for the philosophy of whistle-making.”) Ephraim is disappointed, so Rainbow offers to make him a windmill toy instead and to bring him a whistle from the store the next time he passes. Stores sell whistles for a penny each, so it wouldn’t be too expensive for Rainbow to buy one for the boy. Ephraim accepts the offer, so Rainbow makes him a windmill out of a wooden shingle (we called this toy a pinwheel when I was a kid, and we made them out of paper), and Ephraim runs around in the yard outside with it to make it spin.

As Rainbow continues on his way, he makes it a point to get to know the people along his route and to make friends with them. At the next house he passes, a woman named Mrs. Captain Myers greets him. The narrator says that she even gives him a “courtesy” (what we would call a curtsy). Normally, she probably wouldn’t make such a formal, deferential gesture for an ordinary black boy, but she knows that he’s the new mail-carrier, and this is an important position in this area as mail is the main form of communication. She values the position Rainbow holds, so he gets special consideration.

She asks Rainbow if he is carrying any letters for her, but he says that he doesn’t know. There is a lock on the mail bag he carries, and he can’t open it because only the postmasters at the post offices along his route have copies of the key. This is how they keep the mail secure. Since he can’t open the bag himself, there’s no way that Rainbow can check for letters for specific people. Mrs. Captain Myers lives a couple of miles from the nearest post office, and she says that it’s often difficult for her to get there to pick up her letters. Rainbow says that, if she likes, he can pick up her mail for her and bring it to her on his return trip, and she say that would be very helpful.

As he rides on, Rainbow confides to Lucky that his desire to make friends and help people he meets along the way isn’t entirely out of kindness for its own sake but also cunning. Rainbow knows that this route will become more difficult to travel during the winter, and there will probably be some times when he will need help from people who live in the area. If he has made friends with them and done them a few good deeds, they will probably be more likely to help him later, when he needs a good deed himself. The narrator/author weighs in at this point with some thoughts about how Rainbow needn’t think this form of “cunning” isn’t also kindness:

Rainbow was very much mistaken in supposing that his disposition to be obliging to the people who lived along the road was to be attributed to cunning and not to kindness. If we really entertain feelings of good-will o those around us, and desire to promote their happiness by every means in our power, and take pleasure in doing it, then we are truly and sincerely kind. The fact that we are aware that, by so doing, we make other people ready to show kindness to us in return, and that we are even influenced in what we do by a desire to secure such requitals, is nothing in any sense derogatory. “Cast thy bread upon the waters: thou shalt find it after many days,” is an injunction of the Scriptures, and it implies that it is right for us to be influenced in our efforts to do good by the hope and expectation of receiving at some day or other a beneficial return.

(I can see the point, that a kind act isn’t diminished by the other person’s gratitude or willingness to return the favor. The author might have also considered that there are also less kind ways for people to try to get people’s cooperation than building up goodwill in advance. Some people might simply expect deferential treatment as their due without showing care or consideration to the other people involved, or worse, they might use the threat of bad behavior to make other people do things for them. Rainbow is taking a better path by showing others that he does care about them and is willing to help them when he can, even if they haven’t done anything for him yet.)

The final stop on Rainbow’s route is post office No. 5, which is in Squire Holden’s house. (The book sometimes calls Mr. Holden by the title “squire,” which can have several meanings. Besides the British gentry title, it can refer to the primary land owner in a village, which may be the meaning here, or to someone who holds a legal position, like the lawyer in the first book in the series, who was also called “Squire.” The legal title is still in use sometimes as a courtesy title for lawyers in the form of “esquire“, after a lawyer’s name, frequently abbreviated as Esq.) The village is very small, with only a blacksmith shop, a mill, and a general store. Squire Holden’s house is only one story with an addition built on that doesn’t look completely finished. Since Rainbow has had some carpentry training from Handie (in the earlier books in the series), he thinks that he might be able to get some work helping the Holden family finish it. Squire Holden isn’t at home when Rainbow arrives, but his wife greets him and tells him where to put the mail bag.

According to the arrangement of his route, Rainbow will be staying with the Holdens for a couple of days before beginning the journey back. Trigget discussed with the Holdens before Rainbow began his job, telling them that the new mail carrier would be a black boy. As mentioned in the first book in the series, some people in this time and area might object to having a black person stay with them, so Trigget wanted to make sure that Rainbow would be welcome with them and would have a place to stay. The Holdens have no objection to hosting Rainbow, with Mrs. Holden saying, “that she never cared at all what color a cow was so long as she gave plenty of good milk.” (Meaning that she isn’t concerned about Rainbow’s race as much as his behavior, and Trigget has given him a good character reference, so it’s all fine with her.) The narrator says that Trigget thought that would probably be the case with the Holdens, but he thought that they would appreciate him discussing the situation with them first anyway, since Rainbow would be staying in their home as a guest. The Holdens’ small daughter, Toolie, is very shy of Rainbow when he first arrives, but she warms up to him gradually during his stay. Rainbow helps to win her over by making a little doll for her.

Mr. Holden is out in the woods, cutting down some trees. Rainbow offers to go and help him, if there is an extra axe, but Mrs. Holden says that the only other axe they have is an old, dull one. Rainbow goes to the village store to see if he can buy an axe, but the store is closed. The nearby blacksmith tells him that the store doesn’t sell axes anyway. All they have is axe handles. Rainbow watches the blacksmith making horse-shoe nails for a while, and the narrator describes the process. The blacksmith comments about the horse Rainbow rode there and asks who owns it. Rainbow says that’s a difficult question to answer because he has bought the horse but hasn’t yet paid for him. Since Rainbow doesn’t explain further about buying the horse by obtaining a loan for the purchase and that it’s the loan that he hasn’t repaid, the blacksmith is surprised and doesn’t really believe him.

Rainbow spots an old axe in the blacksmith shop and studies it. He knows more about evaluating the condition of tools than the blacksmith thinks because of his time working with Handie. Rainbow realizes that the axe is old and has been worn down and resharpened many time before. To put it in good repair again, the axe head would have to be removed from the hand and reshaped through a process they call “setting” (which the author describes as one of his detailed explanations of 19th century life). Rainbow negotiates with the blacksmith to purchase the axe and have it set. (The blacksmith quotes him the price of a “shilling.” It surprised me that he called it a shilling because that’s usually a British monetary description, and this is the mid-19th century, well after the Revolutionary War. I didn’t realize that expression was used in the United States that late. The amount of money in the “shilling” the blacksmith expects is also different from the British shilling. The British shilling would be worth 12 pence or pennies or 1/20 of a pound, but the book explains that the blacksmith wants 26 cents.) The blacksmith asks when Rainbow can pay for it because he said that he didn’t pay for the horse he bought, and the blacksmith doesn’t think he really has any money. To his surprise, Rainbow produces the money and pays right away, which makes the blacksmith hold him in higher regard. The blacksmith says that he can have the axe ready for him that evening.

When Rainbow returns to the Holdens’ house, he uses their old axe to split some wood in the yard. When Mr. Holden returns home for supper, he says that Rainbow can help him to clear a piece of land. He offers Rainbow two shillings a day for his help, which Rainbow considers a good wage. Rainbow tells him about the axe he is buying from the blacksmith, which he can use for clearing some bushes while Mr. Holden cuts down trees. However, Rainbow says that he would also like to explore the neighborhood the next day because he has never been in this area before.

After supper, Rainbow returns to the blacksmith, whose name is Mr. Whackhammer. He helps by operating the bellows while the blacksmith works on the axe. Mr. Whackhammer comments that Rainbow seems to have some understanding of tools, and Rainbow explains a little about his work with Handie over the summer. The blacksmith thinks that he’s bright to have picked up some knowledge of tools in such a short time. After the blacksmith finishes setting the head, Rainbow buys a new handle for it and fits the head to the handle. (The author also describes the process for that.)

Rainbow spends the rest of evening talking and telling stories with the Holdens by the fire. When it’s time to go to bed, Mr. and Mrs. Holden talk to each other a little about Rainbow. Mr. Holden says that Rainbow seems like a smart boy, and Mrs. Holden says that he is also pleasant company, noting that, “I’m more and more confirmed in my opinion, that it is of no consequence what the color of a cow is, provided she is not cross, and gives plenty of good milk.”

The next morning, Rainbow goes out to the woods with Mr. Holden and helps him clear the underbrush on the land he is trying to clear. When he does a good job with that, Mr. Holden says that he can try his hand at cutting down trees, which is trickier. A person cutting down a tree needs to cut it in a particular way so that it will fall in the direction he wants it to fall. The narrator explains how this works, and Rainbow follows Mr. Holden’s example. They make good progress before they go home for dinner. (“Dinner” is frequently what they call lunch in the countryside, and that is the case here. They go home for lunch.)

After dinner, Rainbow says that he would like to take a walk and explore the area that afternoon. The Holdens tell him a little about the people who live nearby, including a man named Mr. Dyker, who is building a house. Rainbow says that he might go see him and offer his help. This, unfortunately, leads us to the second use of the n-word in this series. As Rainbow approaches the house, he hears Mr. Dyker say to the man who is with him, “Who is this (n-word) coming, Dan?” When Rainbow hears that, he almost turns around and leaves, wishing that he hadn’t bothered to come. What stops him is that Dan replies, “Don’t call him a (n-word), Joe, till you find out whether he deserves it.” Rainbow decides that he might take a chance on these men since at least one of the two seems willing to give him a chance. (Personally, I might not be so charitable. Rainbow considers Dan a “fair man” for his comment about reserving judgement to see “whether he deserves it”, but to my way of thinking, calling that comment “fair” would imply that there might be people who do deserve that kind of slur, and I’m not convinced. Granted, it’s not as bad as immediately calling a total stranger something bad for no reason, but it’s still not great.) Rainbow still feels indignant about the insult, but he decides to follow his mother’s advice about “overcoming evil with good.”

Rainbow explains that he heard they would be raising a house frame this afternoon, so he came to see if he could help. Mr. Dyker says that perhaps he can. Mr. Dyker doesn’t think too much of Rainbow’s abilities at first, and he also hesitates to let him do too much because he thinks Rainbow might expect payment. He asks Rainbow what kind of wages he expects, but Rainbow says that he doesn’t need any money. He’s just looking for things to do because he is the new mail carrier and will be staying here for a short time before following the route back down the river. Hearing that Rainbow is the new mail carrier catches Mr. Dyker’s attention. Rainbow explains what he can do to help them, and Mr. Dyker and Dan realize that Rainbow has some carpentry experience. Dan suggests that they let Rainbow show them what he can do. When they see that Rainbow knows what he’s doing, they’re happy to let him work with them. As they work, they chat pleasantly with each other, and they begin feeling better about each other.

When Mrs. Dyker begins to lay out supper, Rainbow gets ready to leave, thinking that they might not way to eat with a black person, considering the way Mr. Dyker talked before, but they insist that they would like him to stay and have supper with them, so he does. While they’re getting the supper ready, Rainbow even picks some flowers for Mrs. Dyker, as “the lady of the new house.” The author/narrator says that this gesture pleases Mrs. Dyker, even coming from a black boy (which seems a little back-handed to me). The author/narrator also says that Mr. Dyker adds a prayer of blessing for Rainbow to their prayer before the meal. He says, “Mr. Dyker was perfectly honest and sincere in these invocations, for he was really a good man, although he had been so heartless, or rather so thoughtless, as to call Rainbow at first by an opprobrious name.”

Mr. Dyker compliments Rainbow on his carpentry skills, and Rainbow thanks him, but he says that he doesn’t plan on becoming a real carpenter. Mr. Dyker asks him why, and Rainbow says that he has trouble with the mathematical skills that professional carpenters need to plan what they build. Handie tried to teach him a little geometry, but he found it difficult to understand. The author/narrator praises Rainbow for this honest and accurate assessment of his own skills and limits. Rainbow knows his tools and can carry out some basic carpentry tasks and assist others, but he knows that he can’t plan out the full construction of a building or more complicated projects by himself. Still, Mr. Dyker thinks enough of Rainbow’s skills that he says anytime he has free time, he will pay him to help further with his building project. Rainbow says that he will be free on Friday, and he can work for Mr. Dyker that day, but he can’t make promises beyond that point. He’s still getting a feel for his new job as mail carrier, and he can’t say what other jobs might come up for him on the side.

On Rainbow’s way back down the river from his first trip, he remembers to pick up Mrs. Myers’s letters for her, as he promised before. He also remember to buy a penny whistle for young Ephraim to take with him when he begins his next route up the river. He knows it’s important to keep his promises while building relationships with the people he meets.

As Rainbow continues making trips up and down the river, he starts to become better friends with little Toolie. In particular, Toolie likes the way he answers the questions she asks. The narrator explains that Rainbow is very good at answering the questions of young children because he knows a little more than they do, but not a lot more. Rainbow is still young himself, in his teenage years, and he is just starting to get out in the world and experience more of life, but he isn’t that much more experienced than a kid yet, which the author says is the ideal mindset for explaining things to kids. Often, adults with a lot of knowledge and experience will try to tell kids too much or make their explanations too detailed when talking to young kids, confusing them. Rainbow is one step ahead of them in his knowledge, and one step further is the most a young kid can take at once.

At this point, the author delivers a reprimand to adults who assume that, just because they cannot give a young child a complete, detailed answer to their questions that the child should not have asked the question in the first place. He says that asking questions and trying to understand the world is part of the natural business of childhood and is important for helping the child to prepare for later life, so a child should never be criticized or shut down for doing that. He says that it is unreasonable for an adult to try to stop children from asking questions or reprimand them for their growing young minds simply because the adult finds it difficult to handle and formulate answers. (I have some thoughts about this, but I’ll save them for my reactions section.)

One day, little Toolie asks Rainbow questions about his appearance, trying to figure out why he looks different from everyone else she knows. (Her questions sound awkward and would be insulting, if they didn’t come from a little child who is just struggling to understand something that she has noticed.) She starts by asking him why his face is black. Rainbow simply says that he’s always been like that. Toolie thinks about it a little and then asks if the black would wash off if he washes his face. Rainbow explains that it won’t because his color is something inside himself that just grows there, and it’s not something on the outside of his skin that would wash off. (Rainbow might not know the word melanin, but this basic description is accurate. The scientific explanation is that all humans have melanin in their bodies, but we have it to different degrees. People with a lot of melanin have darker skin, hair, and eyes, and people with less have lighter features. This is an example of how Rainbow, with little formal education, can’t supply some of the more complex, scientific explanations, but he can deliver simple explanations that are accurate and easy enough for a young child to understand.) Toolie further asks Rainbow about his curly hair, and Rainbow says his hair curls like that naturally, although some people use curling tongs to curl their hair. Toolie understands this because her mother also has curling tongs.

Satisfied with this basic explanation, Toolie tells Rainbow about the schoolhouse up the road. Toolie sometimes goes to school there, when her father has the time to take her there, and she asks Rainbow if he will take her there sometimes. Rainbow says that he could take her on Lucky when he carries the mail, making a pun on male/female: “Then Lucky would have a mail and a female on his back.” Toolie is confused because she doesn’t understand the terms male and female yet. Rainbow asks her what she learns at school, and Toolie says she is learning to count, but she can only count up to nine so far. Rainbow jokes about his own ability to count, saying that he counts, “One couple three several, many more enough, plenty, and ever so many.” Toolie doesn’t believe him that this is the right way to count, and they move on to talking about why the sun is so bright and warm before it’s time for dinner.

Toolie’s parents arrange with Rainbow for him to take her to school one day before he leaves with the mail. Rainbow takes Lucky for a brief run before picking up the mail and Toolie because Lucky is very energetic, and he doesn’t want Lucky to act up and scare little Toolie while she’s riding with him. Toolie is very nervous when she gets up on Lucky, and Rainbow tells her that’s fine and normal:

“Yes,” said Rainbow, “every body’s afraid the first time they ride upon a horse. I expected that you would be afraid. But that’s no matter. It does not hurt any body to be afraid, so don’t you mind it.”

(I like that advice better than “All we have to fear is fear itself.” Learning not to be afraid of your own fear sounds like a more positive move.)

The other children and their teacher are surprised to see Rainbow arrive at the school, carrying Toolie on horseback. He introduces himself and explains that he’s the one who carries the mail. Some of them say that they would love it if Rainbow would bring them letters, and Rainbow laughs before he rides off again.

There is a brief interlude at this point that explains that Toolie is one of the youngest children at the school and describes what the youngest children do. It’s a small, one-room schoolhouse, so the teacher divides her attention between the different levels of students. Mostly, the youngest children just practice reciting their letters for the teacher at various points throughout the day, and the rest of the time, they are allowed to play outside, as long as they stay within sight of the school and come inside when the teacher rings the bell.

As Rainbow continues to travel his route, he meets more people and becomes better acquainted with the terrain and how it changes with the weather and changing season. There is one point when he has to ask a strange for directions for an alternate route because he realizes that the water in a stream he crosses is rising too high and that his usual road may become impassable. Later, he befriends some children he meets while watering his house and makes toy boats for them. He calls the children he meets along his route “my children” because he has a soft spot for young children and likes looking after them and making them little toys.

There are times when the route is harsh due to bad weather, which Rainbow knew would happen before he began the job. He still has to get the mail through as best he can, no matter the weather. There is one time when he has to walk the mail across and then his horse across a flooded crossing. The only time when he misses one of his stops is when he gets lost in a snow storm because the roads are covered in snow, and he fails to reach No. 5. When Rainbow realizes that they’re lost, he and Lucky have to camp out in the woods. Rainbow makes them a couple of huts for shelter, and they are able to find their way in the morning.

Rainbow’s most serious problem comes when Lucky is stolen from Trigget’s stable one night by a couple of thieves. At first, Trigget assumes that Lucky simply got out of the stable himself somehow and is lost, so he loans Rainbow another horse that he can ride to make the mail run. Rainbow is very upset, but he has no choice but to start on his route with the borrowed horse. At every stop on his route, he asks if anyone has seen Lucky, but nobody has.

Meanwhile, the thieves are hiding in a house in the countryside, planning to wait until Rainbow has stopped looking for his horse. Eventually, they plan to take the horse to Boston to sell him. To make Lucky less recognizable, they paint white markings on him. However, Lucky doesn’t like the rough shed where the thieves are keeping him. He gnaws throught he rope securing him. Unable to get out of the shed, he lies down behind some barrels, so when the thieves come to feed him the next day, they don’t see him. When they find him behind the barrels, they lead him out of the shed and have a look at his rope. Seeing that he chewed through his rope, they decide that they need to put a sturdier harness on him. While they’re trying to harness him, Lucky breaks free and runs away.

Lucky wanders around and hides in the woods. Getting hungry, he looks for food and eats some hay from a traveler’s sled. He runs away from most of the people he sees. He really wants to find Rainbow, and Lucky recognizes that Rainbow is black, so he runs away from any white person he sees. When he finally sees a black man coming along the road, he follows him, thinking at first the it might be Rainbow. It isn’t, but Lucky continues to follow him anyway because he reminds him of Rainbow.

The black man, whose name is Augustus, lives in a log cabin. Lucky explores around the cabin and finds a supply of hay, so he starts eating it and then goes to sleep. The next morning, Augustus comes to get some hay for his cows and finds Lucky eating it. Augustus calls to his teenage daughter, Rosalinda, to come and see the horse. He asks Rosalinda if she knows who owns this horse, but Rosalinda says that she doesn’t recognize him and doesn’t think he belongs to anybody nearby.

Augustus puts Lucky in his shed and gives him more hay to eat while he decides what to do. Since they don’t know who really owns him, Augustus decides that they should make some advertisements about the horse they found. Rosalinda knows how to read and write, so Augustus tells her what to write on the advertisements, having her make four copies. Augustus’s plan is to take their advertisements to Mix’s Corner and give them to the mail carrier to post in the tavern. Of course, Rainbow is the mail carrier.

When Augustus meets Rainbow and tells him about the horse he found, Rainbow recognizes Lucky from his description, except for the white markings the thieves painted on him. Rainbow goes with Augustus to have a look at the horse, and he realizes that the white markings are only paint. He knows that someone must have taken Lucky and painted him deliberately, although he still doesn’t know the full story behind Lucky’s disappearance. He is grateful to Augustus for finding Lucky and taking care of him, and he takes Lucky home and cleans him up.

Rainbow runs into trouble as winter begins turning into spring. The snow is still high, but it is just starting to melt, which makes it too soft and too deep for Lucky to walk on. People who live along Rainbow’s route help by trying to clear the roads where they can, so Rainbow can get through, but there are still times and places where Lucky has trouble sinking into the snow.

One day in early April, it rains, and this makes the going even more difficult. Rainbow and Lucky make it to Mix’s Corner, but the people tell him there that he shouldn’t try going further because the conditions are bad. Rainbow feels obligated to try to get the mail through anyway, so he decides that he will walk the rest of the way while leading Lucky. However, when he comes to a bridge, a stranger who lives nearby warns him not to try to cross because the bridge is unsafe. Rainbow could try to cross the stream on the ice, but with the thawing, the ice isn’t safe, either. Since there is a saw mill nearby, Rainbow decides that he can get some boards that can help him cross the ice by himself with the mail bag, but he will have to leave Lucky behind.

Rainbow arranges for the stranger to board Lucky in his barn and to help him lay the boards over the ice so he can cross. (The book explains that laying boards over thin ice can reinforce it so it can support the weight of a person when it otherwise wouldn’t. The idea is that the board will distribute the person’s weight more over the surface of the ice. It states this as a fact that young readers may already know, probably from living in areas where people do this. I’ve never lived in a place where it snows, so I’ve never had a reason to try to cross ice, but I understand the principle of weight distribution.) Rainbow says that he could also use a hand-sled to carry the mail further. The stranger doesn’t have one, but Rainbow asks to borrow his tools and makes one for himself. The man watches while Rainbow crosses the ice, and fortunately, Rainbow reaches the other side safely. Rainbow is able to successfully get the mail through, barely on time, which causes Trigget to lose a bet he made with Jerry because he didn’t think Rainbow would succeed in that weather.

This is the end of the five-book series, and the final chapter explains how our characters are doing and what is likely in store for them in the future. We are told that, “Rainbow went on very prosperously after this in all his affairs.” There are difficulties and dangers in his job, but he is successful because he is prudent and plans ahead for the difficulties he may encounter. The people along his route also help him when he needs it because he’s been so kind to them and their children. Before the end of the year, he is able to repay the loan he used to buy Lucky, so Lucky now belongs to him outright.

Because the loan worked so well for buying Lucky, some people suggest to him that he could buy some farmland in the same way. Handie recommends that he wait until he’s a little older before he does that, and if he wants to buy some land, it would be better for him to do it an area with other black people. While Rainbow gets along well enough with white people because he is so helpful, good-natured, and hard-working, Handie knows that white people don’t always treat Rainbow as well as they should, and he thinks that Rainbow would be happier with people who are like him.

Rainbow says that what he would really like to do eventually is to move to Boston and work for Colonel Hammond, the man who loaned him money to buy Lucky. Rainbow thinks he would enjoy taking care of Colonel Hammond’s horses and driving his carriage, and maybe he could buy a little house for himself so he can go to his own home in the evening. He also thinks that he would like to marry Rosalinda some day, although he hesitates to say that part out loud.

Like the other books in this series, and the series itself in general, this story is mostly slice-of-life, giving readers a look at life in the past. Originally, the places and situations in the book would have been familiar parts of daily life for its intended audience of children in the mid-19th century. Its descriptions of daily things like how blacksmiths make nails or the finer points of making wooden whistles would have just added detail to what would have been familiar to 19th century children. To people reading it in the 21st century, it adds color and dimension to the lives of people in the past, allowing us to picture the ordinary things they would do every day and to get a sense of the things they would have known.

There are adventurous aspects of the story, where Rainbow almost meets with disaster, but no matter what the situation, things always turn out well for him in the end. Sometimes, it seemed to me like the author/narrator built up excitement over Rainbow’s predicament, only for the problems to be solved more easily than expected, which can feel a little deflating. However, it is also reassuring that nothing truly disastrous happens to Rainbow and Lucky in the end, making a gentler read.

Although most of the emphasis of these stories is on daily life, and they’re pretty gentle to read, racial issues are always in the background. Rainbow is always aware that white people look at him differently because of his race, and that this can be a source of potential problems. It’s one of the reasons why he goes out of his way to build up good will with other people, so people come to like him and treat him better. For the most part, this strategy works. The author intended the stories to be educational for children, and there is a lot in the series about how to understand and get along with other people.

Sometimes, people say rude things to Rainbow about his race and appearance. There are three instances where the n-word is used in the entire series, once in the third book, Three Pines, and two times in one scene in this final book, although there are also other, lesser derogatory comments. In vintage children’s books, the way people speak can be clues to their character, and the author of this series particularly likes to examine people’s character and motives. In the second book in the series, Rainbow’s Journey, we had the example of a disreputable man who turns out to be a thief. He is the first person who makes derogatory comments about Rainbow and insists that he doesn’t want to sit near him on the stage coach. Trigget, who is driving the stage coach, tells him off for doing that, and other people laugh at him because they know that he is a disreputable and ill-mannered person in general. I’ve seen other vintage children’s books that use derogatory racial language and attitudes as signs that a character is ill-bred or generally ignorant.

What interested me about this particular series is that the people who use the n-word, characterized as the worst possible language to use, are not the worst characters, just as people. I found that interesting because the characters’ badness wasn’t directly proportionate to the bad language they used. The first person to use the n-word, in the third book, does it during a tirade against Rainbow because he has come to deliver Handie’s refusal to loan her his saw. Basically, she throws a temper tantrum, and she uses the worst possible language she can against the messenger while she’s having her fit just because she’s angry and wants to make him feel as bad as she feels. It’s simply childishness. During their interactions with her and descriptions of how well she doesn’t get along with her other neighbors, the author makes it clear that she is a highly emotional person with little or no sense of self-control, what we might call “no filter” today. For whatever reason, she has little or no ability to regulate her emotions or control the way she expresses them, like she’s permanently stuck in her terrible twos as an adult. Other people besides Rainbow also find her difficult to deal with because of the way she acts, and even she sometimes feels embarrassed about the things she says and does. However, she gradually becomes a more helpful and sympathetic character because the kind, controlled way that Handie and Rainbow respond to her inspires her to improve herself and to put forth a better image.

The two men who use the n-word in this story are different from all of the above. The author characterizes them as being merely thoughtless, especially the first man to do it. I partly believe that because, even after getting to know Rainbow better and appreciating his help, they don’t seem to experience any regret or even realize just how aggravating and offensive Rainbow found their language. The first man in particular, who just casually calls Rainbow the n-word when he’s idly wondering who he is the first time he approaches, is totally clueless. The author characterizes him as being a good man who says his prayers and later even adds a prayer for Rainbow because he’s grateful for Rainbow’s help, never even seems to have an inkling of the bad impression he made on Rainbow with just that comment. In the end, he focuses on how pleased he himself is with Rainbow’s help and totally misses that he’s not completely satisfactory in his own behavior. Rainbow is reconciled to that and appreciates when the man behaves better, accepting him for what he is, but it rankles with me because this man is, in fact, a grown man, and grown people without a clue are just plain aggravating. It just never even dawns on him that he’s done anything that anybody even might object to, and that level of obliviousness drives me crazy. Now, some modern readers might just brush this off as “just the way people talked bad then” and that he didn’t put enough thought into it to really mean anything by it, but I’m not buying it in this instance, for two reasons. In the first place, not everybody is talking like this. Some people realize that this is an ill-mannered and inappropriate way to talk, and they say so. Second, the second man’s comment adds a qualifier on this word that implies that there was more thought behind this comment that even the author of the book isn’t going into.

After the first man makes that off-handed slur, the second man uses the n-word himself, but he does it in the context of telling the first man not to say that until he finds out “whether he deserves it,” meaning whether Rainbow deserves it. It’s this qualifying statement, which is never explained, that makes me uneasy about the assertion that these guys are just “thoughtless.” In order for there to be an evaluation of who “deserves” this language and who doesn’t, there has to be a certain amount of thought into what the term implies and some kind of standard to judge who fits this term and who doesn’t. Rainbow takes the second man’s comment as reassuring, that the man is giving him a chance to prove himself without judging him immediately, but it doesn’t reassure me because I can tell that there is some standard being applied here, it’s a standard that both of the men seem to understand and believe in, I think it’s a negative standard, and I don’t have confidence in their ability to accurately assess other people.

There are reasons why Rainbow and others feel especially insulted by this word and why it’s considered even worse than other words that are also considered rude. To put it mildly, the n-word implies highly unfavorable things about the person being described, and it implies them to a greater degree even that other insulting words. In general, it carries connotations of worthlessness and a sub-human, animal-like state. I know that the men in the story are definitely thinking about some of the unfavorable implications and evaluating them seriously because the second man says that they will see if Rainbow “deserves” the term in a way that says he realizes that the first man may be insulting Rainbow needlessly. I guess it’s nicer to give Rainbow a chance to show his true character before they render judgement, but it’s still troubling because this conversation reveals that these characters do believe that some of the implications of the n-word are accurate about some people and that they think themselves accurate judges of that. It bothers me because I don’t believe either of those things. While I don’t like some people, I don’t think that calling someone sub-human or worthless, particularly just based on race. Also, I have no confidence in the standards or abilities of these people to accurately assess the relative worth of their fellow human beings in general. To be blunt, I believe that self-awareness is a prerequisite for understanding other people, and I don’t think either of these men have much self-awareness. The fact that both men have totally missed the affect that their attitudes have on Rainbow and the effort he has to make to work with them for free just to help them that day makes me think that neither one of them has the capacity to be accurate in their general understanding of other people or to read any individual in particular, even though they have appointed themselves as the judges of the situation. Even after spending all afternoon with him and seeming to get along with him, even noting his initial hesitation to accept the offer to stay for dinner, they still don’t get it. They just never give it a second thought.

You might wonder why does that bothers me so much, if they all managed to get along well enough anyway. I’ll tell you why. How many other people do you suppose they’ve labeled n-words before because those people reacted negatively to them, specifically because they’re clueless and provoked them, and they’ve just never had the self-awareness to realize that they caused it all themselves? I don’t know the overall number, but I could guess that the percentage is likely 100%. Because they have no self-awareness or situational awareness, they casually create bad impressions with the first words out of their mouths. The casual nature of their behavior indicates that this is habitual with them. They are completely comfortable with doing something that makes everyone else uncomfortable because they do it often and think nothing of it.

The author somewhat implies that these men are likely to provoke negative reactions from black people they just casually meet by pointing out that Rainbow could have turned around and walked away at the first mention of the n-word. The only reason why he didn’t do that and leave them there, probably saying that he must have been an n-word, is that he decided to give them a second chance when they didn’t even know that they’d blown the first impression. Rainbow didn’t really have to give them that chance since he was planning to volunteer his services to them, and he didn’t owe them his time or work. Many other people, including me, probably would have walked away with maybe a dirty look and not a single word, and these guys wouldn’t have had a clue why. These guys would probably mutter “What’s their problem?” to that reaction, never realizing that the only problem is their behavior. It bothers me that, even after getting to know Rainbow better, they still don’t know that they almost drove him away or why, and they don’t seem to have any regrets about what they said or realize that Rainbow ever had a problem with it. Because they don’t realize that their behavior is a problem, they’re probably going to do it again with someone else because no real lessons have been learned here. While they have apparently labeled Rainbow as “not an n-word” kind of black person in their minds, nothing has changed the notion that they still have that other people are, so they will probably repeat this process with other black people they meet, cluelessly provoking others and probably blaming them for being provoked. Until someone lays it out for them, they’re just not going to get it, and even then, they might still not because they feel justified and don’t see themselves as others see them.

I’ve said it before that some of the world’s most judgemental people often forget that other people can also look back at them and make their own evaluations of their behavior and character. The author of the story may consider these men as basically good but thoughtless, but bringing up the subject of who “deserves” to be called certain things also raises the question of who really deserves the label of “good.” “Good” is a relative term that comes with levels and gradations. I’d like to to make it plain that, while these men may be good in some ways, I don’t see them as being as good as other characters who also do good things but without talking the way they do. While I’m sure that they’re more law-abiding than the thief from the second book in general character, they rank behind many other characters in my evaluation. Handie, Trigget, and the Holdens all come before them in my estimation, for several reasons. Not only are these characters demonstrably ethical in their dealings with other people, but they give Rainbow a chance to demonstrate his good side to them without making it clear that they were factoring his race/appearance into their assessment of his character. In fact, they explicitly make it clear that they will not do that. More than that, each of them also stands up for Rainbow and/or shows consideration for his well-being. The take his feelings and situation into account, where the men we’re discussing are mostly concerned with what Rainbow can do for them. Even though they later pray for him, the prayer is based around what Rainbow did for them. While I like the fact that they’re showing gratitude for what they’ve received, which is a positive trait, that sense that they’re approaching it from the angle that Rainbow turned out to be a pretty good guy for someone who might have been just an n-word takes the shine off the apple.

It occurs to me that, in pointing out that these men are “good” in spite of their bad/thoughtless behavior, in a way, the author is almost repeating the sentiment of the man who said that they shouldn’t use derogatory language against Rainbow until they see whether or not he deserves to be regarded in a derogatory way. The author seems to be trying to look on the positive side and to encourage readers to find the positive side of other people, even ones who behave badly, but at the same time, there does seem to be an acknowledgement that they did behave badly and that it would take extra effort to get past that bad behavior to their better sides and to see that they might not be totally bad. Yes, these men are acting like rude and clueless racists. However, there is apparently more to their personalities than that. The author would like us to reserve judgement on these men long enough for them to show their true natures and demonstrate that, in fact, they are thoughtlessly rude and clueless and also seem to have some racist attitudes, but they can make exceptions to their racist preconceptions to accept good deeds from particular individuals whom they might otherwise have disdained for their race and remember to be thankful for what they have received and say their prayers.

The second part of that is good, but the first part of that hasn’t gone away. Maybe that’s less bad than if the sum total of their personalities was to swagger around and dish out the slurs and crude language, but less bad isn’t quite the same as “good.” They show gratitude after receiving something but not graciousness on meeting. To me, their up sides just doesn’t make me feel that much better about them, especially since these guys don’t seem to have learned anything from the experience and seem likely to repeat it. At least, Mrs. Blooman learned something and improved. These guys just managed to get through an afternoon and make a business deal for continued services for their project. I can see that the author is trying to demonstrate how issues like this can be smoothed over with good behavior on the part of other people so that people can get along, but I just find it difficult to buy the assertion that these men are that much better than they first seem to be when their good sides don’t seem to have an affect on their bad ones, and they don’t demonstrate a change in thinking or behavior.

After all my analyzing and ranting, what do I think of this book’s potential to teach us more about racial attitudes and interactions during the mid-19th century?

First, I like the fact that the author examines different types of characters who have different motives for their behavior. Human beings have wide-ranging personality types, and I can believe that each of the characters in the story represents the behavior and personality type of people who really existed. I can believe that a genuinely shady person, like the thief, would also have crude manners or racist beliefs due to a bad upbringing or general anti-social attitudes. (I’m guessing that someone who makes their living by taking advantage of their fellow humans and their belongings generally doesn’t hold other people in high regard and might have disdain for particular groups of people.) I have seen people with temperamental natures and poor impulse control, like Mrs. Blooman, and I can believe that someone like her could say some pretty awful things without necessarily meaning them seriously just because she’s lashing out at others during a tantrum. I could believe that the author might have based her on someone he’d seen in real life. I do also believe that the descriptions of the men using the n-word in this book could be realistic, even though I’ve already explained (ranted) about how I don’t look at them quite the way the author does. I believe that they are thoughtless and that they don’t realize the real problems with their behavior or the effect they have on others because they don’t examine their own motives or look at their behavior from someone else’s perspective. They probably also think that they are basically okay because they’re religious, even while provoking people and testing their patience (including mine). All of these types of people seem realistic enough, and some even remind me of people I’ve seen.

However, the second point to keep in mind that the author’s main goal is to write educational stories for children. He’s always in the role of teacher, whether he’s explaining the fine details behind daily things, examining people’s characters, or offering advice on how to behave or deal with someone else’s behavior. Because he is trying to demonstrate the ways that people should act and how people can be influenced to improve their behavior, even the problem people Rainbow meets can generally be managed, and some of them really do improve, at least to some degree. The author is trying to encourage positive behavior and positive outlooks in his young readers.

While I think that his attempts to set good examples are excellent, part of me knows that, in real life, not everybody really does change for the better from the kind behavior of people they disdain. In fact, some people can become increasingly resentful when someone they don’t like seems to be behaving better than they are because they feel like the other person is just acting that way to show them up, so they act contrary to good behavior the other person is showing just to make it clear that the other person can’t influence them. (In modern terms, “vice-signalling” as a response to “virtue-signalling.” ex. “Oh, you don’t like the Confederate flag? Well, I’ve got it waving outside my house, and I’m gonna get it painted on my truck and wear a shirt with it every day! I’ll show you!”) Mrs. Blooman changes her behavior because she feels ashamed of her lack of control and inspired to improve by seeing how well Handie and Rainbow behave. However, in real life, other people might double down on their bad behavior because they feel like they’ve got something to prove, like they’re “strong” for not being influenced by anybody, not even for the better, or because they want to show that they’ve got contempt for other people, no matter what they do. The examples of people and behavior that the author shows throughout this series tend to lean toward the milder side, although there are small implications that Rainbow has seen worse before and that worse and less manageable people are out there.

There are some instances where the author references more difficult and more racist people without directly showing them in the story. For example, we know from the first book in the series that Rainbow wasn’t allowed to go to the small school in his small town because people made it clear that he wasn’t welcome there. Yet, we don’t really see the people in his town abusing him, and people generally seem to like him for being good-natured. Even though we don’t see the people in his town being bad to him or disliking him, we know that they don’t fully accept him and that some have particularly excluded him. When the lawyer managing Handie’s inheritance tells him that he might run into trouble while traveling with Rainbow because some people might not be willing to rent a room to a black person or have a black person dine with them, I expected that this would happen at some point in the story, but it never does. There’s never an instance where they have to try more than one inn, tavern, or boarding house because they are refused service at the first one they tried. There is just that acknowledgement that some people are like that and that it causes problems, but the author doesn’t provide examples of some of the people with the worst behavior.

Overall, my feeling is that the books demonstrate not how everyone behaved during the mid-19th century but how the author would like young readers to behave and how they should respond to examples of poor behavior from other people without becoming angry and overly negative. I think these are useful lessons, and I’d like to think that at least some of the author’s young readers benefited from them. Some pieces of advice that the author provides make sense to me, like maintaining your own good behavior and kindness even in the face of provocation and leaving other people with the echoes of their own bad words rather than returning a flippant comment that might turn negative attention on yourself. The author does provide some insight on how people thought and behaved during the 19th century and how they wanted to inspire the next generation to behave for the better. However, I do know that, in real life, there are even more variations of people that the author doesn’t delve into, particularly some of the more harmful kinds, who do more than just use a bad word, and the kinds that are less likely to change. I think that a modern version of the same story would probably feature some of these darker elements of human behavior, although I also think it would do a disservice to the nature of the story to go too far in the negative direction and forget the positive side that the author wanted to promote. In general, I prefer a balanced approach that includes both the more negative aspects of humanity and the positive ones because I think reality does combine both.

There is one final issue that I’d like to discuss, and that’s the author’s thoughts aobut adults who don’t want to answer children’s questions or try to prevent children from asking questions about difficult topics. The author points out that some adults feel like the children aren’t ready to hear the answers for the questions they’re asking, but the truth is that the questions themselves are the children’s attempts to gain knowledge and make themselves ready for growing up and living in the world. Often, the adults’ insecurity with their ability to handle difficult questions from children that are the problem. It does matter how you answer children’s questions at their level of understanding, and I think the author is correct that it’s best to take things in steps. My own thought is that if kids are ready to ask a question, they are ready to hear an answer, although as the author points out, it doesn’t have to be the most detailed or complete answer. Partial ones can do for a beginning with more details provided later. You can figure out the steps to take by talking to the children and figuring out where they are in their current understanding, but if you shut down their discussion and questions, you’ve closed off that insight into what the children know and really need to understand.

I think that this issue of what children are ready to ask or to learn relates to children’s literature in modern censorship issues. Some adults want more control over what their children read because they think that they aren’t ready for certain things or that certain things will never be appropriate for their kids. Yet, if the kids didn’t have enough understanding about particular topics to be curious about them and want more information or have the reading level necessary for books on these topics, maybe the case is more that the kids are more ready to tackle the tough issues of life than the parents are to see their kids starting to understand these things.

I really don’t have any personal experience of adults censoring my reading when I was a child. My own parents never restricted the books I read or told me that I couldn’t read certain things. They weren’t hanging over my shoulder all the time while I was looking up books at the library or looking through what I selected before I checked it out, although they did talk to me about what I was reading. That wasn’t just because they were playing the Knowledge Police; it was more because my parents just generally liked to talk to me and to know what I was thinking about and what was going on in my life. As an adult looking back, I think that my parents just being interested in my thoughts and approaching issues as part of a conversation instead of a lecture probably did more for me in terms of increasing my range of understanding and methods of expressing myself than if they had tried to be authoritarian and controlling.

My parents also liked to read, and they would tell me about books they were reading, so I would tell them about what I was reading. We could and did talk about things that bothered me or questions I had. The way I evaluate books on this blog or rant about issues and characters I don’t like are pretty much the way I’ve always talked about these things with my parents and friends and, really, anybody who would sit still long enough. Generally, my family is full of people with strong opinions, and we are not usually the type to keep things to ourselves when there are things that bother us. We also do not tend to let go of things we don’t understand, at least not easily. Because my parents and I talked to each other, they generally knew what was going on with me, when there was a complicated issue bothering me, and if I had questions about things. Because they liked to explain things as much as I do, I typically would get an answer to whatever I asked. If I brought up a topic that they didn’t approve of, they would just tell me why they didn’t like it, just like I now explain the parts of books I don’t like. The more I think about it, the more I think that my wide-ranging interesting and the way I express myself in writing are really reflections of what I was allowed to read and talk about when I was young. At this point, I could well imagine that people who don’t like some of the things that I have to say or how wordy I am when I say them taking this as evidence that shutting down children’s conversation and limiting their range of knowledge and self-expression may have some benefits, but that’s the risk we all take.

Stories of Rainbow and Lucky: Selling Lucky

This is the fourth book in the Stories of Rainbow and Lucky series. I’ve already started covering this series, and I have to do all five books in a row because the series is set up like a mini-series. That is, none of the books in the series can stand alone; they are all installments of one, longer story. They only make sense together.

It’s an unusual series from the mid-19th century, written on the eve of the American Civil War, by a white author with a young black hero. Rainbow is a teenage black boy who, in the previous installments of the story, is hired by a young carpenter, Handie, who is just a few years older than he is to help him with a job in another town, working on renovating a farm house that Handie has inherited. The rest of the series follows the two young men, particularly Rainbow, through their adventures leaving their small town for the first time, learning life lessons, and even dealing with difficult topics like racism. Lucky is a horse who belongs to a neighbor of Handie’s new farm, and Rainbow has befriended him.

The story is unusual for this time period because it was uncommon for black people to be the heroes of books and for topics like racism to be discussed directly. It’s also important to point out that our black hero is not a slave, he is not enslaved at any point in the series, and the series has a happy ending for him. People don’t always treat him right, but he does have friends and allies, and he manages to deal with the adversity he faces and builds a future for himself. Keep in mind along the way that there are a lot of pun names in this series and that people’s names are often clues to their characters.

This particular installment in the series focuses on the horse, Lucky. Lucky’s owner has decided to sell him, and she asks Handie and Rainbow to take Lucky from the town of Southerton to Boston to sell him. Along the way, they have encounters with thieves and further trouble with racism. However, the story ends happily for both Rainbow and Lucky.

This book is easily available to read online in your browser through NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN CHILDREN & WHAT THEY READ, I’m going to do a detailed summary below. If you’d rather read it yourself before you read my review, you can go ahead, but some people might want to know what it’s like in more detail.

The first three books in the series focused on Handie’s inheritance of the Three Pines farm, how he hired Rainbow to help him fix it up, their travels to the farm, and their adventures with their new neighbors there. Now, the summer is over, and they have returned to their own small town, but the adventures aren’t over yet.

It’s October, and since his time working for Handie over the summer as a carpenter’s apprentice, 14-year-old Rainbow’s own carpentry skills have improved, and he has bought himself a set of his own tools. Although Rainbow has faced his share of racism, even from people in his own small town, he is generally well-liked by most people because he is kind, friendly, and a good worker. He is still friends with a little white boy named Solomon, who lives nearby. Solomon looks up to Rainbow like an older brother because Rainbow spends time with him, especially since young Solomon’s father died. Solomon has started helping Rainbow with some of his work projects, as a kind of junior assistant. That’s what they are doing when Handie comes with a letter that he has just received from Southerton, the town where the Three Pines farm is.

During the course of the previous book, they befriended a difficult neighbor named Mrs. Blooman, who is the owner of the spirited colt called Lucky. Rainbow, who loves horses and has a talent for handling animals, made friends with Lucky, and he is still the person who is best able to handle him. Mrs. Blooman has had difficulty handling Lucky herself (which is partly her own fault, as the previous book explains), and she has now decided that she wants to sell Lucky. Since nobody handles Lucky as well as Rainbow does, she wants to hire Rainbow to take Lucky to Boston, find a buyer for him, and arrange the sale.

Rainbow is amazed at the job offer. The trip to Southerton was pretty momentous for him, and Boston is farther than he’s ever been, and he has never handled a horse sale before. Still, the money is good, and Rainbow really does like Lucky. Handie suggests that Rainbow think it over and talk to his mother about it. Rainbow is still a minor under the law, but his mother consents for him to take the job, and Handie accompanies Rainbow to Southerton again to pick up Lucky.

In the second book in the series, Handie and Rainbow traveled to Southerton by stage coach, and now, they’re making the same trip again with the same driver, Trigget. Since Trigget is a friend of theirs, they once again ride on top of the stage coach with him, so they can talk along the way, instead of riding inside. Trigget says that they have to stop to pick up another passenger, a young man who is bound for college. Trigget is disparaging of college-educated young men because he thinks that college makes them conceited. However, when college-boy William joins them, he turns out to be more friendly and personable than Trigget thought. Instead of sitting inside the coach, he decides that he would also like to ride on top and chat with them. The author/narrator uses this opportunity to point out that pre-conceived notions about what people are like are often wrong, and you can’t entirely depend on another person’s assessment of what someone else is like:

“Indeed, I think it may be laid down as a general rule, that if you hear a specially unfavorable account of any person whom you do not know, you will find, when you come to get acquainted with him, that he does not more than half deserve the ill account which was given of him. On the other hand, when you hear any one who is a stranger to you very extravagantly commended for certain excellent qualities which he is supposed to possess, you will find, if you come to know him intimately, that he is, after all, not so remarkable as you had been led to expect. People are very prone to exaggerate both the faults and the excellencies of those of whom they speak, by way of making what they say more striking and interesting to those who hear it.”

As they start their journey, Handie and Rainbow catch up with the changes in Trigget’s life since they last saw him. Trigget has gotten married and bought a house. He tells them about the house he bought, which used to belong to another person they also knew. The house needs some fixing up, but Trigget considers it a good deal that was beneficial to both himself and the selling. 

William protests that no deal can be beneficial to both the buyer and seller at the same time because, to his way of thinking, what defines a beneficial deal is the price of what is being sold. If the price is lower than the value of the product, the deal is beneficial to the buyer, and if the price is higher than the value of the product, the deal is beneficial to the seller. Since the price can’t be both higher and lower than the value of the product at the same time, William can’t see how the deal could benefit both the buyer and seller at the same time. (My first thought was, what if the price is neither higher nor lower but simply is the value of the product? However, there are other logical fallacies in William’s argument, as the narrator and the character point out.) The other characters debate the general idea of what makes a deal beneficial, putting forth the idea that the value of anything for sale can be difficult to pinpoint because value may be based on non-tangible aspects of the deal. For example, the same house may be worth more to one person than to another because, aside from the value of the physical aspects of the house, the house may be better suited to the circumstances of the buyer than to the seller, making the buyer view the house as being worth more than the seller might think of it. Rainbow listens to this discussion with interest because he will soon be arranging the sale of Lucky, and he wants the deal he makes to be beneficial to everyone involved.

After they get to Southerton, Rainbow receives instructions for how he can find a buyer and arrange a sale. It will take about four days of travel to reach Boston from Southerton, and Mrs. Blooman is providing money for his traveling expenses. Rainbow will go there on horseback, riding Lucky, and after he sells Lucky, he will return by train. (Unless he fails to sell Lucky, in which case, he is to ride Lucky back to Southerton.) When he gets to Boston, Rainbow is to present Lucky to the owner of a particular stable, Mr. Miles, and this stable-owner will help him to find a buyer for Lucky, if he doesn’t want Lucky himself. Rainbow also has the option to sell Lucky before reaching Boston, provided that he can find a suitable buyer who is willing to pay an acceptable price. 

Handie also gives Rainbow a letter of introduction to present to Mr. Miles, verifying his identity and that he is working for Mrs. Blooman and arranging the sale of Lucky on her behalf. Handie also presents Rainbow with a “certificate”, which he obtained on Rainbow’s behalf from the selectmen of their town before they left home. The “certificate”, as Handie describes it, is a “sort of universal letter of introduction.” This story is set long before drivers’ licenses and other, modern forms of identification, so from a modern standpoint, it performs the functions of an ID card with an added statement on the nature of the subject’s character. The certificate verifies Rainbow’s identity, the fact that is a citizen of his town, that he is known to his town’s leaders, and that he has a good character and can be considered trustworthy, for the benefit of everyone who needs to know any of that. It is signed by the selectmen (the town’s leaders) and says:

“This may certify that the bearer of this, commonly called Rainbow, colored boy, is well known to us, and to all the people of this town, and that he is a boy of excellent character. He is honest, truthful, and trustworthy. He speaks the truth and keeps his promises, and he needs no watching. He is accordingly hereby recommended, as a safe and reliable boy, to all who may have any dealings with him.”

Rainbow puts these important papers in his wallet. Then, he and Handie further discuss the arrangements with Mrs. Blooman. Rainbow wants to know if he needs to arrange a contract or memorandum in writing about their arrangements, but Handie says that this is unnecessary for this type of job. He says that women acting on their own don’t like to arrange contracts in writing like that, but he will act as a witness of the agreement between them, in case there is any dispute later. Handie is a good witness because, while he does care about Rainbow’s welfare and success as a friend, he has no legal or financial claims on the business between him and Mrs. Blooman. Neither of them thinks that there will be any difficult over the arrangement, but it’s important to consider these things, just in case.

Before they leave on the trip to Boston, Rainbow talks to Lucky about how he is going to be sold. Rainbow is sad about that because he likes Lucky and doesn’t expect to see him again after the sale. He thinks these few days that they’ll have together while they’re traveling will be their last time together.

Rainbow says that he wishes Handie would buy Lucky and let Rainbow train him and rent him. Trigget has told Rainbow that, if he can get a horse, he will hire Rainbow to carry mail, so if Handie bought Lucky, Rainbow could pay to rent him out of the wages he would earn as a mail carrier. Handie says that he wishes he could buy Lucky, so they could have that arrangement, but the problem is that Handie doesn’t have enough money to buy him and can’t borrow any more right now. He’s already working off a loan from the first book in the series, and he doesn’t think he can take on such a large expense right now. If Handie and Rainbow can’t buy Lucky themselves, they’re just going to have to let someone else buy him.

Rainbow sets out with Lucky the next day. Because he is riding Lucky to Boston, Handie is not going with him, and he is traveling completely alone for the first time. When they first start out, Lucky assumes that they are just going on one of the routine errands around the town, and as they keep going further and further, he starts getting more uneasy. He keeps wanting to turn back and looks for an opportunity to run away and go home. He almost gets away from Rainbow when they stop to eat, but Rainbow stops him and manages to calm him enough that he can get control of Lucky again.

As Rainbow continues his travels, he gets some questions about his horse from curious people he meets. A couple of them make offers to buy him or suggestions about where he might find a buyer, but none of them leads to anything. Some people make jokes or call him names, but Rainbow ignores them. At one point, he helps a boy with an injured foot, and the boy’s grateful mother gives him supper. She offers to let him spend the night, but he says that he wants to get further before the day ends.

Eventually, he stops at a cheap tavern and asks for a room. They say that he can stay the night, and he puts Lucky in their barn for the night. A black woman working in the kitchen gives Rainbow dinner and says that she will make up a bed for him, but Rainbow says that he would rather sleep in the barn to be near Lucky. It’s a good thing that he does because he overhears a couple of suspicious men he saw earlier talking about stealing his horse (and using some derogatory language about him while they do it). At first, they consider taking Lucky out of the barn that night, but then, they think about how people at the tavern have seen them and might identify them. Instead, they talk about waylaying Rainbow and Lucky further down the road, in the woods. After the men leave, Rainbow talks to Lucky, reassuring him. He also makes a pun about their use of the word “black” to describe him, saying to Lucky that these men seem like the real “black fellows.” (I think he’s referring to “black” in the old-fashioned, literary sense of “evil or sinister”, in this case. These sinister men are “black” in different way than Rainbow is, and it’s a much worse way.) Forewarned of their plans, Rainbow takes steps to make sure that the men can’t get into the barn again that night, and he foils their plans to steal Lucky the next day.

After this experience, Rainbow decides that traveling through smaller towns and country roads is too risky. He thinks that he might be safer from thieves if he sticks to better-traveled roads and bigger towns. When he comes to a larger town, he rents a room at a tavern for the night, and he is approached by a man who calls himself Mr. Truman. Mr. Truman is interested in buying Lucky, and he invites Rainbow to come to his room later to discuss it. The author/narrator informs readers immediately that Mr. Truman is a criminal, so there is no suspense about that, but there is some suspense about how or whether Rainbow will realize it in time to avoid being cheated by him or turning Lucky over to him.

When Rainbow meets with Mr. Truman later about Lucky, Mr. Truman agrees to the price that Mrs. Blooman wants for Lucky. Rainbow is pleased about finding a potential buyer who is willing to pay the right price, and he shows Mr. Truman the papers he has to prove that he is authorized to sell the horse. Mr. Truman asks Rainbow if he will return to Southerton immediately after selling Lucky, and Rainbow says that his plan is to take the train back. Mr. Truman suggests that they meet the next morning at the local train station, shortly before the train to Southerton will leave, to carry out the sale of Lucky, and Rainbow agrees.

However, after leaving Mr. Truman’s room, Rainbow begins to have some doubts about the deal and Mr. Truman himself. On the one hand, he was pleased to get an agreement to buy Lucky so easily, but on the other hand, he realizes that he doesn’t really know anything about Mr. Truman. Maybe Mr. Truman won’t show up to the train station at all to buy Lucky, or if he does, maybe he won’t bring the amount of money he agreed to pay or the money could be counterfeit. Because they agreed to meet shortly before the train will leave, Rainbow realizes that he won’t have much time to count the money or verify that money is real before the train leaves. Maybe that’s part of Mr. Truman’s plan.

Rainbow decides to ask the staff at the tavern what they know about Mr. Truman, but nobody there is able to tell them much. He’s just a man who arrived at the tavern recently and rented a room. Nobody there knows much about him, his background, or his business. Rainbow feels a little more uneasy, and he decides that, when they meet at the train station, he will ask the man who runs the ticket office to help him count the money and verify that the money is good because he figures that the person who sells the train tickets is accustomed to handling money and will know if there’s anything wrong with Mr. Truman’s payment.

When Rainbow arrives at the train station the next day, he finds the ticket seller, shows him his identification papers, and explains to him about the sale of Lucky and that he would like him to observe the sale and verify Mr. Truman’s payment to him. The ticket seller, Mr. Jones, seems intrigued by his request. He and some other men in the station’s freight office discuss Mr. Truman, and none of them know of anyone by that name in this town. Mr. Jones asks Rainbow some further questions about where he met Mr. Truman and what he knows about him. Although Rainbow doesn’t know it, there has been talk in this town about counterfeiters, and there has been some bad money found in the town. What Rainbow says about Mr. Truman awakens some suspicions that Mr. Jones and the other men have had about the origins of the bad money. Mr. Jones and the other men explain to Rainbow what they know about counterfeit money being spread in the town. They agree to witness the sale of Lucky, but they give Rainbow specific instructions about what to do and say so that Mr. Truman won’t sense their suspicions about him too soon and run away before they have evidence against him.

When Mr. Truman comes to buy Lucky, he seems unsettled when Rainbow calls Mr. Jones over to count and verify the money. Mr. Truman tries to make an excuse about wanting to talk to someone so he can leave, but the other men stop him, and he is arrested by an officer. Rainbow is astonished that his vague suspicions about Mr. Truman were correct and that Mr. Truman is an even worse criminal that he thought. He is also relieved that he didn’t go through with selling Lucky to this man. Rainbow offers to pay Mr. Jones for his help in observing the sale and stopping him from making a bad deal, but Mr. Jones says that isn’t necessary. After all, Rainbow has also provided a service by helping to expose the counterfeiter who has been spreading bad money all over town. As a reward for helping to catch the counterfeiter, Mr. Jones provides Rainbow with a pass for himself and a place for Lucky in the horse-box on the next train to Boston, saving them time and money on their journey. He even makes Rainbow’s ticket a round-trip ticket so that he can return to Southerton by train when his business in Boston is concluded.

Lucky, being a horse, finds the train ride upsetting and disorienting. At first, Rainbow isn’t sure which car he should enter or where he should sit on the train, but the brakeman tells him he can sit wherever he likes because “they don’t pay any attention to color on this road, except it be the color of their money.” In other words, this train isn’t racially segregated; all they care about is whether or not the passengers have bought tickets. The brakeman explains more about how hard his work is as a brakeman, which is very hard for the money is paid. Nobody pays him enough to care about passengers’ race as well. Rainbow asks him why he stays in the job, since it sounds pretty demanding, and the brakeman says that it was hard enough to just get this job; getting another, different job would be even harder.

Since the train is about to leave, Rainbow gets on and looks around for an open seat. There are some ladies on board who have filled up some vacant seats with their parcels. Rainbow doesn’t want to disturb them, but a well-dressed young man, looking for a seat himself and seeing Rainbow’s difficulty in finding a place to sit, says that he will find a place for them both. Because the young man is handsome and charming, he is able to convince a young lady to allow him to put her parcels in the upper rack so that he and Rainbow can have the seats she was using for them. When the young man tells a story about how it is wrong to take more than a person has paid for, such as taking up multiple seats when she has only paid for just one, he tells it so charmingly and not in a directly accusing way, that the lady isn’t offended by it. The young man indicates that he thinks that men do this less often on trains than ladies because they are more acquainted with the transactional nature of train travel.

When Rainbow says that this is his first time traveling by train, the man lets Rainbow have the window seat so he can enjoy the view. Rainbow finds the view whizzing past the window as disorienting as Lucky does, although he enjoys it much more. As he watches the scenery moving past, he wonders why it seems like objects that are closer to the train move by faster than ones that are further away. He is tempted to ask the young man about it, but before he can think how to ask the question, the young man gets up from his seat.

When the train reaches Boston, Rainbow reclaims Lucky from the horse-box, and they set out to find Mr. Miles’s stables. Rainbow tries to ask a newsboy for directions, but the newsboy makes fun of him instead, teasing him about his race, “Say, Pompey, how came you both to be so black, you and your horse? Did he catch it of you, or did you catch it of him?” Rainbow ignores him and finds someone else to ask.

Getting around in Boston is tricky, especially for a person who has never been to the city before. A butcher tells Rainbow that the full instructions would be too complicated for him to understand and remember all at once, so he advises Rainbow to take it in steps. He gives Rainbow a part of the directions to his destination, the first street he needs to go down and the first turn he needs to make, and then advises him to ask the next person he sees when he has gone that far. Rainbow continues to ask directions of people in this way, and through a series of questions and answers and getting lost a couple of times, he gradually makes progress and finds his destination.

When Rainbow finds Mr. Miles’s stable, he shows Mr. Miles his papers and explains why he has brought Lucky there. Mr. Miles has one of his workers put Lucky in the stables, and he talks to Rainbow about his journey. He is impressed by the story about how he helped catch the counterfeiter, and he shows Rainbow to a restaurant where he can buy some dinner before they take a look at Lucky and discuss finding a buyer for him. When Rainbow returns, Mr. Miles examines Lucky carefully, and he is pleased with Lucky’s condition. He thinks that he won’t have any trouble finding a buyer for Lucky who will be willing to pay the price that Mrs. Blooman requests.

Soon, a man and a young boy come to the stables, and the boy is immediately fascinated with Lucky. The boy, called Johnny, says that he would like to ride Lucky, and Rainbow offers to take him for a ride because he has taken other boys for rides on Lucky before. The man, who is called Colonel Hammond (often simply called “the colonel”), agrees that Johnny can have a ride with Rainbow. While they have their ride, the colonel talks to Mr. Miles about Rainbow and Lucky. 

The colonel agrees that Lucky seems like a fine young horse, and he would consider buying him, but he already owns many other horses and doesn’t need another one. He is impressed with how well Rainbow handles Lucky and how well he works with young Johnny and asks Mr. Miles what he knows about him. Mr. Miles shows the colonel the identification papers that Rainbow provided to him, and the colonel is pleased with the statement about Rainbow’s character. He asks Mr. Miles about Rainbow’s plans while he is in the city. Mr. Miles doesn’t quite know about Rainbow’s plans, although he knows that he will probably be there for another day or two while they’re looking for a buyer for Lucky. Mr. Miles is planning to offer Rainbow a place to stay among the hostlers in the stable. The colonel says that he would like to invite Rainbow to stay at his house.

The colonel asks Rainbow if he would be willing to drive young Johnny home in the chaise and tells him that, if he would be willing to stay at his house while he’s in Boston, he would be welcome. Rainbow is happy to take Johnny home, and the colonel says that he if goes to the side door of the house and asks for Phebe, she will take care of him. Rainbow takes Johnny home and then drives the chaise back to the stable. He asks Mr. Miles if he should accept the colonel’s offer to stay with him, and Mr. Miles says that would be a good idea. The colonel is a wealthy man with a good reputation.

Rainbow returns to the colonel’s house again and asks for Phebe. Phebe is a black woman who works for the colonel, and she is expecting him. The two of them talk about Rainbow’s journey to Boston, and Rainbow also tells her about his home town. Then, Phebe suggests that he visit the colonel’s stable to see his horses. The colonel’s private stable is relatively small, much smaller than Mr. Miles’s stable, and there are two horses there. The colonel owns more horses than these two, but he boards the others with Mr. Miles. Rainbow is pleased with the stable and horses, and he helps the man who works in the stable until it’s time for supper.

Rainbow has supper with Phebe, and Colonel Hammond has another servant deliver the message that he would like to see Phebe in the library after supper. Phebe goes to talk to Colonel Hammond, and then, she tells Rainbow that Colonel Hammond would like to talk to him about Lucky.

When Colonel Hammond speaks to Rainbow, he says that he has an idea about buying Lucky on speculation. He thinks that Lucky is worth the price Mrs. Blooman is currently asking but that he might worth more in the future. Earlier, Rainbow had confided in Phebe that, if he had the money, Rainbow would buy Lucky himself so he could get the job carrying mail. Phebe told Colonel Hammond about Rainbow’s wish, so Colonel Hammond proposes that he buy Lucky on Rainbow’s behalf, with the idea that Rainbow will pay him back later, with interest. That way, Rainbow can have the horse and get the job he wants right now, and the colonel will gain a profit on his investment later. Rainbow is concerned about his ability to repay the debt, and the colonel tells him that he can pay in installments after he has started earning money from his new job. Colonel Hammond believes that it’s a safe investment because he thinks that Rainbow is trustworthy and will repay the debt in time, and if he can’t, for some reason, Colonel Hammond would have the horse, which is a good horse. To further secure the deal, Colonel Hammond says that they should buy insurance for the horse, in case Lucky gets sick or killed in an accident.

Rainbow is thrilled with Colonel Hammond’s proposal, although he is so overwhelmed that he isn’t sure how to respond at first. Colonel Hammond says that he can take some time to think it over, and Rainbow decides to write a letter to Handie Level about the deal, to see if he thinks this is a good arrangement. Colonel Hammond says that’s fine, and since it will take a couple of days to get a reply to the letter, he would be willing to have Rainbow stay in his house until the reply comes. Colonel Hammond provides Rainbow with a written proposal of the agreement between them to study and to describe to Handie.

When Handie’s reply arrives, Handie advises Rainbow to accept the deal with Colonel Hammond. Handie has spoken to Trigget, and Trigget is still willing to offer Rainbow the job of carrying the mail. Rainbow tells Colonel Hammond that he has decided to accept his offer, and they complete the transaction. Since Rainbow still has a return pass to Southerton for the train, he decides to use it for himself and to use some of his remaining money to pay for Lucky to travel by train, which shortens their journey considerably and saves them money finding places to stay on the way.

The return trip to Southerton takes only hours by rail rather than days by the road. In Southerton, he gives Mrs. Blooman the money for Lucky, and the next day, he and Lucky leave for Rainbow’s home town. Once he gets there, he accepts the job from Trigget. The author/narrator tells us that Rainbow performs the job well, although there are difficulties along the way, which we get to hear about in the final installment of the series.

Overall, I liked the story. I was a little concerned for Lucky’s welfare along the way, even though I already knew that Rainbow was going to end up as his owner eventually because I already knew the general course of the series. I just wasn’t sure exactly how that would happen. I was relieved that nothing really bad happened to the horse along the way because I always get upset with stories where bad things happen to animals.

There is a theme in 19th century and early 20th century books that I call “Rich People to the Rescue.” Although themes of hard work and having a good character are prevalent during that period, and the Stories of Rainbow and Lucky have those themes as well, I’ve noticed that the reward that hard-working people often receive in these stories is that some rich person will recognize and reward their hard work and good character. This story follows that same pattern. I liked the part where Rainbow helps to expose the counterfeiter and the kind ticket seller at the train station rewards him with a free train ticket, but I did feel like Colonel Hammond arranging everything for Rainbow at the end was kind of sudden. Colonel Hammond is a wealthy man, and Mr. Miles says that he often makes speculative investments of that kind to promote people or causes he thinks might be worth it. Because Colonel Hammond has plenty of money, it’s a small risk for him to do this, although he is reasonably careful about securing his investment with well-defined terms and insurance. Framing Colonel Hammond’s generosity as a business arrangement rather than pure charity does make it seem a little more realistic to me than those stories where a rich person just automatically buys things for the deserving main characters unconditionally, and I think that’s what the author means when he has Mr. Miles say that what Colonel Hammond does to help people is better than simply giving people money. Colonel Hammond enables people to proceed with useful projects and ventures in a practical and realistic way.

Racism is a constant theme throughout this series because Rainbow is black. It’s a bold choice for a children’s series written on the eve of the American Civil War. However, I was somewhat surprised that there was less racism in this particular installment of the series than I expected. 

This is the first story in the series where Rainbow is traveling alone instead of under the protection of a white employer. I could see that would make him more vulnerable, and the story does say that young black men who leave home feel more uncertain and vulnerable because they don’t know what kind of reception they might receive from people they meet and they’re aware that it can be nasty. In the first book in the series, the lawyer from their home town even says that there are some places that won’t offer food or accommodation to a black person during their time, which is a difficulty when traveling. At first, I expected to see an example of this with Rainbow traveling alone. However, he is never turned away from taverns or inns where he rents rooms for the night, and he doesn’t seem to have any difficulty finding places to eat. He does meet with thieves and con men along the way, but they’re more general criminals, not targeting him specifically because of his race. There are some random people Rainbow meets on his journey who say rude or derogatory things to him, but that’s about it. Also, nobody has used the n-word since Mrs. Blooman did it in the previous book in the series. I’m just surprised that Rainbow didn’t encounter more problems of that kind or that he wasn’t refused service anywhere.

I’m trying to decide whether Rainbow’s difficulties with racism in the story are more low-key than I expected because that’s more in keeping with the usual daily experienced of the times or if it’s because the author decided to put more emphasis on Rainbow’s adventures with the criminals he encounters. I’m leaning toward the idea that the author wants to put the emphasis on the adventure part of the story and on how Rainbow’s hard work and good character are rewarded in the end. If nobody in his time and location refused service to a black person, the concept of that happening wouldn’t have been mentioned earlier in the series. 

The author, Jacob Abbott, likes showing the details of daily life in his time in his stories, and it’s interesting to read about Rainbow’s travels. In this story, we get to see Rainbow take his first train ride, during which we have an interesting observation about the way scenery appears to move thought the train window, and we also get a complaint about ladies with the habit of taking up extra train seats with their parcels and a lesson on why this is a form of theft. I get the feeling that the author has encountered this situation before, and it really annoys him, although he delivers his rebuke as diplomatically as he can.

We also get to see Rainbow eating in a city restaurant rather than the small town or countryside taverns where he has been before. I found the description of the restaurant interesting. It was one of the places where I though that Rainbow might be refused service at first, but he encounters no difficulties there. What particularly fascinated me about the restaurant is that all the food is pre-made and on display for people walking in to select what they want to eat. Foods that don’t need to be kept hot, like pies and sandwiches, are simply laid out on the counter, and hot dishes are kept behind the counter, warmed by “spirit lamps.” It seems almost like modern fast food, being kept warm under heating lamps. Rainbow just tells the restaurant staff what he wants from the foods he sees, and they give it to him. I see the benefits of this system because, especially in an era without microwaves to quickly warm up food, people can’t wait for dishes they just ordered to be cooked from scratch. Things need to be prepared when they come in. I just didn’t expect it to be so similar to the methods we use for modern fast food. I am a little concerned that the foods that are simply laid out on the counter, like sandwiches with cold meat in them are not being kept at a proper temperature, but it may not matter if they are not there for long because customers claim them pretty quickly.

Stories of Rainbow and Lucky: Rainbow’s Journey

Stories of Rainbow and Lucky

This is the second book in the Stories of Rainbow and Lucky series. I’ve covered the first book this series, and I have to do all five books in a row because the series is set up like a mini-series. That is, none of the books in the series can stand alone; they are all installments of one, longer story. It’s an unusual series from the mid-19th century, written on the eve of the American Civil War, by a white author with a young black hero. Rainbow is a teenage black boy who, in the previous installment of the story, is hired by a young carpenter who is just a few years older than he is to help him with a job in another town. The rest of the series follows the two young men, particularly Rainbow, through their adventures, learning life lessons, even dealing with difficult topics like racism. (Lucky is a horse, and Lucky enters the story later.) The story is unusual for this time period because it was uncommon for black people to be the heroes of books and for topics like racism to be discussed directly. It’s also important to point out that our black hero is not a slave, he is not enslaved at any point in the series, and the series has a happy ending for him. People don’t always treat him right, but he does have friends and allies, and he manages to deal with the adversity he faces and builds a future for himself. Keep in mind along the way that there are a lot of pun names in this series and that people’s names are often clues to their characters.

This book is easily available to read online in your browser through NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN CHILDREN & WHAT THEY READ, I’m going to do a detailed summary below. If you’d rather read it yourself before you read my review, you can go ahead, but some people might want to know what it’s like in more detail.

For most of the last story, the focus was on Handie, his family’s financial problems, the inheritance he receives from his uncle, and how the lawyer who is the executor of the estate arranges for Handie to use the estate to his best advantage. Because Handie is 19 years old, he is still considered a minor. (The legal age is 21 during this time period and would stay the legal age until about halfway through the 20th century.) His uncle’s will specifically stated that Handie cannot take full ownership of the farm that he left to him until he is 22 years old. Uncle that time, the lawyer, Mr. James, will manage the estate on his behalf, using the money provided with the estate to hire someone to fix up the farm to rent it out to a tenant until Handie is old enough to take it. The Level family’s money problems are because Handie’s father is not good at managing his money, and Handie’s uncle knew that if Handie’s father got his hands on his son’s estate, he would probably blow the money and end up having to sell the farm to cover his debts, leaving Handie with nothing.

In the previous book, Mr. James discusses the situation with Handie, and they work out another solution to the Levels’ debt problems. He helps Handie take steps to separate the money he earns from his father’s money, and he hires Handie as the carpenter to work on repairing the farm he inherited on behalf of his own estate. It’s a somewhat odd arrangement because Handie is effectively being hired to work for himself but will be paid by Mr. James on behalf of the estate. Under the circumstances, it’s the best system for solving the family’s money problems and setting Handie up for a better future. 

Because Handie will need a little help while he’s working on the farm, Mr. James also provides money from the estate so he can hire an assistant. Handie offers the job to 14-year-old Rainbow. Rainbow doesn’t have any carpentry experience, but he’s strong for his age and a good worker, and Handie would rather bring someone he knows with him rather than trying to find someone else when he arrives at this new town. At the end of the previous book, Handie offers Rainbow the job as a carpenter’s assistant and tells him that they will be living in the town of Southerton for about 2 or 3 months during the summer while they do the job. The job will involve hard, physical work, but Rainbow can handle it, and this job could give him some good work experience. Rainbow accepts the job offer, with his mother’s permission, and they begin preparing for the journey.

When this story begins, Handie and Rainbow are about to leave the village where they both live. It’s a summer evening with good weather, and they will be traveling by stage coach. When Handie offered Rainbow the job, he didn’t explain that the farm where they will be working actually belongs to him, but word of Handie’s inheritance has spread around town since. Rainbow is astonished at the idea of someone so young having a farm of his own, and he decides that he will ask Handie more about it later, although he knows he should be careful to be polite about asking because he doesn’t want to seem rude by prying. Although these boys are friendly with each other, having grown up in the same small town, they also have a professional relationship now, and Rainbow’s mother impressed on him that he needs to treat Handie respectfully as his employer. They are becoming young men and venturing out into the world for the first time, so they need to learn how to behave professionally with each other, as befits their new, professional relationship. Neither of the young men is experienced with traveling anywhere, and they’re both looking forward to this exciting journey.

Things seem to be going well at the start of the journey, but then, the stage coach driver, while chatting with Handie mentions that he doesn’t like the look of one of the passengers. At first, Rainbow worries that the driver is talking about him because he’s accustomed to people making comments about him, ridiculing him, or telling him that he isn’t welcome among them for being black. Even though they are from a small village, and many people there like Rainbow for his good nature and helpfulness, he’s already seen his share of discrimination. However, the driver is talking about someone else. He explains that there’s a man on the stage coach called Burkill, who is wearing a bright waistcoat. He’s met Burkill before, and he knows that the man is trouble. 

Right now, Handie and Rainbow are riding on the top of the stage with the driver, but when Burkill joined them, he made a fuss to the driver about whether or not Rainbow would be riding inside the coach, objecting to the idea of riding with a black person. The driver, Trigget, who knows Rainbow and doesn’t like Burkill anyway, told him that Rainbow has paid his fare and will ride wherever he wants to: “I don’t pay any attention to the different shades of complexion of my passengers … Rainbow is suitable company for any honest man. You can judge best whether he is suitable company for you or not, and act accordingly.” It’s a bit of a slam. He’s implying that, if Burkill can’t get along with Rainbow, he’s probably not an honest man, and the driver already has reason to think he’s not, so he’d better not make a big deal about it. The other passengers also know Burkill’s reputation, so they get the joke and laugh at Burkill. Embarrassed, Burkill just gets on the stage coach without saying anything else. All of this happens before Handie and Rainbow get on themselves, and they don’t hear any of it, so their choice to sit up with the driver was just by preference, not because they were required to sit there. Trigget just tells them about it later, as they ride along.

(Note: I’m using the term “black”, and so did Burkill when he was speaking, but the driver corrects him, using the word “colored” because “colored” is considered the more polite word at the time this story was written. I’ve explained before that “colored” and “Negro” used to be considered more polite terms prior to the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-20th century. At that point, “black” became the accepted generic word, where it had once been considered somewhat rude, and “African American” became the polite, formal term. I’ve been using “black” in the modern generic sense for the purpose of these reviews because I think the modern audience will find it easier to follow, but this series was meant to be educational for 19th century children, like the author’s other books, so there are points in the story where the characters actually discuss which racial terms are more polite. The general rule they establish is that the best thing to call someone is whatever they would like to be called, and I think it’s a pretty good, general rule. I’m just explaining because it’s a plot point, and the racial words that people use are clues to their characters. Characters who use the wrong racial words are either ignorant or antagonistic, and Burkill falls into the second category. We haven’t know him long, but we’ve already established that Burkill is disreputable and a trouble-maker, and he also uses the wrong racial words and has a racist attitude. Basically, he’s bad news all the way around, and this incident is establishing his character for readers and setting the scene for further misbehavior from him.)

The author of this series likes to include detailed information about daily life in his stories for educational purposes, which is a boon to modern people who like learning about the details of life in the past. Some of what he says might have once been common knowledge to 19th century people, but it’s really helpful for people studying history. In this case, we leave off the racial talk to talk about the trials and tribulations of travel in the mid-19th century. 

While they ride with Trigget, Trigget asks Handie about his journey to Southerton and the inheritance he’s heard about. Handie explains to him about the farm he’s inherited and his arrangements with the lawyer, so Rainbow gets the rest of that story without needing to ask. Trigget explains that the stagecoach needs to be in Southerton by 4 o’clock because there’s a train that leaves Southerton at that time. Some of his passengers will want to be on that train. However, he’s also carrying mail on the stagecoach, and it’s even more important for the mail to make it there on time than the human passengers. 

Handie asks if people shouldn’t be considered more important than letters, and Trigget explains, “the passengers go at their own risk. We get them through if we can, but if we can’t it is their misfortune. We don’t absolutely engage to get them through at such a time. But as to the mail, it is different. We contract with the government to deliver it, without fail, at four o’clock at the station, and if we don’t do it we have a heavy fine to pay.” In other words, there are laws and consequences to guarantee that the mail gets to its destination on time, but nobody’s imposing consequences for delivering people safely to their destination, so the people just have to look out for themselves. That sounds worrying, but Trigget further explains that he can’t wait for people who just have to finish the story they’re telling at a stagecoach stop. The coach has to leave each stop at a specific time to make it to its destination on time for the sake of the mail, so the passengers need to make sure that they’re ready to go, or they’ll be left behind. It’s not much different from missing a bus, a train, or a plane today.

When Trigget says that they will reach Southerton at four o’clock, he means four o’clock in the morning. They set out in the evening, and this stagecoach travels all night. As they pass through the countryside and towns along the way, they notice that lights in houses start going out around 10 o’clock, the usual time for people in the countryside to go to bed, although the author notes that lights in the towns stay on for longer because people stay up later there.

Along the way, they stop at the post offices in various small towns and villages to sort the mail. The post offices are sometimes in buildings by themselves, but in some places, they’re located inside another business, like a store or a tavern. At each stop, they have to leave behind the mail for that particular area. At one point, they change horses on the coach, and Rainbow says that he might want a job like that someday, caring for horses. Each stop only takes a few minutes, but Trigget tries to keep things moving quickly so they can be at the next stop on time. He plans for an extra hour on his journey in case anything goes wrong, and they are about to need that extra time.

After the coach is moving again, Trigget suddenly realizes that the boy who harnessed the horses has accidentally left the reins on the right sides of the horses’ mouths unbuckled on the lead horses. It’s serious mistake because, when Trigget pulls on the reins, he’s pulling the lead horses off to the left instead of evenly on both sides, causing the entire team and coach to turn. When he tries to stop the horses from moving, he loses control of them, and they’re coming to a place where a dangerous turn could wreck the coach!

In desperation, Rainbow decides to try a dangerous stunt. He climbs out over the backs of the moving horses to reach the lead horses to fix the problem with the reins. At first, the horses are nervous with Rainbow climbing on them, but Rainbow is good with horses and manages to calm them. Unfortunately, he doesn’t manage to get the reins completely fixed before disaster strikes. They hit the turn that Trigget feared, and the coach overturns!

Fortunately, Rainbow manages to escape injury. He swings down from the horse he’s riding and manages to calm the horses down. The horses are uninjured, but the coach is on its side, and the passengers are in a panic! Trigget and Handie are also unhurt, and they begin helping the other passengers out of the overturned coach and assessing them for injuries. One of the young women who was in the coach is unconscious. The other passengers fear that she may be hurt very badly and will need a doctor, but Trigget thinks that she has only fainted from the shock. The axle-tree of the coach is broken, so they can’t merely right the coach and continue traveling. Trigget asks Rainbow to take one of the horses and ride back to the last stop and get some help and a wagon to pick up the mail and baggage from the coach. Trigget’s first concern, as he said before, is to keep the mail moving. Once someone comes to take the mail bags on, he turns his attention back to his passengers.

The unconscious girl revives, and she is not badly injured. When Rainbow returns with another wagon, they load all the luggage on it, and the entire party returns to the last tavern they passed, where they stay for the rest of the night. The owner’s wife, Mrs. Norton, gives the young women a room upstairs, but she doesn’t have enough unoccupied rooms for everyone. She suggests that Rainbow stay in the barn with the man who manages the horses, and Handie says that he’ll stay there with Rainbow, too. Mrs. Norton is grateful that they’re willing to take this lesser accommodation, and she gives them both sheets and blankets to use. The man who manages the horses, Hitover, offers his bed to Handie, and he says that Rainbow can use his assistant’s bed because the assistant, Jex, is the one who is currently taking the mail to its next stop. However, the boys decide that they would prefer to sleep on the hay with their sheets and blankets. Handie shows Rainbow how to shape the hay into a more comfortable bed, rolling up some to make pillows. (I thought that part was interesting because I’ve read about people sleeping on hay in other books, but I think this is the first story I’ve read that explains how to make an improvised bed in hay.) Then, they say their prayers and go to sleep.

Rainbow has a more difficult time going to sleep than Handie does, thinking about everything that’s happened and how strange it feels to be away from home. Both of the boys are becoming young men and venturing out into the world without their families for the first time, but in some ways, Rainbow’s position feels more precarious than Handie’s because he never knows how the people he meets might react to him, just because of his race. The book says:

Besides, the going away from home of a colored boy like Rainbow is a much more momentous event for him than such a change is for a white boy. A white boy, if he is of an amiable disposition and behaves well, even if he goes among entire strangers, soon makes plenty of friends. The world is prepared every where to welcome him, and to receive him kindly. But a boy like Rainbow feels that his fate is to be every where disliked and shunned. In every strange town that he enters he expects that the boys, instead of welcoming him as a new companion and playmate, will be ready to deride him, and to point at him, and to call him opprobrious names; so that, when he goes out into the world, there is no bright side of the picture to relieve the regret which he feels at leaving his home. He expects, wherever he goes, and however bright and beautiful may be the outward aspects of the novel scenes through which he may pass, that every thing human will look dark and scowling upon him, and that all who have loved him, or will love him, or care any thing about him, are left behind.

The one point of reassurance for Rainbow is Handie. Handie is kind to him, and he’s also Rainbow’s link to what’s safe and familiar to him. When he falls asleep, Rainbow dreams that he’s riding a wild horse. 

At one point during the night, Rainbow wakes up and sees Burkill sneaking around. Burkill hides a carpet bag under some hay, not seeing that Rainbow is awake and watching. Rainbow tells himself that he’ll have to mention it to Handie, and he goes back to sleep.

The next day, Handie goes to see about breakfast, and Rainbow gives Hitover some help with the horses. While Rainbow is helping with the horses, Burkill comes to the barn again, and he starts hassling Hitover about getting him a horse and wagon so he can get to Southerton faster. Hitover says that Burkill has been giving him a lot of trouble about that since the coach party arrived after the accident, but he keeps telling Burkill that he can’t help him. They only have one wagon, and Trigget will probably need it for handling his passengers and their baggage. When Trigget returns after getting the broken stage coach to a blacksmith, he says the same thing. Burkill tries to persuade him to forget about the other passengers because he’s willing to pay more, but Trigget says that he has a duty to all the passengers. Out of curiosity, Rainbow looks under the hay and sees that the carpet bag is still hidden there.

When Rainbow next speaks to Handie, Handie tells him that everyone’s bags and trunks will have to be searched because some things have been stolen. Handie’s pretty sure that he knows who will be most reluctant to have his bags searched, but he doesn’t say so aloud. (I think we all know at this point who the thief probably is.) While the search is being conducted, Rainbow quietly tells Trigget about Burkill’s hidden carpet bag. Trigget tells him not to say anything to anyone else yet. 

Instead, while Burkill is pressing him again about getting the wagon and leaving, Trigget says that he needs to get John Easterly and Handie to come to the barn with him first to talk about some hay he wants to buy. Burkill, worried about the possible discovery of the bag, goes with them without being invited. Trigget asks Rainbow to move some of the hay with a pitchfork, and Burkill tries to distract them from looking in the spot where the bag is hidden. When Rainbow uncovers the bag, Burkill admits that the bag is his and claims that he put it there to keep it from being lost. He tries to keep everyone from examining the bag, but Trigget says that, if he doesn’t show them what he has in the bag, they’ll all assume that he has the stolen goods, and they’ll fetch an officer to search the bag. For a moment, Burkill pretends that he’s lost the key to the bag, but Trigget finds it and opens the bag. Burkill does have John Easterly’s stolen watch in his bag, and he tries to claim that he just happened to find it and didn’t know who it belonged to, but nobody believes him. They fetch an officer, and Burkill is arrested. They can’t find the money that was taken from the young women on the coach, but everyone assumes that Burkill took that, too. Since the girls lost their money, Handie offers to lend the girls some money so they can continue their journey, and they accept.

Trigget says that he’s having the coach repaired, and any of the men (except for the arrested Burkill) who wants to wait for it can go with him that night. He is arranging for the girls to continue on immediately in the wagon, but if the men don’t want to wait for the coach, he will refund part of their coach fare, and they can make their own travel arrangements. Trigget says that they can continue to Southerton on foot, if they wish, and he’ll bring their baggage later, so Handie decides that’s what he and Rainbow will do. They’re about 20 miles away from Southerton at this point, and Handie says they can walk the distance and get there by five o’clock, maybe around seven o’clock in the evening, if they stop for a couple of hours on the way. That means that they will still get there faster than if they waited for the coach to be fixed. They remove a few things from their bags that they will need until Trigget can bring them their luggage in Southerton. Then, they set off on their way.

While they walk, they pass the place where the coach was wrecked. They look around to see if maybe the girls’ wallet with their money fell out somewhere. They don’t find it, and they consider going by the blacksmith’s shop to see if it’s still in the coach. The problem is that, when they come to a crossroads, they realize that Southerton is one way, and the blacksmith’s shop is another. They have to decide if they’re willing to go out of their way to visit the blacksmith and see if the girls’ wallet is in the coach. Handie doesn’t want to delay their journey too much because he doesn’t have much money. He gave what he could spare to the girls, and a delay in the journey would cause them to have to spend more money for food or accommodation. However, he feels like they ought to try looking for the purse anyway because he wants to feel like he did all he could for the unfortunate girls.

At the blacksmith’s shop, the blacksmith gives them permission to search the coach for the wallet. It doesn’t take them long to find it. When they do, Rainbow says that they ought to check if the money is there and maybe take what they need to pay themselves back what Handie lent to the girls, but Handie doesn’t think it’s right to look in the wallet without the girls’ permission. He thinks that it would be only right to deliver it to the girls intact. In fact, after he thinks about it, he decides that he should show it to the blacksmith, since the coach was in his custody, and that he will also seal it up for security. (The narrator says at this point that he’s not sure himself whether Handie is being truly right in this level of scrupulousness or just being overly particular. Rainbow thought this was going too far, but he didn’t want to say so. The narrator invites child readers who are unsure about the right thing to do in such a circumstance to discuss it with their parents or a trustworthy adult, which sounds like the advice that teachers typically gave us in school when I was a kid and anything came up on which they didn’t want to render an opinion or didn’t think it was their place to discuss.)

Handie shows the wallet to the blacksmith, and they discuss the proper way to handle it. The blacksmith says, in a way, he wishes that Handie hadn’t found the wallet because it does create an ethical quandary about which of them is the best person to handle it, since it doesn’t really belong to any of them, and he doesn’t want there to be any question about whether he might have taken any money from it himself, since it was in his possession. Handie suggests that they wrap the wallet up in paper and seal it, and he’ll write on the outside that they found it but didn’t open it and that they all sealed it up together. Then, the blacksmith can give it to Trigget when Trigget comes for the coach, and Trigget can deliver it to the girls. The blacksmith is satisfied with this arrangement.

After they’ve resolved that matter, Handie and Rainbow talk about how Trigget was wrong that Burkill stole the money, and Handie says, “And it shows us that we ought to be pretty careful how we judge and condemn people, even when we know that their characters are bad.” (I also took the lesson from it that a person like Burkill has made the kind of reputation for himself where nobody believes him on those rare occasions when he is telling the truth, so it’s also his fault when people don’t believe him. I mean, it’s hard to convincingly argue that you haven’t stolen something when people have already caught you with a different thing you just stole, lied about, and tried to conceal in the same 24 hour period, but that’s not where the story puts its emphasis.)

They continue on with their journey, and when they come to the next tavern, Handie decides to see if they will give them dinner in exchange for work instead of money, so he can save the money they still have. The tavern owner, Mr. Dorling, is a little “slack”, as one of his neighbors puts it. He’s not very on top of things, but his daughter, Margery, minds the business, and she can think of some things for Handie to fix around the place. Margery is very pleased with their help and considers that they have paid for their dinner many times over. Handie thinks that they probably still owe some money for dinner, so he asks Margery’s father what he thinks is fair. At first, it seems like Margery’s father still insists on them paying for most of the cost of their meals, which doesn’t seem fair, but then, they realize that they’ve misunderstood what he said. Mr. Dorling means that he will give them not only the promised meals but almost enough to buy two more meals for themselves. In other words, he’s the one who owes them more money, not the other way around. In fact, they’ve done such good work that Margery proposes that Handie and Rainbow stay the rest of the afternoon. There is more work to do, they can have their evening meals at the tavern, and Margery will also arrange for a wagon to take them to Southerton so they will arrive there at about the time they had planned. Handie accepts the offer, and they continue their work.

The boy who will be taking them to Southerton in a wagon, Tolie, says that he can drive them when he’s done bringing the cows in from the pasture, and they can go sooner, if Rainbow will help him finish the task. Rainbow and Tolie go out to the pasture together, and while they’re out there, they decide that they both want some lilies from the pond. Rainbow often helped younger children from his village get pond lilies and a couple of them have asked him to send some lilies from his journey, so he’s happy to help Tolie. When they collect the lilies, Tolie says he doesn’t see how Rainbow can send lilies back to his town without them wilting on the way. Rainbow does his best to get lilies with their roots intact, and he asks Handie if he can think of a way to send them home undamaged. Handie thinks about it, and he remembers that there’s an empty paint keg in the shed that the Dorlings probably don’t want anymore. He says they can ask the Dorlings if they can have it, and then, Trigget can pick up the lilies and carry them home when he passes this way again. Margery says it’s fine for them to have the paint keg, and she’ll make sure that Trigget picks up the lilies. Trigget is happy to do Rainbow the favor of delivering the lilies because Rainbow was so helpful during and after the coach accident.

Tolie is a little later in leaving with Handie and Rainbow than they originally agreed, and Handie talks to him about the importance of punctuality, telling him a little story about some boys trying for a job and how the one who planned ahead against accidents making him late was the one who got the job. They discuss the story a little, and then, Handie asks Tolie some questions about Southerton and what he knows about the Three Pines farm. Tolie says that Southerton is a small town but pretty nice. He is familiar with the Three Pines farm because boys in the area like to go fishing in a stream nearby. The Three Pines farm used to be very nice, but it has become run down. It was originally established by a man name Captain Stanfield, an early settler in the area. There really are three pine trees on the farm. Tolie says that Captain Stanfield deliberately left the three pine trees there when he cleared the land for planting, and there’s supposed to be a story about why he did that, but Tolie doesn’t know what the full story is.

Handie’s plan, on arriving in Southerton, is to get a room for himself and Rainbow at the local tavern. He only plans to stay at the tavern for a day or two, while he and Rainbow check out the farm, see what condition the buildings are in, and arrange a place for them to sleep there while they’re repairing the farm. Handie doesn’t expect to find furniture at the farm, so they stop at a farm on the way and buy some straw that they can use to make beds at the farm, if they can’t find anything else.

This volume of the story ends at this point, mentioning that Handie and Rainbow had other adventures in Southerton before they finally settle at the farm house and make beds for themselves from the straw they bought. The story promises that it will explain what happened in the next volume. It also explains that, when Trigget comes to bring them their luggage, he also brings them the girls’ wallet they found and turns it over to Handie to return to the girls, telling him to write to them about it. When he does, the girls tell him to take the money from the purse to pay himself back what he loaned them (so he might as well have done that in the first place). They say that he can mail the wallet to them, but instead, he arranges to send them the remaining money and purchases the wallet from them, with their permission. He finds a piece of poetry in the wallet along with the money and tries to ask the girls which of them actually owned the wallet, but they refuse to say. Handie keeps the poem as a keepsake.

Meanwhile, Burkill goes to trial for his theft of the watch, and Rainbow is called as a witness in court. We do not get to see the trial in the story, but we are told that Burkill is found guilty and sent to prison, and the rest of the story has to wait for the next installment in the series.

I liked this installment of the series better than the last one because it had more action to it! The last installment established the reasons for this journey and how Handie came to hire Rainbow as his assistant, but much of it focused on the money problems in the Level family and Handie’s negotiations with the lawyer handling their affairs. In this part of the series, we see Handie and Rainbow setting off on their journey by stage coach! We get to see them riding on top of a stage coach, a daring stunt by Rainbow to try to prevent an accident, and the aftermath of the accident when he isn’t successful. Everyone gives Rainbow credit for risking his neck to try to save the situation, and nobody regards it as his fault when the accident happened anyway. He didn’t do anything to cause it, and he was brave to try to save everyone. Fortunately, there were no fatalities or serious injuries from the accident, so it’s exciting without anyone having to feel scared or too sad about the outcome. 

Then, we also have a theft among the stage coach travelers. It’s not much of a mystery who committed it because we have one very definite shady character in the group, and Rainbow sees that person doing something suspicious, which gives it all away. For a while, I was afraid that someone would blame Rainbow for the theft or that our suspicious character might try to claim that the bag he was hiding actually belonged to Rainbow. I half expected it because parts of this series focus on racial issues, so I could see why some characters might be tempted to try to use Rainbow as a scapegoat. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen. It might not have worked even if someone tried because everyone knows who owned which bags because they were loaded on the stage coach in front of everyone, and both Handie and the driver know Rainbow, but I was glad to avoid the stress of a false accusation. Instead, the other characters believe what Rainbow saw, and the real thief is caught with the stolen goods, and we are told that Rainbow is later called as a witness against him in court. There is a definite point where racism enters the story, specifically from the suspicious character, but I want to talk more about racial issues below.

Even the parts of the story that are more educational were pretty interesting. As I said, the author liked to describe parts of daily life and how things work for the education of his young readers, and this is very helpful to people in the 21st century as information about how people lived and worked in the 19th century. In this installment, we really get a look at Handie’s work skills for the first time when he does some work at a tavern to pay for their food. We see him mending a broken door, a window, and a leak in a roof, and before that, we also see him fixing the tavern owner’s tools because they haven’t been well-maintained and Handie’s tools are with the rest of his luggage, waiting to be taken to the next town. The details of Handie’s work are minor details in the narrative, but they’re interesting for people with a fascinating for DIY skills.

When you’re reading the parts about racism and the people who stand up for Rainbow or correct the way that other people talk about black people, I’d like to remind you again that this book was written in the late 1850s. This book is pre-Civil War, not just in its setting, but when it was actually created. It was written about 100 years before the Civil Rights Movement. The author of this book, Jacob Abbott, did not live to see the Civil Rights Movement and never heard the term “woke” in its 21st usage or about Black Lives Matter, with all the emotional baggage those carry.

However, like many 19th-century children’s authors, he was very concerned with children’s education. He specifically wrote children’s books for educational purposes, not just pure entertainment. In his books, he explains to children how the world works around from, from the details about travel and mail delivery to the notes about when people habitually go to bed in the countryside vs. the towns to the ways people look at black people, speak about them, and treat them. These things are all parts of the world his child audiences were growing up in, and he wrote about them both to explain what children were seeing around themselves and also to teach the children some lessons about how he and others wanted them to behave and respond to situations they might encounter. Along with the lessons about the importance of hard work, money management, and prudent living (the main focus of the first installment in this series), there are lessons about the polite ways to address black people, how to treat them, and how to respond to someone who isn’t speaking or behaving well. The language that the author uses as polite racial terms isn’t what we would expect in the 21st century, as I explained above, because he didn’t see some of the cultural shifts that inspired the change in the terms that people use. For his time, “colored” and “Negro” were among the more polite words, and the generic “black” we use today was discouraged. However, I think his attitude that it’s best to call people what they want to be called or what they call themselves is generally in keeping with modern principles.

One of the reasons why I want to emphasize that this story, and its author, are from the 1850s, pre-Civil War, is to make sure that readers keep historical events and attitudes in perspective and in their proper order. People like Jacob Abbott existed before the Civil War. He wasn’t the only one who believed in principles of treating other people, including people of different races, with politeness and consideration. There were always people like that. They may not have always said it or shown it in precisely the same way, but there were people with similar attitudes and similar principles in Abbott’s time and even before that. They were there every step of the way, and it matters that they were because none of what happened next would have happened without them, and we wouldn’t be where we are today without their influence behind us. 

When I said that his principles are generally in keeping with modern principles, I’m not saying that Abbott was a man ahead of his time. The point that I’m really trying to make was that he was very much a man of his time. The Civil War was looming, tensions about slavery and treatment of black people had been building for some time, the country was sharply fractured, it was discussed openly, hostilities had already taken place, and people could see the war coming. This was the atmosphere in which Abbott was writing for children, and that’s why I find it intriguing that he was writing about racial issues. He is writing not to prepare the children for the coming war but for the little, everyday battles of their lives, for the times when they will live and work alongside people of different races and must learn to get along together. It matters because the man who fusses about where the black boy will sit on the stage coach aren’t that much different from the 1950s/1960s issues about who would sit where on a bus. When the stage coach driver says that Rainbow has paid his fare and can sit where he wants, he’s not that much different from people who defied segregation in restaurants by saying that one paying customer’s money is just as green as another’s, and that’s the color that matters. Different day, but same issues. 

The people who stood up against segregation and racism were partly fueled by other people who came before them, people like Abbott and books and magazines with themes like the ones in this story. The children who read this story were children during the Civil War. Their children lived during the second half of the 19th century, through increasing westward expansion and industrialization. Their grandchildren lived through the Jim Crow eras and segregated schools, seeing the popularity of Birth of a Nation in 1915 and the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1910s and 1920s. Their great-grandchildren and great-great grandchildren would have been alive around the time of the Civil Rights Movement and the end of segregation, but what may have helped determine how they felt about all of these issues and how they felt about them in their daily lives was how their families felt about these things for all the generations leading up to those points when situations came to a head and whether they passed on those principles, generation after generation. Those children who read stories like this, absorbed the lessons, and believed in the principles probably also passed on those attitudes, even if they didn’t give their kids the same books to read. 

The Rainbow and Lucky Series isn’t well-known today, but I think it’s just one of those little pieces of the bigger puzzle. It’s the little things that add up to bigger ones later on. Even if later generations of the family didn’t read the same books, they might have been told by parents and grandparents not to call people impolite names or things they don’t like to be called. They might have been taught that people who are behaving themselves and paying good money for services should receive good service in return, no matter what they look like. There were white people who were against slavery long before the Civil War, there were white people who were supportive of the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-20th century, and there are still people in the 21st century who are determined to do what they can to help people suffering from forms of discrimination. Stories come and go, but the lessons we learn along the way and see our families and friends acting out in small, daily ways can stay not just for one lifetime, but the ones that follow. Major changes don’t happen overnight, and it can take generations for them to build, but it’s all the steps and all the people along the way who get us there and keep us moving forward. What I’d like people to remember is that this children’s series is one of those steps. You may not remember every step on the staircase as you go up, but each one gets you a little further up than you were before.

Stories of Rainbow and Lucky: Handie

Stories of Rainbow and Lucky

I’ve been wanting to cover this series for some time. It’s an unusual series from the mid-19th century, written on the eve of the American Civil War, by a white author with a young black hero. Rainbow is a teenage black boy who, in this first installment of the series, is hired by a young carpenter, who is only a few years older than he is, to help him with a job in another town. The entire series is really one long story, like a mini-series, and each book is an installment in the story. 

This first book focuses mostly on the young, white carpenter Handie Level, why he needs to take this job in another town, and why he decides to hire Rainbow to come with him. The rest of the series follows the two young men, particularly Rainbow, through their adventures, learning life lessons, even dealing with difficult topics like racism. (Lucky is a horse, and Lucky enters the story later.) It’s unusual for this time period for black people to be the heroes of books and for topics like racism to be discussed directly. It’s also important to point out that our black hero is not a slave, he is not enslaved at any point in the series, and the series has a happy ending for him. People don’t always treat him right, but he does have friends and allies, and he manages to deal with the adversity he faces and builds a future for himself.

I want to explain a little more about the background of this book, but it helps to know a couple of things before you begin. First, the author was a minister who had written other books and series for children, Jacob Abbott. He had a strong interest in human nature and the details of everyday life, so his books are interesting for students of history. He explains some of the details of 19th century life that other people of his time might have taken for granted, and he also liked to explain the reasons why his characters behave as they do in the stories, exploring their personalities and motivations. Second, as part of the author’s character studies and also just for the fun of it, he made many of his character names puns that offer hints to the characters’ roles or personalities, so keep an eye out for that when new characters are introduced. Some of these pun name or nicknames are obvious, but others require a little explanation. Rainbow’s employer, Handie Level, is a level-headed carpenter who’s good with his hands, so the meaning of his name is pretty straight-forward. “Rainbow” is the nickname of our black hero, not his real name. We are never told what his real name is. He apparently has one, but even the author/narrator of the story admits that he’s not sure what it is. He is nicknamed “Rainbow” because he is “colored”, and that may require a little explanation.

During the course of the books, the author explains that “colored” was one of the more polite words used for African Americans during the mid-19th century. The author wanted to make his stories educational for children of his time, so there are points when characters discuss how to address African Americans politely, explaining which terms are acceptable and which are not acceptable. The basic rule that the author establishes of not referring to anybody by a name you think they wouldn’t want to be called still holds true today, no matter who you’re talking about. It’s important to consider other people’s feelings in how you describe them, and it’s good to teach children to notice and care about other people’s feelings. However, some of the polite racial terms the author recommends in the books sound out-of-date to people today and might leave modern readers wondering if they really are polite. The answer to the question is that they were considered polite at the time the book was written, but since then, some of the conventions regarding polite racial terms have changed.

A major shift in the terms used took place during the Civil Rights Movement, around 100 years after this series was written. People were intentionally trying to distance themselves from the emotional baggage associated with the racial terms that had been used previously, so instead of using “Negro” and “colored”, they began using “African American” as the formal term and “black” as the generic, informal term. This change in terms was meant to help create a sense of a fresh start at a time when cultural attitudes were changing. Because this book was written in the 19th century, the terms they use as the polite terms are the ones that were formerly used as the polite terms before that cultural shift. Even though most people wouldn’t speak like that anymore, you can still see the use of these terms occasionally, particularly in the names of organizations that were created prior to the shift in racial terms, like the United Negro College Fund (UNCF, founded 1944) and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP, founded 1909). So, yes, “Rainbow” is a pun nickname because he is “colored” in the sense of the racial term. Apparently, the author was amused that the term made it sound like he was colorful, like a rainbow, although I think he is also a colorful personality.

The way a person speaks does offer hints to their background and character. Jacob Abbott had a fascination for analyzing the details of human behavior and the ways other people react to the other people around them them. He was aware of what was considered polite in his time and how the words people use affect other people. In these stories, he deliberately offers teachable moments to show child readers the differences between people who behave politely and considerately and the people who do not. As you go through the stories, feel free to study the characters and their behavior. The author meant for people to notice who these people are and why they do the things they do.

This book is easily available to read online in your browser through NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICAN CHILDREN & WHAT THEY READ, I’m going to do a detailed summary below. If you’d rather read it yourself before you read my review, you can go ahead, but some people might want to know in detail what they’d be getting into. There’s nothing here that I think would be racially offensive because it’s quite a gentle, sympathetic story. However, I can immediately see a couple of reasons why this book and its series hasn’t become a better-known children’s classic. 

I wasn’t kidding when I said that the author goes into detail about some aspects of daily life and society in the 19th century. This story and its series, like others by the author, was meant to be education, so there’s a lot of teaching going on, both in the form of moral advice and general life lessons and in the specifics about how to handle money and negotiate business arrangements. It could still be interesting for someone studying daily life and social attitudes in the 19th century, but 21st century children might find it a bit dull. There’s more explanation than there is action and adventure, although I wasn’t bored while reading it, and there are a few interludes with character backstories, stories that the characters tell each other, and a strange dream Handie has. In the middle of the book, there’s kind of a touching story about a little boy and his widowed mother that I enjoyed, and it explains some of the reasons why the characters are in the situation they’re in.

Handie and Rainbow are the two main characters of the series, although most of this book focuses on Handie and his family. Their money troubles, an inheritance that Handie receives, and the arrangements that he makes on behalf of his family create the situation that causes Handie to hire Rainbow to help him with some work, which requires traveling to another town to manage his inheritance. The entire series tells the story of why they’re doing this, what happens to them on the journey to this new town, what they find there, and what it means for their futures, but it’s told in five installments. There are some spoilers at the end of this story to future stories in the series, which ruins some of the suspense, but this isn’t really meant as a suspense story. It’s a story about a couple of promising boys in the teenage years and what they do that sets them up for their future. One of them just happens to be black, and that’s something that figures more in the later stories in the series. This particular book has a few moments when the characters discuss race and the difficulties and discrimination that black people encounter in life, but it’s not a major focus. There is going to be outright racism in the stories, but this book mostly sets up the backstory of the characters and their situation.

Handie Level (his first name is short for Handerson, we are later told) is a poor boy who is reluctant to go to school because his clothes are so poor, but yet, he is eager to learn. Our narrator, an unnamed neighbor of the Level family, describes how Mr. Level has difficulty earning much money because he is not very strong and is physically deformed. He manages to earn sufficient money to keep himself, his wife, and their son in a basic way as a kind of repair man. He is very good at fixing things in his little workshop. However, he isn’t very good at managing the little money he has, and his wife isn’t very attentive about maintaining the house or the family’s clothes, making them look more poor than they actually are. It’s true that they don’t have much, but they could do better if they managed their resources better. It’s partly because they feel sorry for their poor state and not very hopeful about it improving that keeps them from striving to do better. In reality, they’re not that much worse off than their neighbors, but this feeling that they are is what keeps Handie from going to school and letting others see his poor state. Since he has not been to school so far and can’t read, Handie worries that he would be embarrassingly behind the other children if he tried to go.

One day, the kind neighbor/narrator sees Handie trying to teach himself to read. Wanting to help the boy, the kind neighbor gives him a book that will help him learn to read better than what he was trying to use. (The author of the story is probably inserting himself here as the friendly neighbor, especially because he also wrote other books about children’s education, children’s readers, and series of simple stories aimed at teaching children to read.) Handie is grateful and begins making more progress in his learning.

Handie also becomes more helpful to his parents as he grows older and takes an interest in learning to mend his own clothes. When his mother helps him to mend his clothes, he looks much better, and Handie praises his sewing ability. His mother is pleased at the praise, and we learn that her husband has been more in the habit of criticizing her efforts at everything rather than praising her. This constant criticism and lack of encouragement is another reason why she has not been trying harder to maintain the household and the appearances of her family. Handie’s praise encourages his mother, and with Handie’s help, she begins making more effort around the house and doing more mending. With his clothes looking nicer and his new ability to read, Handie feels more comfortable going to school, and he begins progressing in life.

As Handie grows up, he becomes more and more helpful to his parents, both around the house and in his father’s repair business. He begins taking jobs of his own and bringing in a little money. He helps his family improve their circumstances. Then, a new opportunity comes along. The man at the mill says that if Handie or his father can buy a horse and wagon, he would pay them good money to haul lumber for him. It’s a tempting offer, and it could be a job that Handie’s father could do that would pay him more than what he’s doing now, but Handie doesn’t know where they would get the money for the horse and wagon for either of them to use. Handie has been good about saving money from what he earns, but the amount they would need is a large sum.

When Handie finally talks to his father about the job offer, Mr. Level is upset. He has been very worried lately, and he reveals to Handie the reason why. Even though they own their house, there is a mortgage on it, and the mortgage holder (a lawyer in the village) is now insisting that the Levels pay him the full sum or the family will be turned out. Mr. Level doesn’t know where he will get the money to pay the full amount, and he doesn’t know where they can possibly live if they have to leave. Handie and his mother had no idea that Mr. Level had taken out a mortgage on the house, and they are distressed about the looming threat of eviction. The amount of money they would need to save their house is about the same as what it would take to buy a horse and wagon.

While the Levels are debating about what they can do, the story flashes back a few years to a little boy named Solomon Roundly and the reason why Mr. Level is in such financial trouble. Solomon belongs to an industrious but poor family on the other side of the village from the Level family. The family is saving up to buy their own farm when Solomon’s father suddenly dies of an illness. The neighbors do their best to comfort Mrs. Roundly and young Solomon. Among the neighbors, there is a black lady and her 12-year-old son, who sometimes looks after young Solomon and plays with him or takes him fishing. (The book uses the term “colored” to describe the black boy and his mother because that was one of the more polite terms at the time. There is a point later in the series where the narrator specifically explains this.) The narrator says that he doesn’t remember the black boy’s real name because everyone has called him Rainbow for as long as anyone can remember, and they’re not even very certain whether he ever had another name.

One day, another local boy, called Josey Cameron, is accidentally injured when he tries to throw a stone into an apple tree to knock down an apple, and the stone comes back at him and hits him just above his eye. The boy cries with fright and pain, and Mrs. Roundly takes him inside and tends to the wound. Mrs. Roundly asks young Solomon to fetch Rainbow and see if Rainbow can take the injured boy home in his cart. Rainbow agrees to take Josey home, and Mrs. Roundly tells him to be sure to drop the boy off close to his house but not right in front of it and to let him walk the rest of the way so that his mother will see that he is not hurt too badly. If Mrs. Cameron sees them drop off her son right at the door, she might panic, thinking that he couldn’t walk at all. The reason why this little incident matters is that it happens shortly before Mr. Roundly dies, and it starts off a chain of events which explains Mr. Level’s mortgage.

Mr. Cameron is so grateful for Mrs. Roundly tending to his son’s wound and arranging for his ride home that he arranges a little present for the Roundly family. He is a daguerreotypist, meaning that he makes daguerreotypes, which is an early form of photography. Basically, he has a photography studio. He has Mr. Roundly pose for a daguerreotype as a reward to his family for their help. Mrs. Roundly is happy to see the picture of her husband when they receive it, but later, after her husband’s death, she finds it a painful reminder of the loss. Young Solomon, seeing his mother crying over the daguerreotype of his father, decides that if it makes her so unhappy to see it, maybe he should get rid of it.

Solomon takes the daguerreotype and goes to see Rainbow and asks him for a ride into the village. Rainbow is happy to give him a ride, but he asks him why he wants to go there. Solomon says he’s going there “on business”, which makes Rainbow laugh because Solomon is so little. Yet, Solomon insists that’s the case and tells Rainbow he’ll see it’s true when they get there. 

On the way, Solomon insists that Rainbow tell him a story. Rainbow tells him the only one that he knows, a story about a man who killed a bear. (I find hunting stories rather gruesome, although I suppose 19th century children might have found this interlude thrilling.) Rainbow knows this story because his mother read it in an almanac once. Solomon asks Rainbow if he can read. Rainbow says he can’t read very well. His mother is too busy working to teach him, and it’s hard to learn on his own. He wishes he could go to school, but he says that the local people don’t like him to go. The other boys don’t want to sit near him, and people make trouble for him. Solomon wishes he could do something that would help, but he can’t think of anything.

In the village, Solomon asks Rainbow to take him to Mr. Cameron’s. When they get there, Solomon asks Mr. Cameron to make a daguerreotype of him, just like he did with his father and to replace his father’s daguerreotype in its case with his instead. Mr. Cameron is surprised at the request, especially since Solomon admits that his mother didn’t send him and he wants the picture for free, but he agrees to do it as a favor to the little boy. When Mr. Cameron makes the daguerreotype, Rainbow is standing behind Solomon, and he ends up in the picture as well. When Solomon sees it, he says that he didn’t mean Rainbow to be in the picture with him, but Mr. Cameron says that he doesn’t see a problem with it. In fact, he thinks that Rainbow’s presence really improves the picture and makes it “prettier.” Rainbow is surprised and flattered that Mr. Cameron, as a man of artistic sensibilities, thinks his face could make a picture more beautiful, and Solomon decides that the picture will serve his purpose as well with Rainbow in it. 

When he gets home, Solomon puts his new daguerreotype in the place where his mother kept his father’s picture, and he puts his father’s picture away for safe-keeping. In the morning, his mother asks him about the new daguerreotype, and Solomon explains what he did. He says that he did it so that his mother would think of him now, and not his father, so she would be less sad. His mother agrees that’s a good thing to do, and she says that she doesn’t mind having Rainbow in the picture, either, because Rainbow has been so kind to Solomon.

Taking her son’s words to heart, Mrs. Roundly decides that she needs to start thinking of her son more and planning for the future again. She has some money that her husband left her, so she decides to see the lawyer in the village, Mr. James, about investing it on her son’s behalf, so her son will be able to buy a farm when he is grown. Mr. James is the same lawyer who holds the mortgage on the Levels’ property, and the money that Mr. Level borrowed from Mr. James is the money that Mrs. Roundly invested with him. Mr. Level was in debt at the time, and he promised to repay the loan with interest, using his house as collateral for the loan. The money that Mr. Level must repay is being managed by Mr. James, but it’s actually for young Solomon Roundly and his mother. 

Mr. Level is not good at managing his money, he has been careless about making his payments on time, and because he didn’t tell Handie or his mother about it, there was no one else to remind him or make sure that he repaid the money he borrowed. Mr. James has already extended the loan and given Mr. Level chances to make payments, and Mr. Level hasn’t done it. Mr. James can’t in good conscience allow Mr. Level to not repay a widow and a fatherless boy the money he owes them because he knows they really need it. That’s why he’s insisting on payment now or he’ll take the house.

When we return to the present after the flashback that explains the nature of the problem, Handie decides that the only thing to do is to see Mr. James himself and try to negotiate with him on behalf of his father and family. On his way, he meets Captain Early, who offers him a ride. Handie accepts and decides to ask Captain Early for advice about debts and mortgages. Because his father doesn’t understand much about money matters, Handie also doesn’t really understand mortgages or what the family’s options are. 

Captain Early says that if the property that’s mortgaged is worth more than the current mortgage, it could be possible to take out a second mortgage from a different person and use it to pay off the first one, thus buying some time to fully repay the debt. Handie has some misgivings about this approach. Captain Early doesn’t think it would be hard to find another investor who would be willing to lend money in the hopes of earning interest on it, but Handie now knows that his father isn’t good at paying his debts or even the interest on them. Still, it’s the only sensible solution that anyone has proposed so far, so he decides to discuss the possibility with Mr. James.

When Handie goes to see Mr. James, they discuss the situation. Handie explains that he didn’t understand the state of his father’s finances before or he would have helped his father pay the debt, and Mr. James explains why he’s reluctant to allow them more time to pay. The reason why the matter is so pressing is that Mrs. Roundly and her son are living in a rented house, and the man who owns it is in need of money and wants to sell the property. If Mrs. Roundly gets her money back, she could buy the home herself, and she and her son could continue to live there. If she doesn’t, she will have to worry about where she and her son will live. To let the Levels continue living in their home while not repaying the debt would result in the Roundlys being evicted, and that would hardly be fair, since it was really their money in the beginning.

Handie agrees that it would be unjust to not repay the debt to the Roundlys and put their situation in danger, and he promises to try to work things out so he and his father can repay the money. Mr. James appreciates Handie’s practicality and understanding, and he says that it’s too bad that Handie is only 19 years old. If he was 21, he would be a legal adult, and he would be willing to invest in Handie himself to repay Handie’s father’s debt. The only reason why he can’t do it now is that, until Handie is a legal adult, his signature on any agreement wouldn’t be legally binding. Also, technically, under the law, Handie’s time and money don’t belong to him but to his father. Even if his father would allow him to have time and money to himself, everything that belongs to Handie, and even Handie himself, legally belongs to his father until he’s a legal adult. 

As for what Captain Early said about taking out another mortgage or loan, even if Handie tried to arrange such a thing, any loan made to him would really, legally, be another loan to his father. Even if Handie gave his father the money to settle his debt or any other loan, there would be no guarantee that his father would actually use the money for that purpose. Legally, he can do what he wants with any money Handie gives him, even if Handie is the one who earned it, and even if he just wastes it instead of settling his debts. The truth is that Mr. James has already approached potential investors about making another loan to Mr. Level, but nobody wants to loan him money. Mr. Level has been complaining openly to people in the village about how unfair it is that he’s going to lose his house because he hasn’t repaid his loan. By doing all that complaining, he’s publicly outed himself as a bad debtor, and while people feel sorry for him, nobody wants to trust him with their money.

The situation looks hopeless to Handie. All he can think of is that his family will have to sell their house and move somewhere else. Because they can get more money from the sale of the house than they need to cover the debt, they could use that money to move somewhere else. Mr. James says that whoever buys the house might lease it back to them so they can continue to live there. They would just be paying rent to continue living in the house rather than paying the mortgage. It’s not a great solution, but it’s the only one open to them, and they will be left with some money from it. Handie explains the plan to his parents and to Mrs. Roundly, and they all agree to it.

It will take a couple of months to settle the sale of the house, so Handie tells his father that they must try to earn as much money as they can during that time. Mr. Level says that there’s no way they can earn enough to stop the sale of the house in that time, but Handie says that it doesn’t matter. Whatever money they can earn will help in setting them up with a place to live and improving their financial situation. Thinking again about the offer of a job delivering lumber, Handie decides that, rather than trying to buy a horse and wagon, maybe he could rent one. He does so, his father begins delivering lumber, and he and his father begin saving up money and paying down the debt.

Then, Mr. James sends Handie a message to come see him. Mr. James has received word that Handie’s uncle has died and left him a small farm called Three Pines. Because his uncle left the farm to Handie and not to his father, Mr. James is to hold it in trust for him until he is 22. (This is one year past the age of adulthood, but this is what his uncle specified.) There is money to go with the property, and as the executor of the estate, Mr. James is directed to use the money to fix up the property and rent it out to a tenant on Handie’s behalf until Handie is old enough to have it. The bequest would be helpful to Handie if he could use it immediately to pay his father’s debt, but there is still the issue that Handie is underage. While Mr. James can rent out the property and use the money on Handie’s behalf, it would be against the terms of the will to use the money to pay Handie’s father’s debts. While helping his father would indirectly help Handie, that’s not quite good enough to satisfy the terms of the uncle’s will.

What Mr. James suggests is that they follow the terms of the will that require him to use the money from the estate to hire someone to fix up the property, and to that end, he will hire Handie to do the work and pay him for it. It seems odd to be hired and paid to work on a house that’s technically his, but it’s a logical solution to the problem. Because of the lawyer’s strict interpretation of the will and his role in executing it, he doesn’t think it would be appropriate to give Handie an advance on his work so he can settle the debt right away, insisting that Handie must do the work before getting any money. Handie thinks he’s being too strict, which is not really in his best interests at the moment, but he doesn’t see how he can argue. The proposition that Mr. James makes for him would still allow him to earn more money than he is currently earning.

When he tells his parents about the bequest and Mr. James’s proposition, they are happy that Handie’s uncle left him something but disappointed that Mr. James is unwilling to use the situation to help them more immediately. Handie himself thinks that Mr. James should have made a little exception to the rules to give him an advance on the money, although he has a dream that night that gives him a different perspective. In his dream, a fairy argues with a clock, telling it that it would do some good for it to go a little faster sometimes and a little slower at others, according to people’s needs. The clock says that the trouble is that, if he speeds up for one person, he might go too fast for another person’s needs, and if he slows down too much, it might cause trouble for someone who needs time to go faster. Because changing the flow of time can hurt one person at the same time as it helps another, it’s better for him to just keep the correct time. 

When he wakes up, Handie thinks about his weird dream and realizes that Mr. James is like the clock because he has to go strictly according to the rules, stable and predictable, to keep the situation steady for everyone. Sometimes, he might be tempted to do someone a favor by tilting the balance for them, but that can throw off other people who are also depending on him to follow the rules. Handie also considers the purpose behind his uncle’s will. His uncle and his father didn’t get along well, and his uncle was aware that his father was terrible at handling money. Handie himself has now become acquainted with his father’s lack of money sense and how it affects the rest of the family. He realizes that his uncle left his farm to Handie because he had heard that Handie was a practical boy and a good worker and would be more likely to take care of it. Therefore, he skipped over Handie’s father and left the farm directly to Handie, to be held in trust for him until he was a full adult to make sure that Handie’s father couldn’t use it for his own purposes or that Handie wouldn’t sacrifice something that would make a real difference to his future in his efforts to help his father. His uncle was planning for the long term, not the short term, something which Handie’s father never does but which Handie will have to learn to do if he wants a better future. Mr. James understands this thinking as well as Handie does, and that’s why he’s so adamant that they follow the terms of the will exactly.

When Handie speaks to Mr. James again, Mr. James reminds him that his father has a legal right to Handie’s time and anything that he earns through the use of his time. Time is a valuable resource, and Handie’s father owns his as a piece of property until Handie turns 21 years old. (In the book, Mr. James says, “You see the law requires that children should do something to reimburse to their parents the expense which they have caused them in bringing them up. … . They are required to remain a certain number of years to assist their fathers and mothers by working for them or with them. The time when they are finally free is when they are twenty-one years old.” This isn’t how society or the law would look at it in modern times, but I’ll have more to say about that later.) What Mr. James proposes to Handie is that he literally buy Handie’s time from his father, the remaining 2 years until Handie is 21 years old, for enough money to pay off the mortgage and give him plenty of extra money. If he does that, Handie will be working for Mr. James instead of his father for the next two years, and whatever he does or whatever he earns in that time would be for Mr. James. Handie agrees to this proposal because it would take care of his father’s money troubles. 

However, Mr. James improves the offer by saying that Handie has the ability to buy his own time, in which case he will be working for himself, owning his own time and his own earnings. He has spoken to a gentleman in the village who is willing to establish a loan for Handie, which he can use to buy his time from his father. As long as Handie stays healthy and continues working during the next two years, he will have more than enough money to repay that loan. Handie asks what happens if he gets sick or dies. Mr. James says this arrangement will require him to take out life insurance as security, to repay the loan in case something happens to him. The farm Handie has waiting for him can also be security for the loan in case Handie is sick or injured, and Mr. James will also endorse the note, meaning that he will pay the debt if Handie is unable to do it. It’s suitable for Mr. James to do that as the trustee for Handie’s inheritance and more legally-binding because Handie is still a minor.

Handie explains this new proposal to his parents, and they all agree to it. Handie’s mother is worried that this arrangement will involve Handie leaving home, and she doesn’t know what they’ll do with out him, but Handie says it’s necessary for him to go to the farm he’s inherited and begin fixing it up. It will bring in more money in the long run, and he will come home to his parents when everything is order and the farm is ready to lease to a tenant until Handie is 21. When they accept the proposal, Mr. Level is able to pay off his mortgage and save his ownership of his house, and he has enough money left over to buy his own horse and wagon to use in his new delivery job. With the family’s fortunes looking much better, Handie prepares to go to farm and begin his work there.

Hiring Rainbow

So far, the story has mostly focused on Handie and his family, and we haven’t seen much of Rainbow since he was helping young Solomon, but this is a small village, and Handie does know who Rainbow is. This is the part of the story that establishes the relationship between Handie and Rainbow and how Handie decides to hire Rainbow to help him with the work on his new farm.

As Handie prepares to go to the farm, which is near another town, Mr. James talks to him about the arrangements he’s made to provide Handie with money to pay him the wages for working for his own estate and also to allow him to buy whatever supplies and hardware he will need for repairs around the farm. Because Mr. James won’t be there to oversee things directly, he’s made arrangements to send money to Handie through another lawyer who lives near the farm. 

Handie is young, but he’s had experience as a carpenter. He can handle most of the work himself, but carpenters frequently need assistants to act as an extra pair of hands, helping them by holding boards in place or handing them tools as needed. Mr. James says that it would be appropriate for him to hire an assistant to help him, and he will provide money from the estate for that purpose. Since Handie doesn’t know anyone in this new town and wouldn’t know who to hire there, he decides that it would be better to bring an assistant with him from his village. He chooses Rainbow because, even though Rainbow is only 14 years old at this point, he’s big and strong for his age and is a good worker. He hasn’t had any training in carpentry at this point, but he doesn’t really need any experience to be an assistant. Rainbow is good at following instructions and is eager to do a good job and please people, and that’s more important.

Before he asks Rainbow if he wants the job, Handie tells Mr. James what he’s thinking to see if he thinks it’s a good idea. Mr. James says that, before he talks to Rainbow, he needs to decide how much money he would be willing to pay Rainbow out of the estate and what his accommodations would be while they’re in the other town. Handie proposes what he thinks would be a decent wage for an assistant and says that he will pay for Rainbow’s room and board. They will have to board somewhere in town until the farm is suitable for them to live in. Mr. James says that may be difficult because not every boarding house would be willing to have a “colored” tenant. Tenants in boarding houses all eat together at the same dining table, and not everyone will want to see at the same table as a black person. (This is just like Rainbow said that the other boys at school wouldn’t want to sit with him and would make trouble.) Handie is confident that he can find a place for them to board anyway, so Mr. James says that the plan sounds fine to him, as along as Rainbow agrees to it and Rainbow’s mother approves.

Handie goes to Rainbow’s house, but Rainbow’s mother says that he isn’t home because he’s working in Mrs. Roundly’s garden. Deciding that he should offer the job directly to Rainbow first before talking to his mother, Handie goes to find Rainbow.

Rainbow is working with young Solomon in the garden, and when they stop to rest, Rainbow says that he has a new story to tell, besides his usual bear one. A man read it to him recently out of a newspaper. It’s about a thief who was caught trying to steal money from a miser, and there’s an interlude in the main story where Rainbow tells this story. (Actually, it’s more like the thief was trying to get the miser’s money through extortion because he writes the miser a threatening note, demanding that he leave a sack of money in a particular place.) The miser’s sons set a trap for the thief and catch him.

As Rainbow finishes the story, Handie comes along and explains his job offer to Rainbow. It would require the two of them living in another town about 30 or 40 miles away for about 2 or 3 months. Feeling like he should tell Rainbow the hardest parts of the job, he says that the work will be physically rough, and he’s not sure exactly where they will be staying or what the “fare” (food) will be like, but he promises that, if Rainbow comes with him, he will pay him and that Rainbow will eat as well as he does himself. The physically hard parts of the job don’t sound appealing, but like most boys his age, Rainbow is adventurous, and the idea of going to another town, exact destination unknown, sounds exciting. Young Solomon thinks it sounds exciting, too, and he says he wants to go along. Solomon tries to prove to Handie how much he can lift, and Handie says that’s pretty impressive, and he would take him, if he could.

Turning serious, Handie asks Rainbow what he really thinks of the job offer. Rainbow says that he likes the idea, but he’s not sure what his mother will think and if she will be all right at home without him. Handie says that Rainbow can talk it over with his mother, and Rainbow persuades him to come along to see her and explain the job himself. At first, Handie is worried about the objections that Rainbow’s mother, Rose, might make, but actually, Rose is a sensible woman and sees that this is a good job offer for her son. She will miss him while he’s gone, but she doesn’t want him to miss out on this opportunity because of that. Since they’ve all agreed that Rainbow will have the job as Handie’s assistant, Handie and Rainbow begin their packing and preparations for the journey to Handie’s farm.

Even though Rainbow’s latest new story was one told to him by someone else, we are told at this point that Rainbow has made progress in learning to read and is now doing well enough at it to find it enjoyable rather than a chore. He is now able to read from the New Testament. His mother laments that he can’t write as well as he can read. She hasn’t been able to teach him more because she’s not that good at writing herself. Because Rainbow can’t write very well, he won’t be able to write letters to her while he’s away. Rainbow says that Handie could help him with that, and his mother tells him that, while Handie is his employer, Rainbow should call him Mr. Level. Handie is almost a grown man, and he is acting as grown man, doing professional work and being Rainbow’s employer and supervisor. (The book uses the term “master”, but they don’t mean it in the slave sense. This story was written and published before the Civil War, and slavery is legal during this period, but Rainbow is a free person, who is being employed at his own consent and paid a salary. The term “master in this case is more in the sense of a supervisor, someone who will be directing Rainbow’s work and overseeing the results.) Rose tells Rainbow that, if he has any problems on this job or if he does anything that causes a problem, he needs to be honest and tell Mr. Level (Handie) about it. If Handie knows what the problems are, he can help fix them, and hiding them would only make them worse. She has a little rhyme about it:

“Wrong declared
is half repaired;
while wrong concealed
is never healed.”

She also tells him that if anyone in this new town tries to give him a hard time or tease him because he is “colored”, he shouldn’t mind them. Rainbow says that’s very hard sometimes. Rose says that she understands but that fighting people wouldn’t do any good. He is likely to be outnumbered (that’s literally what it means to be a “minority”), so it’s better to use patience and show as little reaction as possible. They’re more likely to stop their teasing if he doesn’t give them the reaction they’re trying to provoke. Rose uses some local dogs as an example, pointing out how each of them responds to teasing. The one that just responds to teasing with a look of contempt doesn’t get teased as much. Rainbow points out that the dog who doesn’t react could probably head off further teasing if he put a scare into the teaser, but Rose says that only works if someone is big enough to put a scare to a teaser without actually hurting him and if the bully doesn’t have a bunch of confederates backing him up.

She further reminds Rainbow that the Gospel says, “that we must study to show kindness to those that do not show kindness to us.” She says that, while he’s away, she wants him to continue reading the New Testament and saying his prayers. She also makes a point that she wants him to think about the meaning of what he’s reading and have it in his mind that he will follow it in his life. She hopes that perhaps, during his time with Handie, Rainbow will improve his reading and writing ability and that Handie will help him. Before Rainbow leaves the village, he goes around to say goodbye to some friends and neighbors, and one of them gives him an inkstand and pens so he can write.

This installment of the series ends with Handie and Rainbow leaving on their journey to the new town, Southerton. We are told that, “Handie and Rainbow had a very pleasant ride, but they met with an accident on the road which led to a singular series of adventures. They, however, at last arrived at Southerton in safety, and spent two months there in a very agreeable and profitable manner.” This is kind of a spoiler for the next book in the series, which is all about their adventures on their journey. We know that they eventually arrive safely and proceed about their business, but the narrator promises to tell everything in more detail in the next volume. Actually, there are also spoilers for the rest of the series because we are also told that everything goes well with Handie’s farm, Mr. James is able to find a good tenant to rent it, and when Handie eventually returns home, he finds that his parents have been doing well and that Handie is able to repay the loan that bought his time from his father. There’s no suspense about any of that, whatever else happens in the following stories. In fact, the book says that the loan worked out so well for Handie that Rainbow thinks that he’d like to try a similar arrangement when he’s older. Handie says that, by that time, he might have the money to make him a loan himself.

I covered some of this above, but there are a few more things I’d like to talk about. Although the plot is a little slow and must of it focuses on how business deals work and the importance of hard work and prudent living, I actually thought it was an interesting book. What I found most interesting about it was the look at the daily lives and concerns of people in the mid-19th century.

I was a little surprised at the way the lawyer explained the laws concerning the ownership of Handie’s time and the laws about the obligations between children and parents. The relationships between children and parents and how they should behave toward each other, specifically what children owe to their parents are central to the story. 

The parents in the story aren’t perfect people. Handie’s parents have some obvious flaws, particularly Handie’s father. Handie and his mother would have some justification for being upset with Mr. Level for getting their family into this financial hole and then depending on Handie to work out a solution, but they’re not really angry with him. Mr. Level is within his legal rights to use his money and theirs in whatever way he wants as the head of the household and Handie’s father, even though it’s obvious that he doesn’t really know what he’s doing. Nobody questions Mr. Level’s legal authority over his family’s financial affairs, although everyone knows he isn’t good at handling money, and they haven’t been able to get him to improve before. However, Mr. James and Handie recognize that whatever solution they work out together can’t violate Mr. Level’s rights to make decisions about his family’s affairs and must respect his authority over his son. What Mr. James suggests to Handie is a way of emancipating Handie’s financial affairs from his father’s while providing Mr. Level with generous compensation, which improves the circumstances of the entire family.

The part about children legally owing their parents some form of compensation for the costs of raising them surprised me. I’ve heard of that as a social convention, but I didn’t think there were actual laws about that. I’m not completely sure whether the author was right about that part or not because I had some trouble finding a source to verify that, but if anyone else knows the answer, feel free to comment below and tell us. 

In modern times, there are laws about the care of children, and parents can be charged with neglect if they fail to provide certain necessities for their children, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a modern law about children giving compensation to their parents. After all, children can’t choose their parents like they can choose from among possible employers and negotiate their terms, so it’s not quite like entering into a business arrangement. I can see the logic of children helping the parents who raised them as part of family loyalty and affection, but the amount of care that family members show each other is difficult to codify because it’s hard to measure and put a price tag on human feelings. Emotional support is a natural and important part of family life, and it occurs to me that might be difficult to prove how much family members might have shown to each other. People value it, and it’s hard to say how much of that might be a service that they render to each other in a family. 

It also occurs to me that individual families in the past may not have looked at their family through a legal lens, even if they had the legal means to do so. When Handie speaks to his parents about reorganizing their family’s financial affairs and about his new position, repairing the farm he inherited on behalf of his own estate, Handie tells his parents that, when he returns home from this job, he will live with them again but that he will pay them for his room and board. His mother tells him that paying to live with them won’t be necessary because he’s their son, but Handie insists because he will be working and earning money as an independent person, no longer a dependent of his father. 

What that exchange tells me is that Handie’s mother doesn’t view him as an economic resource for their family. He’s just their son, and she loves him and would care for him, even if he couldn’t pay her for it. Their family isn’t overly concerned about money, they hardly even know how to manage the money they have, but they do understand family and human feeling. There are upsides to that because they are prepared to support each other just out of love and family loyalty, even when that would hurt their financial situation. The downside is that Handie has realized that, for their family’s future security, they’re going to have to be a little more strict about the financial aspects of the life they share together. While he is grateful for his parents’ feelings for him, he thinks that insisting on upholding his financial obligations to his parents will be more beneficial to them in the long run. 

Maybe people in real life looked at it in a similar fashion, depending on their own family’s circumstances. Maybe there were times when they didn’t care that much about keeping track of each family member’s financial contributions and insisting on exact repayment from each other because their feelings for each other were in the balance and/or because some family members might not be in a position to compensate each other financially to the same degree because of health reasons or other issues. If the law is really as Mr. James says it is, the rules about children compensating their parents might have only been invoked in situations where there was some serious dysfunction in the family, like if a child resisted working or helping out at home at all, and the parents were desperate. If the parents were satisfied with their relationships with their children, they probably wouldn’t bother to keep strict accounting of their children’s monetary value or get petty about the laws with them. At least, that’s my theory. In the case of the story, the characters are in a pretty serious financial problem, with the threat of losing their home, so they seriously need to straighten out their finances according to the law.

So far, because most of the focus of the story is on the Levels’ financial woes and how they straighten out their affairs, the story hasn’t gone into detail about race relations. However, I already know that this becomes more of a central theme in later installments of the story. At this point, we know that Rainbow couldn’t go to school like Handie did because he wasn’t welcome there. Nobody uses the term “segregation”, but that’s basically what it is. Nobody explains the laws regarding this kind of segregation, so I’m not sure if there’s an official law about that for this village or not, but there seems to be at least a social convention about that. 

Rainbow says that people have teased and taunted him about his race, although when he’s about to leave home with Handie, many of the local boys say goodbye to him in a friendly way. The book says that many of the local boys like Rainbow because he is kind, which made me wonder how many of those boys were the ones who didn’t want Rainbow in school with them. The story isn’t clear on that point, although I have heard of that concept of some white people liking black people as long as those black people “know their place.” I suspect that the situation in this town may be something like that. Maybe most of the townspeople accept Rainbow in a general way, as a neighbor and a worker and someone they might wave to or chat with, but they can get offended or even nasty if he starts getting above the station that they think he should occupy in life. We don’t have any specific names of people who have harassed Rainbow, so we don’t know if any of them are also sometimes friendly, as long as they think they have the social upper hand. It just strikes me that many of Rainbow’s relationships with the people in this village are probably conditional ones, the condition being that he doesn’t seem like he’s trying to be as good as or better than they are.

Handie and Rainbow haven’t been far from home at this point in their lives, and going to this new town will be a major adventure for them. Mr. James knows that Rainbow may have some problems from the people they meet along the way and that Handie may have trouble finding places for them to eat and sleep on their journey because Rainbow is black. However, Handie decides that he really wants Rainbow and that he’s willing to take responsibility for the both of them and deal with whatever problems they encounter. When Handie promises Rainbow that Rainbow will eat as well as he does, he’s promising that either he will make sure that people give Rainbow the services that they both need or that he will forgo those services himself. He will only stay and eat in places that accept Rainbow as well, whatever that means for them both along the way. Handie is becoming a young man, and as befits a real man, he’s taking responsibility for someone younger and is determined to look after him as both an employer and friend. There will be more to say about this as we continue through the story.

Little House in the Big Woods

Little House on the Prairie Series

Little House in the Big Woods by Laura Ingalls Wilder, 1932.

The story begins “60 years ago”, in a little house in the woods in Wisconsin, where a little girl named Laura lives with her parents and her two sisters, Mary and Carrie. Mary is older than Laura, and Carrie is younger. Their father hunts for meat for the family in the woods, and although Laura worries about the wolves in the woods, she and her family are safe in their little house.

Much of the family’s time is occupied with getting and preserving food. Food preservation is important because not every hunting trip is successful, and they need to make sure that they make the best use of every animal they get, as well as dairy products and produce. Laura and Carrie like to play among the food being stored in the attic. One of their favorite chores is helping their mother mold butter into shape with their butter mold, and often, the highlight of their day is getting something special to eat.

The story begins in winter, and Christmas is coming. The girls help their mother to prepare some special foods and treats, like apple pie and vinegar pie. They make candy by pouring a molasses syrup over snow to freeze it. The girls’ aunt, uncle, and cousins come to visit, staying overnight. The children have fun playing in the snow, making what they call “pictures” by throwing themselves down in the snow and seeing what type of shapes they can make with their bodies. The family has a feast, during which the children are not allowed to talk because “children should be seen and not heard”, but they don’t really mind because the food is really good, and they can have as much as they like. The children believe in Santa, and they are happy with the simple presents they receive: a pair of red mittens and a peppermint stick each.

Laura also receives a very special present: her first real rag doll. Her older sister already has a rag doll, but up to this point, Laura didn’t. Her only doll was made from a corn cob. Children of their time don’t get many presents, and the youngest children don’t get any at all or only have improvised toys. The other children aren’t angry or jealous because Laura has received this extra present because she is younger than they are. Only the babies in the family are younger than Laura, and the older chidren know that Laura didn’t already have a doll, like they do. Laura isn’t being favored; it’s just that she is now old enough to get this kind of present.

Although the family is safe when they’re in their log cabin, there is a genuine risk of attack from wild animals when they’re outside. Members of the family talk about close encounters they or other people had with panthers or bears. Laura’s Pa has a humorous encounter with a tree stump that he mistakes for a bear in the snow, while Ma actually slaps a bear because she mistook it for the family cow.

As the seasons change, the family activities change. They help relatives make maple syrup, and they have a dance. The girls have their first trip to town with their parents. Pa gathers honey, and Ma makes straw hats. Pa helps a relative with his harvest, and a cousin who plays mean tricks instead of helping gets his comeuppance.

I couldn’t find a copy of this book to read online, probably because of the racial language in the story, but there are shorter books on Internet Archive based on individual incidents in this story, like the winter and Christmas scenes. I thought those were the best parts of the story anyway. I would recommend those shorter books and picture books over the original for young children.

My Reaction

Things I Liked and Didn’t Like

It’s been a long time since I first read this book, and honestly, I didn’t like it as much as I did the first time. I remembered kind of liking it when I was a teen. I can’t remember exactly how old I was the first time I read it, I might have been a young teen or tween, but I know I didn’t read Little House on the Prairie books as a young child. My mother wasn’t really into the series herself, so she didn’t read them to me or recommend them much. (She preferred Nancy Drew, and really, so did I.) I know I lost interest in the series after reading only one or two more books because it seemed like that poor family was always getting sick everywhere they moved, and I found that depressing. This book series is one of the reasons why I don’t believe that exercise and organic food by themselves keep a person from being sick. This family had both, and it never helped them. During the course of the series, they catch everything from malaria to scarlet fever or meningoencephalitis, whichever it was that eventually made Mary go blind. It’s like all of the diseases my characters died from in the Oregon Trail computer game but in book form. Come to think of it, people on the Oregon Trail were also exercising and eating organic, and I’ve seen the real tombstones of pioneer children. I believe in sanitation and vaccinations.

As an adult, I found much of the first half this particular book boring or frustrating. That’s surprising because I usually like books with details about life in the past, and many of the details in this particular book echo stories passed down in my own family. (I also had ancestors with strict traditions about not working on Sundays, and they also ate cold meals on Sundays because they had to do all the Sunday cooking the day before.) I found some of the early parts of this story grating. The main reason is that this book is not actually a single story. There is no real, over-arching plot. It’s basically a collection of episodic reminiscences and family stories. I found some of them interesting, but not the early parts.

The book isn’t bad because the writing quality is pretty good, but in the first part of the book, there are long descriptions of hunting and food. I hated the descriptions of how they processed animals they hunted and butchered. I’m sure they’re true-to-life, but I’m the squeamish type. The parts where they talk about foods they like are better. They have kind of a cozy feel, with homemade meals and goodies that have kind of a nostalgic feel. However, I’m not that much of a foodie, and I’m not into “food porn” or long detailed descriptions of things other people are eating. There are limits to how much of that I can take before I start wanting more plot to happen. I think food descriptions are good when used to add color and atmosphere to a story, but it’s too much when they start turning into the story itself. Ideally, a good food description in the book will make me think of a story I liked the next time I eat that particular food. When it’s too overwhelming, there isn’t much of a story to be transported to. Part of the reason why Laura dwells on the subject of food is that this family has to struggle and work hard to get it. It’s not always guaranteed, and when there is something extra, there’s reason for celebration. They are poor, and treats are rare. I think that part of the reason why this book was so popular during the 1930s, when it was first published, was that many other children were growing up in a similar situation during the Great Depression.

When there is more action in the first part story, it’s typically that someone has a close encounter with a dangerous wild animal, like a panther or a bear. Most of this isn’t something that little Laura witnesses directly, but people will tell her stories about family members who had this happen to them. It happens repeatedly throughout the book. One really exciting encounter with a wild animal who wants to eat someone makes for a good adventure story, but when it happens repeatedly, the novelty goes out of it. It starts to become more like, “Oh, another animal attack incident story. Everybody’s got one.” Ma slapping the bear was something special, though. After the other descriptions of animal attacks, Pa’s mistaking a stump for a bear and Ma actually slapping a real bear felt like the punchline of a joke.

People in Laura’s family carry guns with them whenever they go out both for hunting purposes and because they are living in a real wilderness full of dangerous animals, and there is always a real possibility that they might have to defend themselves from a bear, panther, or wolf. They also eat bear when they can get one, and Laura likes the way it tastes. One of the chores that the kids find fun is when they help their father make his own bullets using molten lead in a bullet mold. I actually know someone who does this in modern times. Some modern gun hobbyists do, but I’m not into guns myself, so I didn’t find that as interesting as other types of home crafts. As the book continued and the seasons changed, there was more variety in activities for the family, and I started getting more interested.

The books in this series are semi-autobiographical, based on the real life and childhood of the author, Laura Ingalls Wilder. Laura Ingalls Wilder is actually the Laura from the book. That’s partly why the book isn’t structured liked a story so much as a collection of reminiscences, because this is just about what she remembers from her early life and family. I appreciated some of the small details of daily life, like the log cabin where the family lives, the butter mold with the strawberry shape, the trundle bed where the girls sleep, the lanterns they use for lighting, the family’s Sunday traditions, how the ladies prepared for their dance, and how they made maple syrup and straw hats. The parts of the story that I didn’t like so well were the parts where she goes on about the parts of life in the past that interest me the least. I don’t like hunting, I have no interest in guns, I don’t like hearing about butchering animals, and I’m not the kind of person who gets excited about animal attacks. (I never liked watching them on National Geographic, and I refuse to watch Shark Week or anything like it.) The parts I liked better were about using items that people just don’t use anymore and often don’t even have in their homes and the things the family did for fun and entertainment or celebrating holidays.

One of best scenes in the book, which is probably many people’s favorite, is the Christmas episode. It’s charming how Laura and her family make candy by pouring molasses syrup over snow. People can still do this today if they want to try an old-fashioned treat. It’s also heart-warming that they spend Christmas with visiting relatives, playing outside in the snow and enjoying a few simple presents, mostly handmade. They take great pleasure in simple activities and small presents because much of the rest of their lives were about chores and basic survival, and special treats and presents of any kind were rare. I thought about this book during the covid pandemic, when many people couldn’t safely visit with family or friends for Christmas. This is just one household of people, with just a few relatives visiting for a day, enjoying a few simple pleasures and homemade food and fun. It can be possible to enjoy very simple, homemade activities if you take the time to fully appreciate them and really throw yourself into making the most of them. The Christmas scene was the one that really stayed with me from my first reading when I was young, and it was the main reason why I wanted to read it again. I forgot most of the rest of the book.

Racial Language Issues

One thing that many people find distasteful about the Little House on the Prairie books these days is that books in the series have inappropriate racial language. This sort of thing went completely over my head when I was a kid because I didn’t know what some of these words meant, but it really jumps out at me now. At one point in the story, Laura’s father plays his fiddle and sings a folk song called Uncle Ned (that link is to a page from Missouri State University with words and music), which is about a black man who dies and uses the word “darkey” repeatedly. To be completely honest, I listened to the entire recording of this song, and I have no idea why anybody would like it. It’s not the only song Pa sings in the story about someone dying, and I can’t figure out why he thinks any songs like that are fun. They just sound depressing to me. But, Uncle Ned stands out from the other songs because of the racial slur.

I want to stress that it definitely is a slur. “Darkey” was not a polite term even during the time the story was set. People said it, but it was rude and insulting slang, not a word for polite conversation. Black people did have feelings about racial terms, and there were terms that were preferred and polite and terms that were considered demeaning and insulted and were known to be deliberately condescending. This particular term belongs to the second category. Black people weren’t always able to openly express their real feelings about the rude terms because of threatened violence for anything they might say, but their inability to speak openly about the issue doesn’t change the reality of the issue. There were 19th century white people who were well aware of what terms were polite and which were impolite, and they made active efforts to teach children to speak politely, such as the editors of this 19th century children’s magazine and Rev. Jacob Abbott, author of the Stories of Rainbow and Lucky (1859-1860), among other children’s books. Both of those sources are older than Laura Ingalls Wilder, pre-Civil War. Abbott made it a point to include a conversation between a grandfather and grandson in one of his Rainbow and Lucky stories to teach children the polite way to address black people of their time (“black” was one of the less preferred terms until the Civil Rights era, when people wanted to distance themselves from older racial terms and their accompanying emotional baggage, but the advice to care about others’ feelings and what they want to be called still holds true):

“I don’t know who they are, grandfather,” said he, after gazing at Handie and Rainbow a moment intently. “One of them is a black fellow.”
“Call him a colored fellow, Jerry,” said the old man. “They all like to be called colored people, and not black people. Every man a right to be called by whatever name he likes best himself.”
“But this is a boy,” replied Jerry.
“The same rule holds good in respect to boys,” added the old man. “Never call a boy by any name you think he don’t like; it only makes ill blood.”

True politeness requires consideration for others’ feelings, not denial of them, which would be the exact opposite of politeness by literal definition. Politeness is about avoiding what would offend others and emphasizing behaviors others find pleasant, not about doing only what pleases oneself or choosing to take personal offense at the idea of considering another’s feelings.

So, what’s the deal with Pa Ingalls? If other white adults of this era cared and tried to teach their children to care, why doesn’t he? Some people might point out that he’s just singing a song and that he didn’t write the song, which is true. In this particular instance, he’s effectively quoting someone else. That being said, this is just the first instance of questionable racial terms and attitudes in this series, and some of the later ones are worse. After thinking it over, I think what it comes down to is that the Ingalls family has little need to consider how people of other races feel specifically because of the way they live. Most of the time, there are simply no “others” in their lives to consider.

Nobody thinks anything of this type of language in the story or comments on it because, remember, this family lives in a log cabin in the woods with no close neighbors. They rarely go to town, and when they visit with other people, it’s usually other relatives, like the children’s aunt and uncle or grandparents. What I’m saying is that, when you live alone much of the time or surrounded only by people like you, especially close relatives, you don’t have to put much energy or thought into how to live with other people. The Ingalls family doesn’t have to think about any of this, so they just don’t think about any of this. But, when it comes right down to it, that’s certainly not the kind of life I’ve lived or the kind of life modern 21st century children live.

Since my first encounter with this book, I grew up in a city, in multicultural society full of people to interact with every day, and I got a higher education with a heavy focus on cultural issues. Some of the words in this book went over my head the first time, but I grew up. This book did not grow with me, and the racial language is one of the parts that not only doesn’t hold up but feels worse when you’re older and know better. This is not a book that has greater depth and provides more insight when you go back and read it as an adult with more life experience, as some children’s books do. Instead, it brings out some uncomfortable realizations about characters you liked before and the lives they live.

I’ve read that some newer printings of these books have changed the problematic parts, which is actually very common with older classic children’s books that are still in print. The same thing was done to old Stratemeyer Syndicate books like the Bobbsey Twins, Mary Poppins books, and various books by Enid Blyton. I was surprised when I found out what some of the original editions of those books were like. However, I haven’t seen a new copy of any of the Little House on the Prairie books to know how much has changed. There are parts of this series that I remembered from reading them the first time, mostly the Christmas scenes, but I’m just not really into this series. There are others I like better. Overall, I really prefer the Grandma’s Attic series to the Little House on the Prairie series because it also has details of daily life in the past, but I feel like it has more variety and warm humor to the stories in those books, and there are no inappropriate racial terms. My own grandmother grew up on a farm in Indiana, and she specifically recommended the Grandma’s Attic series to me, saying that it reminded her of her youth. She never mentioned or recommended Little House on the Prairie books, so I suppose she wasn’t as into those, either.

Sing Down the Moon

Sing Down the Moon cover

Sing Down the Moon by Scott O’Dell, 1970.

The story begins with a young Navajo girl, Bright Morning, admiring the beginning of spring, but she is caught in a storm and hurries home without the sheep she was supposed to be tending. When the girl’s mother realizes that she abandoned the sheep, she takes the girl back to the sheep, and they watch them all night. The sheep are very important to the family, and the girl’s mother refuses to allow her to take the sheep out by herself again for the rest of that spring.

When Bright Morning finally proves that she can be responsible and not leave the sheep to tend themselves, she is allowed to take them out again. Bright Morning likes to talk to the other girls, Running Bird and White Deer, as they watch all of their sheep together. The girls like to talk about their futures, who they will marry and what kind of children they have. They like to tease each other. Bright Morning’s friends know that she is likely to marry a young man called Tall Boy. The rumor is that Tall Boy’s parents want him to marry her because her mother owns so many fine sheep. Bright Morning knows that her friends tease because they are curious about Tall Boy and want her to talk about him, but she refuses. The girls know that he is supposed to be riding out with the warriors soon, and they tease that maybe he will bring back some other girl from the Ute tribe, but Bright Morning ignores them.

After the warriors have left for their raid on the Utes, the girls see some white men on horses approaching the village. The girls recognize them as oldiers and are worried that their village could be vulnerable to attack without the warriors. Later, the girls encounter more white men, but these men are not dressed as soldiers. They stop to talk to Bright Morning and Running Bird, asking them for directions, but the girls realize that they are slavers. They kidnap both girls and ride away with them!

They take the girls to a town of Spanish people and separate them from each other. They sell Bright Morning to a woman who uses her as a servant. The woman has other Native American girls as slaves, including a younger girl called Rosita. Rosita doesn’t mind her captivity or her life as a servant much. She came from a tribe that was very poor, and since she was brought to this woman’s household to work for her, she has had better food and clothing than she did at home. Rosita tells Bright Morning that the family they work for isn’t bad, and Bright Morning is allowed to keep her dog, who followed her when she was abducted. However, Bright Morning can’t stand her captivity. The woman who owns the house gives her new clothes, but Bright Morning doesn’t care. All she wants to do is find a way to go home.

Bright Morning is reunited with Running Bird when another captive girl comes up with a plan for the three of them to escape. They manage to steal horses and ride away from the town. Along the way, they meet up with Tall Boy and one of his friends, and the boys help fight off the Spaniards who are pursuing the girls. Unfortunately, Tall Boy is badly injured in the fight. He loses the use of one of his arms, and the other Navajos know that he can no longer be a warrior. Bright Morning still cares about Tall Boy, but her mother and sister tell her that she should no longer consider marrying him.

However, the Navajos’ troubles are just beginning. They haven’t heard the last of the soldiers. The American soldiers return and drive the Navajos off their land. They destroy all of their homes and eventually round them up and start them on a long march with little food, where many of them die. The Navajos fear that all of them will die. How will Bright Morning and her family survive, and will they ever see their homeland again?

The book is a Newbery Honor book. It’s available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive (multiple copies).

My Reaction

I remember reading this book when I was about 13 years old, in middle school! It takes place in my home state, the northern part, where the Navajo reservation is now, in the Four Corners region. I’ve been to Canyon de Chelly (“Chelly” is pronounced like “shay”, like in French) before, although I hadn’t been there at the time when I first read this book. Since I read this book as a kid, I’ve been to places and seen things that helped me understand the setting of the story better. As an adult, I appreciate the historical aspects of the story even more because I know more about the background. The book doesn’t give a date for the story until the postscript at the very end of the book, but the death march described in the story is Long Walk of 1863 to 1865.

The second half of the book is very depressing because there are horrible conditions and many deaths, including the deaths of children. I wasn’t sure that I really wanted to revisit this book at first because I remembered that it was depressing, but the book is well-written. The narrator describes events in an exciting, compelling way.

I had forgotten many details of the story, but there were some things that jumped out at me as an adult that I hadn’t noticed the first time. The postscript at the end of the story explains how life and Navajo culture changed after this traumatic event. If you see photographs of Navajo in “traditional” costumes now, they often include velveteen clothing, but that’s actually a relatively new tradition. The velveteen was adopted from white people during their captivity because they didn’t have access to wool to make their older style of traditional clothing. When Bright Morning was held captive in the Spanish town, she was given velveteen clothing there.

Another odd topic that is touched on only very briefly but that I know more about from other sources concerns the subject of flour. The book mentions that the Navajo were unused to eating wheat flour until it was their only form of rations during the Long Walk. Until then, their staple grain was corn, and when they started eating wheat flour, it made them feel sick. Their bodies just weren’t used to it. The book doesn’t explicitly explain this, but I know from other sources that the Long Walk and those flour rations were the origins of Navajo fry bread. Fry bread was not part of Navajo diet until that point. I grew up eating it on special occasions as a treat because it is greasy but good with powdered sugar, and it’s often served at carnivals and fairs here. However, as an adult, I came to realize that its origins as a food come from a very dark source. It was starvation food. It can keep you alive if there’s nothing else, but it’s not going to keep you healthy if you eat nothing else. It’s greasy and fatty, and it has little nutritional quality. Even now, I don’t have as much tolerance for it as I did when I was a kid. I can’t stomach it well these days if it’s too greasy or I eat too much.

That’s actually not a bad metaphor for the events described in this book. They’re heavy, and the more of it you understand and absorb, the sicker you feel. I absorb much more now than when I was a kid and only half understood the full significance of the events, and it makes me feel much worse than I did the first time.

So, do I recommend this book for kids? Actually, yes. I’m not a fan of depressing books with a lot of death, and I struggled through some depressing books when I was in school. If you had asked my 13-year-old self whether books with this much death and suffering were worth it, she might have had trouble answering that question, but time and further understanding have changed the way my adult self feels. There are some depressing topics that are worth the struggle to absorb them, but if I were the one teaching the lessons, I think I would do it a little differently than my teachers did for me back then.

I think this book is still a good introduction to topics that can be difficult to discuss. It’s worth reading once to understand the historical background of these events and what they really meant to the people who experienced them directly. It’s painful to read the bad parts, but it’s the kind of pain that leads to something better: real understanding. I recommend the book for kids in their early teens because I think that’s the best level for understanding it and accepting the bad parts. I think it should also be accompanied by nonfiction history lessons about the time period and events and discussion about their feelings about the story and historical events. I remember being told some of the history the first time I read this book, but I think that maybe there should have been more discussion about feelings.

I think it’s important to discuss feelings because they’re the hardest part of this book and they’re also the reason why it’s difficult to study some of the darker parts of history. I had a hard time with this when I was younger, and I still do in some respects, but I think understanding what causes those feelings is key to handling them. Reading books like this while discussing tools to handle difficult feelings could help students to better handle their emotions in other areas of life as well.

One of the first points that I think is important to understand and which my teachers didn’t really explain to me is that it’s natural to feel bad when you hear about bad things happening to other people, even when the bad things happened generations before you were born or even when those individual characters are fictional. (Bright Morning and her friends and family are fictional characters even though the events around them are historical. Real Navajos did experience what they experienced.) Empathy is a natural human emotion, and it’s an important tool for living with other people. Humans are social creatures. We live as part of larger groups, and we need at least some empathy to understand other people’s emotions and circumstances, how our actions affect them, and how to treat other people as we ourselves would truly like to be treated. The ability to experience empathy is a sign that you are mentally and emotionally healthy. It’s really only worrying when someone can’t feel it.

One of the most disturbing feelings about this story comes from realizing that the soldiers who are inflicting all of this death and pain either don’t feel empathy for the people they are harming or have actively chosen to ignore it to further their own purposes. That’s not a sign of being mentally or emotionally healthy or behaving in a moral way. When the readers feel repulsed by the soldiers and what they’re doing, it’s because they recognize that these people are a serious danger to others, and they are not functioning in a normal way. Your brain is warning you of a threat. It’s a past threat rather than an immediate one, but if you find the soldiers and their actions upsetting, it’s a sign that your brain has accurately assessed the risk associated with these people and the harm they do. You have accurately connected the suffering of other people for whom you feel empathy with the people who are the direct cause. I’m not saying that the soldiers were necessarily psychopaths, but lack of empathy and remorse and calculated manipulation are all symptoms of psychopathy and should raise alarms for anyone confronted with those signs. So, feeling bad about this situation and the people causing it is a sign that you yourself are mentally and emotionally healthy and have correctly recognized the seriousness of the situation and the harm being done to other people. What I’m saying is that, even when you’re feeling bad, it’s for good reasons, and that deserves recognition.

When I was young, I felt angry and frustrated by stories where people were doing terrible things to others. I still do because that’s part of empathy, but I also came to realize that part of my frustration when it came to historical situations came from my inability to change the situation. When harm has been done, it’s impossible to undo it. What was done was done. I can’t help the people who died, and I can’t even punish the wrong-doers because they’re dead now, too. It’s frustrating to find yourself confronted by a situation where nothing can change. But, I think it’s important to realize that change has happened and is currently happening. History is being written all the time, not even just through writing but through the ways that people live their lives every day. Even when a particular event is over, events and people keep moving. Bad events can cast long shadows, causing harm long after the initial event. That’s part of what makes them so bad. However, as time moves on, new people enter the scene, and new things happen, including things that people in the past would never have foreseen. It eventually reaches a point where the things that continue to happen rely on what we, the living, continue to do or allow to be done. History takes the long view, and I think people need to be reminded of that.

Do you suppose that the people in this story who act as villains thought of themselves like that? Further point, how much does it matter how they thought of themselves? Maybe they thought of themselves as winners at the time because they were getting their way and the people they were hurting were unable to stop them from hurting and killing them, but is that really “winning”? Lazy historians frequently brush things off by saying that “history is written by the victors“, but if that were really true, would we even be hearing or reading stories like this? Would we ever hear about slaves or care about the victims of war and atrocity? Would we ever consider the perspectives of people who died at all? Or does it change your mind about what “winning” really is and who’s really a “winner”? Maybe, in life and history, there aren’t any “winners” because neither of those was ever really a contest to begin with. (Or, as some put it, life is a collection of contests that people can simultaneously be both winning and losing. Personally, I think life is just for living, not for winning against someone else who is also trying to just live and probably couldn’t care less about you “winning” or not.) Apparent victories aren’t always real accomplishments, and people who see that reality are the ones who write the most accurate histories. Individual human lives only last so long, so any apparent “win” by an individual or group is never more than temporary. Our sense of what history includes and what people in the past were really like changes as we increase our knowledge of it and reconsider the context, not unlike the way my 40-year-old self has a deeper understanding of this book than my 13-year-old self did.

Remember that, at the beginning of this particular story, the Navajo warriors were going to raid the Utes. We never really find out in the book why they were going to do this, but does it matter anymore when the Navajos themselves get raided and subjected to something that might be even worse than what they were originally planning to do to their enemies? The story drops this subplot when the march begins. Life is like that, constantly moving, ever changing. History goes on and on. Sometimes, a young warrior who was praised for his prowess gets shot in the arm and can’t pull a bow anymore. Sometimes, a 40-year-old woman from the 21st century looks back on 19th century soldiers who may have thought of themselves as heroes and wants to tell them, to their faces, that they couldn’t be more wrong about that. If they’re not evil psychopaths, they’re doing a dang good job of pretending, and I never once thought of them as being “heroes” in my entire life. That’s life for you. Each of the people who have read this book or ever will read it are among the new people entering the story and its sequels, and we all have the ability to decide what role we want to play in the on-going story of history.

What happens after the book ends, is important, too. If I were teaching this, I would follow up this particular chapter of Native American and Navajo history by talking about some of the developments that continued to happen in their history, including some of the better moments, like the development of the written form of the Navajo language (for much of it’s history, Navajo was only a written language – that’s why the soldiers in the story couldn’t leave a written message in Navajo) and how code talkers used the Navajo language during WWII. The people who realized that these things were possible and something worth working toward were creative individuals. Rather than seeking to destroy something or repress it, they found creative ways to make use of what was there and put people’s talents to good use, helping others. The worst moments of history have been when people without empathy use others or seek to destroy them for personal gain, but the triumphant moments are when people take what they have and find a way to make it better. Noting these positive moments doesn’t make the bad parts of history any better than they actually were, but what we want is more of these positive moments of creativity and development and the type of people who are willing to work to make them happen.

It helps to balance out the explanations of what went wrong and people who did wrong with examples of what was better. Some teachers stress how we teach the bad moments so people learn from the past and don’t repeat it, and that’s true. However, I think we also need to add on what has worked and what we want people to do instead. A “don’t do this” needs to be followed up by “do this instead” to be an effective instruction. As a society, we don’t want more destroyers and takers. We want innovators and makers. We want creative people who find new uses for resources, including human resources and talents, and who are dedicated to truly helping others and human society as a whole instead of merely helping themselves to what others have that they want. This book demonstrates the dark side of humanity, but as I said, history is still being written every day with new players.

On the lighter side of this story, I enjoyed the descriptions of the coming-of-age ceremony for young women that Bright Morning has and the marriage ceremony later. During her time in captivity in the Spanish town, Bright Morning also attends Easter celebrations. She doesn’t understand Christianity and has never heard of Jesus before, and she doesn’t understand what the holiday is about or what’s going on. Rosita tries to explain to her who Jesus is in terms of Navajo religion. I found the explanation fascinating, but Bright Morning is still confused.

The Rover Boys in the Jungle

The Rover Boys

The Rover Boys in the Jungle by Arthur M. Winfield (aka Edward Stratemeyer), 1899.

My Foreword

I wasn’t particularly eager for this book after the first one in the series. I didn’t think the Rover Boys was as much fun as later Stratemeyer Syndicate books and there are some instances of racial language that are uncomfortable to explain. However, this is the book where the boys actually go to Africa in search of their missing father, and it resolves one of the major problems that the first book in the series set up, and I wanted to see it end.

As the book says at the beginning, the boys’ father went to Africa before the beginning of the series to look for gold mines and hasn’t been heard from since. The boys don’t know if their father is alive or dead, and meanwhile, the boys’ enemies from the first book in the series are still hanging around. The Baxters were put in prison for attempting to kidnap Dora at the direction of Josiah Crabtree in the book immediately before this one, but Dan Baxter escapes early in this book, and Crabtree is still around somewhere. The introduction and first chapter to the book brings readers up to date on developments from the previous books, sort of like the introductions to episodes of movie serials that didn’t exist at the time these books were written. Books in this series really need to be read in order, and if you skip any, like I did, you really need the introduction to bring you up-to-date.

The Story

There is a new boy at school, Hans Mueller, who is from Germany. This book was written before World War I, so there is nothing critical or derogatory about Germans, but the boys decide to tease Hans a little by playing up myths of the Wild West to scare him. They tell him that the school will be teaching them how to fight Indians (Native Americans) and that he’ll have to learn how to scalp people. Hans doesn’t know what they’re talking about at first, and when they explain it to him, he’s alarmed. (Good, Hans. That’s a sign of sanity.) Hans says that the only time he’s seen American Indians was at a traveling Wild West show that came to Germany, and he thought they looked scary. The other boys have a laugh about spooking poor Hans and drop the matter.

I mentioned in my last Rover Boys review that early Stratemeyer Syndicate books had archaic racial language and sometimes questionable racial attitudes that was later rewritten when various series were reissued. This early series hasn’t been revised. This first scene with Hans isn’t really so much a slur against Native Americans as prank with the boys playing up Wild West stories, but the book is just starting out.

Hans becomes the boys’ friend, but they prank Hans again later, scaring him with Tom wearing a Native American costume as he threatens to scalp him to continue their earlier joke, and they use the term “red man.” (We haven’t even gotten to Africa yet, so I was cringing at this point at what might be in store.) When Hans realizes that it was all just a prank, he tries to get the better of Tom by taking away the gun that Tom was using as a prop to scare him, and Tom tells him that the gun is too old to fire and isn’t dangerous. He just found it in the barn, and it’s all rusty. Tom tells Hans to pull the trigger and see that it won’t fire, which is the dumbest thing that anybody can do with a random old gun they just found somewhere. The gun explodes in Hans’s hands, knocking both Hans and Tom unconscious and scraping them with shrapnel. The other boys are scared, but they finally manage to bring them both around. Tom is horrified when he realizes what happened, saying that he’s been playing with that gun for awhile and pulled the trigger a dozen times himself, which is why he thought that the gun was unloaded and harmless (meaning he did the dumbest thing that anybody can do with a random old gun they just found somewhere repeatedly because, up to this point, dumb luck was on his side). He is shocked to realize that he’s lucky that he hasn’t shot somebody before and that he and Hans weren’t killed by the exploding gun. He apologizes to Hans and promises that this is the end of the pranks. Tom was always the lead prankster in earlier books, but he grows up a little here, realizing that reckless pranks have consequences.

At school, the boys participate in a kite flying contest, and Sam is almost pulled over the edge of a cliff by his kite. (Seriously.) Dora tells Dick that her mother had a dream that Crabtree tried to shoot him in a forest. (Prophetic?) The boys also have a run-in with Dan Baxter, who is still lurking around and swearing revenge.

Then, the boys turn their attention to a thief at school. Sam witnesses someone, who is probably the thief, sneaking around at night. Unfortunately, he didn’t see the person’s face, only describing this person as tall. Captain Putnam comes to believe that Alexander “Aleck” Pop, a black man who works for the school, is the thief because he receives an anonymous note that says he’s guilty. Sam doesn’t trust the anonymous note and tells the Captain so, saying that he can’t believe anyone as good-hearted as Aleck is would be a thief. However, the Captain insists that Aleck’s belongings be searched, and some of the objects that have been stolen turn up among his stuff. It’s a pretty obvious frame, and Alexander protests that he’s innocent, but Captain Putnam doesn’t believe him. There’s some ugly racial language used during this part. The word “coon” is used twice, and when the students at the school discuss the situation, one says the n-word. Fortunately, our Rover boy heroes aren’t the ones using that language, and Tom even tells the boy who used the n-word that he’s just resentful against Aleck for catching him doing something he shouldn’t have done earlier. The boy who used the n-word, Jim Caven, is portrayed as mean and unreasonable, and he gets into a fight with Tom in which he almost hurts him very badly. I was uncomfortable with the language in this scene, although I was somewhat reassured to see that it was used to characterize the ones using the worst of it as being the bad characters. My reassurance wasn’t complete because that’s not the only questionable racial language in the book.

Captain Putnam sends someone to escort Aleck to the authorities. He says that he supposes that the boys think he’s being too harsh with him, but he’s also suspicious of Aleck because he knows that members of his family have been in trouble with the law, too. The boys say it isn’t fair to blame him for things his relatives did and that they still don’t think he’s guilty. However, Aleck escapes before they reach the authorities, and they hear rumors that he went to New York City and boarded a ship to go overseas somewhere. The boys are sad, thinking that maybe they’ll never see him again. (You know they will.)

It’s not much of a surprise when the Rover boys later learn that Jim Caven has sold some things that match the description of other objects that have been stolen. Apparently, he’s been the thief all along and deliberately framed Aleck to get revenge on him. (I partly expected that the thief might be Dan Baxter, considering that he’s escaped from jail and is hanging around somewhere, probably needing money.) When the other boys confront Jim Caven, he flees into the woods. The other boys explain the situation to Captain Putnam, and he searches Jim Caven’s belongings, finding the rest of the stolen items. (You know, they could have just conducted a general search of the school and everyone’s belongings before this. This is a military academy, so a surprise dorm inspection wouldn’t be out of character, and it would have settled the matter much earlier.) Aleck’s name is cleared, but since he’s fled, they don’t know how to find him and tell him. Captain Putnam is sorry that he didn’t believe Aleck before.

However, they don’t have much time to consider it because the boys are soon summoned home by their uncle because he’s had news of their father. A ship captain has written Uncle Randolph a letter saying that his crew rescued a man who was floating on a raft off the Congo River. The man died soon after they brought him aboard their ship. They don’t know who the man was, but he was carrying a letter from the Rover boys’ father saying that he found a gold mine in Africa but was taken captive by King Susko of the Bumwo tribe (not a real African tribe, I can’t find anything about it) in order to prevent him from telling the secret of the mine to outsiders. Specifically, the tribe is afraid that the English and French colonizers will come to loot the mine and kill them. (Actually, a depressingly reasonable fear.) Anderson Rover explains in the letter that they don’t understand Americans. (That wouldn’t help, Anderson. Your boys attend a school run by a man who served with General Custer, and if this tribe knew what happened to Native Americans when gold was discovered on their land, they wouldn’t be reassured at all.) Anderson Rover is in fear of his life and asks his brother Randolph to come and rescue him if he can, but the letter is dated a year ago, so his family still doesn’t know if he’s alive now or not.

Uncle Randolph tells the boys that he wants to go to Africa to find his brother and asks Dick to come with him, as the oldest of his nephews. Dick, of course, agrees to go, but Tom and Sam refuse to be left behind. They decide that all of them will go.

On the ship to Africa, they meet an English adventurer named Mortimer Blaze, who is going to Africa for big game hunting. Tom asks him what will happen if the big game decides to hunt him instead, and he just says that it will be a “pitched battle.” (Doesn’t sound appealing to me.) When they talk about the people in Africa, they use the word “native” a lot and not in a flattering way. The general attitude seems to be that the “native” Africans are not very civilized (I was expecting they would say that because of the time period of this book), and Mortimer Blaze tells stories about tribes of people who are either very tall or very short. (I think he’s really referring to people from folktales, which I covered in the Encyclopedia of Legendary Creatures.) At one point, the characters say that the warm climate is the reason why Africa hasn’t made more progress toward civilization, that the warmth makes people want to be lazy. The adults in the story shock the boys by saying that not only is there no Christianity but that people there don’t really believe anything in particular, putting them even behind people Christians would consider heathens. They also make a shocking comment at one point about unwanted children being fed to crocodiles. They conclude that “civilization” can’t come soon enough to Africa, even if it has to be forced in with weapons. (Wow. I knew there was bound to be a lot of generic “native” and “savage” talk when I started this book because of the time period, but these matter-of-fact slights and accusations sound like they came straight out of Mrs. Mortimer’s books about Countries of the World Described, which heaps criticism and accusations of violence and immorality on pretty much all of the people of the world. Mrs. Mortimer’s books are much older than any Stratemeyer Syndicate books, and I wonder if Edward Stratemeyer read them in his youth. It wouldn’t surprise me because the attitudes match, and here he is, passing it all on to the next generation of kids in the form of an exciting adventure story.)

In a stroke of good luck, they end up rescuing Aleck, who was stranded at sea from the ship he boarded during his earlier escape. Aleck is glad to see the boys again, and they tell him that his name has been cleared and the real thief was caught. Aleck is glad to hear that, but he’s worried when he finds out that the ship that picked him up is headed for Africa. Aleck reflects that he always heard that his ancestors came from the Congo region of Africa, but he doesn’t really want to go there because he’s used to life in America and wouldn’t know what to do in Africa. (The Rover boys and Aleck go on for awhile about how great the United States is, and I know they were trying to sound patriotic, but the way they said it felt oddly like a sales pitch to me. I felt like saying, “You don’t need to sell me on the place. I already live here.”) The boys explain how they’re going there in search of their father. Aleck decides that he’d rather join their expedition than stay on the ship, and he offers his services as a valet. Uncle Randolph and the boys are glad to accept his help, and Uncle Randolph says it might be useful to have a black man with them who they know and trust in case they need someone to blend in with the native population and spy for them.

In a surprising twist, the boys also run into Dan Baxter on their arrival in Africa. When they ask him what he’s doing there, he says that he got drunk and was Shanghaied onto a ship, forced to work as a sailor. He was treated cruelly on the ship and ran away as soon as he had the chance. Now, he’s alone and has no money and no way home. The Rover boys feel sorry for him and give him money for him to buy his passage back to the United States. Dan Baxter asks to join their expedition, too, and they consider it as a sign that Dan is starting to reform because of his expedition. However, Dan is still a bully and an opportunist, and when he gets a counter-offer from someone else who is willing to hire him to make trouble for the Rovers, he accepts that instead, still holding a grudge against the Rovers because his father always told him that Anderson Rover stole a mine from him years ago that would have made them rich.

When I reviewed the first book in this series, I complained about the various unresolved story lines and miscellaneous villains still running around at the end of the story, still left to work on their individual plots against the Rover boys and their friends. In this book, every unresolved story line and villain from the first book collides with each other in Africa. Not only is Dan Baxter in Africa coincidentally at the same time as the Rovers, but Josiah Crabtree is also in Africa, for completely unrelated reasons from either the Rovers or Dan Baxter. He does attempt to kill Dick, but Dick survives. He is even rescued from a lion by one of his brothers.

So, is there true resolution with the main villains of the story, Dan Baxter and Josiah Crabtree? Not really. I looked up summaries of other books in the series, and even after they get some comeuppance, they continue to come back in sequels.

What is resolved by the end of the story is that the Rovers find their father alive. They rescue him from the village where he was being held captive, taking some of the women and children from the village with them as hostages to keep the village warriors from attacking them. They say privately that they wouldn’t have really hurt the women and children, but they tell the men that they’ll kill them if they don’t let the rescue party go. (This was another shocking part for me because I wouldn’t have thought of any of the usual Stratemeyer Syndicate heroes doing this. Somehow, I can’t picture the Hardy boys going this far, taking women and children hostage and threatening to kill them.) Once the rescue party is sure that they’re safe, they release their hostages and head for home. Anderson Rover says that he did find a gold mine, and someday, he’ll come back and loot it, er, mine it, but right now, all he wants to do is go home with his boys. It would be heartwarming if I didn’t know that he’s going to come back someday for gold on land that belongs to someone else who would never willingly sell it to him, and his boys are talking revenge on the king of the tribe that held their father captive.

This book is in the public domain and is easily available online in various formats through Project Gutenberg and Internet Archive (which has an audiobook).

My Reaction

I already gave much of my reaction to this book during the description of the plot because much of my reaction had to do with the racial language of the book. I knew there were going to be problematic portions before I even started, but frankly, there were too many of them for me to go into detail on all of them. What I described gives the broad strokes. I won’t say the book is deliberately trying to be insulting to black people. Aleck is portrayed as a good character who was wronged by a white boy by being framed for theft. However, there is a kind of casual racism in the story, like the casual references to how “uncivilized” Africa is and the characters’ off-hand supposition that it’s probably due to the climate there. I wouldn’t say that the characters or author hate black people (except maybe the non-Christian ones who feed children to crocodiles, which sounds like things Mrs. Mortimer accused various people of doing in the worst parts of Countries of the World Described), but I would say that there is a kind of condescension and dismissiveness that everyone, characters and author, seems to take for granted.

I can’t recall any of the characters using the phrase, “you know how they are”, but that’s the vibe I was getting. I got the feeling like the characters were saying things to each other and the author was saying things to his child readers with that sort of knowing tone, like “we all know these things.” No. “We” don’t. I know that Stratemeyer probably got a lot of this from a combination of old minstrel shows and Mrs. Mortimer or something very similar because I’ve seen Mrs. Mortimer‘s books, and I know how she talks. I also know why she says the things she does, and I’m not putting up with her attitude, even when it’s coming from someone else. Maybe the Rovers boys as characters and their child audiences would have read her books or similar ones before and nodded along with what Stratemeyer says because it confirms “information” they’ve seen before, but I’ve had more than my fill of wild accusations and crazy conspiracy theories, and I have no more patience left for any of it.

Mrs. Mortimer portrayed her book series as a factual introduction to world geography and the habits of people in different countries, but the truth behind her criticism, condescension, outspoken rudeness, and many of the wild accusations she makes about badly-brought-up children, dead bodies floating in rivers or just left in the street (depending on nationality), or the “antics” of “savages” around the world is her religious agenda (and, I think, probably some personal emotional and self-esteem issues, but that’s just a guess). She used missionaries with their own agendas as references for anecdotes in her books and tried to make people of various religions around the world sound evil and crazy on purpose to emphasize why “the Protestant” is the best religion (her words – she was specifically Evangelical and downright pushy about it). I would say that she also never hated black people … except maybe non-Christian ones, who as I recall, she claimed didn’t know what religion they were and were given to “antics”, dancing around and yelling or something. She wasn’t too clear on that point, probably because she didn’t know what she was talking about herself. On the other hand, she seemed inclined to be sympathetic to black people in the US who were victims of ill treatment, probably because they were Christian and most likely Protestant, which would have made all the difference in the world to her. She probably would have been okay with Aleck because he’s a Christian who was born in the US and has definitely never fed a baby to a crocodile in his life. She did not approve of the the concept of slavery at all and wouldn’t have tolerated physical cruelty of anyone due to race, which is to her credit, but none of that stopped her from spreading stories and rumors of violent savagery and teaching children that anyone who believed anything other than Protestant Christianity was “ignorant”, “savage”, and “wicked”, all words she actually used in describing people from various countries around the world because that’s what she wanted young children to “know” about other people. Mrs. Mortimer’s religious prejudices probably would have gone over the heads of the children who were these books’ original readers, especially if it echoed the talk of the children’s parents, but that’s how we end up with generations of children who grow into adults with casually racist ideas, thinking nothing of it, throwing around racist language without a clue or a care for the consequences. It’s in the book because it’s what “we” all “know”, dear Mrs. Mortimer said as much before, and Stratemeyer is just saying what “we” were all thinking, right? I think that’s about how that goes.

Let me bring you into the real world. If readers want to know what was really happening in Africa during the 19th century, there are far better sources. Africa is an entire continent, and there were many complex events happening all over, particularly related to European colonization. Outside forces were claiming territory in Africa, not so much for benefiting the people there and bringing them “civilization” as accomplishing their own personal aggrandizement and enrichment. (You know, rather like a man who is already rich in his own country coming to find and claim a gold mine that’s on someone else’s land because he’s addicted to the thrill of the hunt and acquisition and uses that thrill to hide from his own personal problems that he doesn’t want to face at home, like dealing with the loss of his wife and the raising of his boisterous sons. Just saying.) There were wars, famine, and disease in various parts of Africa during this period, partly due to internal power struggles among different African groups and leaders. I don’t know if anybody ever fed anyone to a crocodile on purpose, but infanticide is part of the dark side of humanity that comes out when times are desperate and hopes of survival in general are low. It’s a symptom of a society that’s suffering, and societies have suffered in that way many times around the world. If someone is likely to die soon after birth anyway, the hopeless parents might say, why even try? I suppose some might be tempted to say that having a religion that forbids killing children would help, but it hasn’t always, and having food also helps. I don’t blame 19th century missionaries for attempting to help people, but those who came in with a sense of self-importance, deciding ahead of time what would help without understanding the situation they were walking into, often didn’t help. Missionaries sometimes ended up getting killed in the middle of the unrest and power struggles. Some were even actively deceptive, using trickery and their position to gain advantages for themselves or the governments they represented at the expense of the people they were supposedly trying to help. But, the 19th century wasn’t all war, famine, and exploitation in Africa. The missionaries who were serious about doing some good and set up practical schools did provide useful centers of learning that helped educate future leaders and professional people and gave them tools they could use to build the lives they wanted. African societies did continue to build their own nations and identities. Overall, the colonization of Africa was more of an intrusive, disruptive force, providing additional hardships and obstacles to success more than solutions to any problems that Africa had before, not the glorious “civilizing” force that prevents people from feeding children to crocodiles that the book described.

So, now that I’ve talked about the historical and cultural influences behind the more uncomfortable parts of this book, I think it’s pretty obvious why early Stratemeyer Syndicate books had to be rewritten and revised in the mid-20th century. I knew this book was going to be cringe-worthy in places, but I have to admit that I was surprised at just how bad certain parts got. I hadn’t even considered that the word “coon” might appear. I never heard that word growing up and didn’t even know what it meant until I was in college, so I was pretty taken aback that a just-for-fun book for kids would use it, even one from the late 19th century. I suppose having grown up with the tamer, revised versions of books from the Stratemeyer Syndicate, I underestimated what the older series were like. I can only hope that I’ve made it pretty clear for people reading this review what the problems with this series were.

I debated about whether or not to even post this review, but I’ve talked about some uncomfortable books before (and said many highly critical things in my earlier rant about Mrs. Mortimer, my favorite example of a very popular bad influence in children’s literature – if you only know about her from The Peep of Day, you haven’t seen anything yet, even though the first chapter of that book is one of the most disturbing things I’ve ever read that was intended for small children). I’ve been planning a page discussing Stratemeyer Syndicate series books because they have been an important force in American children’s literature for so long, and it seemed only right to talk about their first series. So, now I’ve talked about it, and nobody else has to suffer through this book if they don’t want to. I found the characters, language, and situation aggravating, and the rewards for perseverance were inconsequential. This is certainly not something to spring on suspecting people, especially modern children, who might try using certain words for the attention-getting shock value without really understanding what they mean. I would say that this series should be primarily for adults interested in the history of children’s literature and others who know what they’re reading, understand what’s behind it, and can draw the line between fictional book and real life.

I’m not sure if I want to read any further books in this series because the unresolved problems of the stories get on my nerves, and there will probably be further issues with racial language, and I’d just have to repeat all the same explanations I’ve already given. I’m not saying a firm “no” to the rest of this series because there are indications that some people would like to see more coverage of them, but if I do any more, it’s probably going to be awhile and will only be delivered in small doses.

I wasn’t quite expecting to have these Mrs. Mortimer flashbacks from this book, but in honor of that experience, I might as well say that even though I’m leaving the Rover boys behind for now, I’m planning to go read many other useless novels “about people who have never lived”, which Mrs. Mortimer despised, and because I have access to some of them in audio book format, I can listen to them while knitting something completely unnecessary just because I want to. (If you read my rant/review about Countries of the World Described, you know what I’m talking about.) I’m not going to do it just because it would annoy Mrs. Mortimer. It’s something that I enjoy and do routinely anyway. I would do it even if it was something I thought Mrs. Mortimer would actually like. It’s more that knowing that she would have disapproved and can’t do anything about it makes me feel like we’re even because that’s the way I feel about her books and others like them.

Hand Shadows

When I first read and started playing with this book as a kid, I didn’t stop to read the preface in the book or look at the publishing date, so I completely missed the fact that this is a reprint of a book from the late 1850s. The author, Henry Bursill (link repaired 9-11-24), was a professional artist

In the preface, Bursill refers to a well-known print from the early 19th century called The Rabbit on the Wall, which shows a father making shadow figures on the wall with his hands to amuse his children. Bursill says that there have been other books about hand shadows before his, but he emphasizes that his book is not the same as theirs because he has worked out his own hand shadows through experimentation. He says that it will take some practice for people making hand shadows to get them perfectly, but he encourages people to practice and not be afraid to work out new hand shadows of their own through experimentation. Bursill did the illustrations for the book himself, and he says that he began sketching some of the designs during his time as an art student and that he would amuse some fellow students by making hand shadows on the wall of his studio.

Other than the preface, the only words in the book are the captions on each of the pictures. I’ve tried some of the hand shadows in the book, and I had a more difficult time than the preface makes it sound. The only ones I’ve really been able to do well were the bird and the greyhound. I haven’t given up on mastering some of the more difficult ones someday, though!

The book is available to read for free online through Project Gutenberg and Internet Archive (multiple copies).

Addy’s Cook Book

Addy, An American Girl

Addy’s Cook Book by Rebecca Sample Bernstein, Terri Braun, Tamara England, and Jodi Evert, 1994.

This cook book is one of the activity books that was written to accompany the Addy series that is part of the American Girls franchise. The American Girls books were written to help teach American history (as well as sell the accompanying dolls and accessories), so this book has recipes of the type that people would have eaten during the American Civil War, when the character of Addy lived, and some historical information.

The book begins with sections of historical information about African Americans, kitchens, and table settings in the 1860s. It describes the lives of slaves and explains how they were given basic rations of food which they could supplement and extend by producing or gathering some food of their own, such as vegetables they grew or fish they caught themselves. When they managed to escape from slavery, they had to depend on help from others, such as churches or abolitionists, until they became established in their new lives. When they were able, many of them provided help to others who were in the same position. (This was a topic covered in the Addy books.)

The types of kitchens they used depended on where they were living. As slaves, Civil War era African Americans would do their cooking in small fireplaces attached to the small cabins where they lived. Because they needed the fire for cooking, they kept it burning all the time, even in hot weather. Free African Americans had more options. Depending on their living arrangements, they might have a stove for their cooking, or if they lived in a boarding house, they might be provided with meals as part of their boarding, paid for along with the rent on their rooms.

The recipes in the book are divided into three sections: breakfast, dinner, and favorite foods. There is a section with some general cooking tips, but there are other cooking tips and pieces of historical information included along with the recipes. Some information that I found particularly useful explains why some historical recipes can be confusing to read. Because some people were using cooking fires and some were using stoves, 19th century recipes can have vague-sounding instructions like “fry until golden brown” instead of specific cooking times and temperatures. It was also common for people to cook favorite dishes from memory instead of following written recipes. People learned to cook from their elders, and they just continued doing what parents and grandparents always did when they cooked. The book doesn’t mention it, but this style of cooking also continued into the 20th century, so even when people wrote down recipes, they might seem vague or incomplete to modern readers. It was like that with recipes that my grandmother and great-grandmother wrote down, too. They were accustomed to making certain recipes mostly from memory, and they didn’t feel obligated to write down every little step, assuming that anyone who read it would already know how to make that kind of dish and would just need a few reminders about amounts. Fortunately, the recipes in this book are all written with detailed, modern instructions and include cooking times and oven temperatures.

The book explains that poor people during the Civil War didn’t usually have much for breakfast because they had to rise early and get to work. Most mornings, they might have some leftovers from the previous night or some simple hot foods, like buttermilk biscuits and hominy grits, a traditional Southern breakfast food made from corn (my grandmother said that she had it when she was growing up on a farm in Indiana, too). As a special treat, they might have scrambled eggs or sausage and gravy.

The dinner section includes main dishes, like fried fish, and side dishes, like hush puppies. A particular recipe that gets extra attention is Hoppin’ John, a rice dish with black-eyed peas and bacon. Hoppin’ John is special because it’s a dish traditionally served at New Year’s Day.

The section of favorite foods include chicken shortcake, a few other side dishes, and a few special treats, including peach cobbler and shortbread. I’ve tried the shortbread recipe, and I like it. It’s easy to make and includes only a few ingredients, and it’s really good. It does contain a lot of butter, so it’s just an occasional treat.

The book ends with a section of advice for planning an Emancipation party. It explains how people celebrated when the Emancipation Proclamation was read publicly on December 31, 1862, having been transmitted to communities by telegraph. Children played games like Novel Writers (which is a story-writing game similar to Consequences) and Blindman’s Buff. The book also describes the origins of Juneteenth – slaves in Texas were freed on June 19th, 1865, about two and half years after the Emancipation Proclamation.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

Through the Looking Glass

Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll, 1871.

The story of Alice in Wonderland is over 150 years old, and the sequel, Through the Looking Glass, is now 150 years old, as of 2021. These books have been reprinted in many different languages and editions. The edition that I’m using for this review is actually a combined edition of the two from 1960 with added notes by Martin Gardner. (Although I used a cover image from a different edition above.) I like editions with added notes because there is quite a lot to explain about both Lewis Carroll and his stories.

I explained a lot of Lewis Carroll’s background and some of the controversies surrounding his life in my review of Alice in Wonderland. One important point about the Alice stories is that they are full of puzzles, riddles, word games, in-jokes, and parodies of poems that were popular in the author’s time. Lewis Carroll (real name Charles Dodgson) was a mathematician and scholar at Oxford, and he liked to play with logic puzzles and word games. Sometimes he would hide people’s names within poems or parts of the story by rearranging the letters of their names or using them as the beginning of lines in a poem, as an acrostic. There is an acrostic poem which is dedicated to Alice Liddell, the real girl who inspired Alice in Wonderland. This poem is printed as part of some editions of Through the Looking Glass, including the one that I’m using. The acrostic poem also references Row, Row, Row Your Boat, which is apparently older although its origins aren’t completely certain. If you read down the beginning letters of the poem, you find out that Alice’s middle name was Pleasance.

The chess game in Through the Looking Glass is meant to be part of an actual chess game with real moves that can be mapped out on a board. The game and the moves in the story are explained in the preface of my copy of the book. Alice begins as a white pawn in the game, but when she reaches the other side of the board, she becomes a queen, which is part of the rules of chess – pawns that successfully reach the opponent’s side may be exchanged for other pieces. The colors of the chess pieces in Alice’s game are red and white instead of black and white because red and white are old traditional colors. Although black and white are common today, many different color combinations have been used, and the red and white combination dates back to the Middle Ages.

The story begins on the day before Guy Fawkes’ Night. (Alice has been watching the bonfire preparations out the window.) Alice is trying to wind some yarn, and her pet cat Dinah’s little black kitten keeps playing with it. Alice chastises the kitten, and then begins talking to the kitten about the way it was watching her play chess earlier in the day. Alice likes to play games of pretend, and she starts to pretend that the kitten is the red queen from the chess game. The kitten doesn’t cooperate in posing like the chess queen, so Alice holds it up to a looking-glass.

As they look in the mirror, Alice gets the idea of a “Looking-glass House” – a house on the other side of the mirror that can be reached by stepping through it. Alice starts to imagine what it would be like to enter the world on the other side of the mirror. She gets up on the mantle over the fireplace and steps through the mirror into the looking-glass house to see what is there.

Things in the looking-glass house are very strange. The clock and the pictures seem to be alive, and so are the chess pieces. Alice helps the pieces back onto their table after they’ve been knocked off, but they don’t seem to understand what has happened and are alarmed. Alice then picks up a book on the table near the chess board and reads the poem Jabberwocky, which is about the defeat of a horrible monster. The poem is written in backwards writing, and Alice has to hold it up to a mirror to read it. The poem is a nonsense poem that contains many made-up words, which are explained later on in the story.

Alice decides to see what is outside the house. She discovers that the flowers can talk to her, but they are rude and insulting. Then, Alice encounters the Red Queen, who has grown taller than she was in the house. (The flowers say that it’s because of all the fresh air outside.) The Red Queen is both commanding and contradictory, but she gives Alice directions to other “squares”, addressing her as a chess pawn.

Pawns get to move two squares on their first turn, so Alice gets to go by train. In the train carriage, Alice meets many strange characters, including a gentleman dressed in white, a Goat, a Beetle, and a Gnat, who keeps whispering in her ear and suggesting that she make jokes based on puns. Through the Gnat, Alice meets other strange insects, like the snap-dragon-fly, the rocking-horse-fly, and the bread-and-butterfly. The Gnat tells Alice that the creatures in the woods don’t have names, and when Alice goes through the woods, she temporarily forgets her name, getting it back again on the other side.

Soon after, Alice meets Tweedledum and Tweedledee. (Lewis Carroll didn’t invent these characters. They are nursery rhyme characters.) They ask Alice if she likes poetry, and they tell her the tale of The Walrus and the Carpenter. (This is one of the most-quoted poems in the Alice stories – many people remember the part where they “talk of many things” – “Shoes and ships and sealing wax and cabbages and kings.”) At the end, Alice can’t decide which of the two characters she likes the best because both are sneaky and eat the oysters that trusted them, so she decides that she doesn’t like either of them. (Yeah, I can think of others stories where I’ve felt the same way.) Alice hears a strange sound, and they tell her that it’s the Red King snoring and that the Red King is actually dreaming about her right now. Tweedledum and Tweedledee insist that Alice isn’t a real person, only part of the Red King’s dream, and that she’d disappear if he were to wake up, which upsets Alice. Alice starts to cry, which she thinks is proof that she’s real, but they claim that those aren’t real tears. Finally, Alice decides that they’re just talking nonsense and that there’s no point in crying over it. Tweedledum and Tweedledee want to have a battle (as in their poem), but a large crow interrupts them and frightens them away by producing a great wind.

Alice catches hold of a shawl that was being blown away by the wind and returns it to its owner, the White Queen. The White Queen speaks very strangely, and she says that it’s an effect of living backwards. Because she lives backwards, her memory works both ways, and she can remember things that haven’t happened yet. The White Queen screams with pain before she pricks her finger, so she doesn’t have to do it again after her finger is hurt. Alice cries when she talks about how lonely she is in the woods, and the White Queen distracts her by telling her to consider things because no one can think of two things at once (which is true). The White Queen talks about considering and believing impossible things (sometimes she believes “six impossible things before breakfast” – one of the most famous lines that is often quoted from this story).

As Alice asks the White Queen if her finger is better, she suddenly and inexplicably finds herself in a shop and talking to a sheep, who asks her what she wants to buy. Alice tries to look around, and the Sheep asks her if she’s a child or a teetotum (a kind of spinning top used in old games, sometimes by itself and sometimes as a replacement for dice or a spinner – dreidels are a kind of teetotum) because of the way she’s turning around. The Sheep is knitting and keeps picking up more needles to knit with. For awhile, the shop disappears, and Alice finds herself in a boat with the Sheep, but then the shop returns, and the Sheep asks her again what she wants to buy.

Alice decides to buy an egg, and the egg that she buys turns into Humpty Dumpty when she approaches it. Humpty Dumpty is a bit rude and insults Alice’s name because he doesn’t think it means anything. Alice mistakes Humpty Dumpty’s cravat for a belt because he’s egg-shaped and doesn’t have a true neck for wearing a tie. Humpty Dumpty reveals that the cravat was an un-birthday (a concept that Lewis Carroll invented) present from the White King and Queen. All through the conversation, Humpty Dumpty uses words in unusual yet strangely nit-picky ways, making words mean only what he wants them to mean in the moment. Because he’s so particular about the meanings of words, Alice asks Humpty Dumpty about all the strange words in the Jabberwocky poem, and he explains what the made-up words mean. Humpty Dumpty recites another poem for Alice that doesn’t seem to have a true ending and then abruptly dismisses her.

As Alice leaves, she meets the king with all of his horses and men (from the Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme) and is introduced to one of his messengers. Alice is amused by the name and description of the messenger and starts playing a game of “I Love My Love” out loud with the messenger’s name. (The two messengers are called Haigha and Hatta and are shown looking like the March Hare and Mad Hatter from Alice in Wonderland in the illustrations.) The messenger informs the king that the lion and the unicorn are fighting for the crown again (another nursery rhyme reference). The king says that it’s all a joke because the crown is his and neither one of them is going to get it no matter which of them wins the fight.

The unicorn is amazed to meet Alice because he never knew that children were real before. As at the end of the rhyme, they are given plum cake, and they hand the dish to Alice for her to cut the cake. However, Alice finds that she can’t cut it, so they ask her to hand the cake around first and then cut it afterward, which surprisingly works.

After the others are drummed out of town, also as part of the rhyme, the Red Knight attempts to capture Alice, but the White Knight shows up to save her. The White Knight tells Alice all about his inventions, none of which make any sense, and sings her a song which apparently has several names and is set to the tune of a song Alice recognizes as “I give thee all, I can no more” (which is another name and the first line of the song which is really titled My Heart and Lute, which is part of the on-going joke about the song’s real name).

Then, Alice reaches the final square of the board and becomes a queen, finding a crown suddenly on her head. The Red Queen and the White Queen appear suddenly, and the Red Queen tells her that she must pass an examination before she can truly become a queen. The queens ask her a series of questions that are supposed to be math questions but are actually a combination of riddles and nonsense. Their general knowledge questions are a combination of nonsense and puns. Eventually, the Red Queen and White Queen both fall asleep to a parody of “Rock-a-bye Baby.”

Alice finds herself in front of a door labelled “Queen Alice,” but the old frog who comes to the door doesn’t seem to want to let her in. Alice enters anyway and sits next to the Red Queen and White Queen. They introduce her to the food being served at the feast, but they don’t actually allow her to have any because it isn’t polite to cut and serve something you’ve been introduced to, and the plum cake verbally protests when Alice tries to serve it anyway.

The White Queen tells Alice a riddle in poem form about fish. The riddle is never answered, but everyone drinks to Alice’s health. The Red Queen tells Alice that she should make a speech, and as she gets up, many strange things begin happening in the room. Alice thinks that the Red Queen is responsible and grabs hold of her, threatening to “shake her into a kitten.” Alice suddenly wakes up, holding her little black kitten.

Like in Alice in Wonderland, everything that Alice experienced was a dream. However, the end of the book poses the question of whether the dream was Alice’s or the Red King’s. The question is never answered; it’s just something to make the readers think. That’s actually what I like most about the Alice stories, that they are partly meant to make the reader think. The stories are somewhat disjointed and constantly changing, kind of like dreams do, but I appreciate all the references and parodies in the stories.

The book is now public domain and is easily available online through Internet Archive and Project Gutenberg.